Kings @ Raptors Game Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
VF21 said:
Clog up what? They weren't going inside; they were shooting from the perimeter all night.

What killed us was absymal shooting by Webber and Pedja and totally unacceptable shooting from the stripe.
While I hate to disagree with you VF.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/shotchart?gameId=250105028

they only made 7-24 from 3 point land thats only 21 points. Most of there points were in the area a center would/could be covering. I know Tag doesn't like to go outside of the paint but not to give him any min's at all. Not to mention long shots equal rebounds.

Would it have changed the game? Well I doubt it. The King's didnt want it tonight I guess. Just another game were they thought they could walk in against a sub par team and win. Definately mentality of a championship team.
 
VF21 said:
Are you kidding?

You think Ostertag could have guarded Bosh? Did you watch the game????

Bosh is young, agile and VERY fast. Tag wouldn't have been any more effective against him than anyone else was - and that's not speculation.
Well Webb was obviously not equipped to gaurd Bosh! Tag at least would've fouled him hard.
 
Sometimes you can't hit anything, even free throws!

The Kings looked like a rubber band that had been stretched out from the opening tip. Webb was obviously hurting and pressed to much,and am I completely losing it or did the best shooter on the planet make 2 field goals?(and one of those was a layup!) We can't beat anyone(even Toronto) on the road when those guys score like that. That being said if we make 3 more free throws we could have taken it into overtime. We weren't meant to win this one.
 
HndsmCelt said:
Hind sight is 20/20 I honestly can't fault Adelman here. Second guess him sure but doing what he did when he did it good calls. I doubt any coach in the NBA would have played Tag tonight.
Well Tag is playing career lows in min. Apparently Sloan didn't follow this idea.
 
Entity said:
Believe me with the way Phoenix is playing and we are playing we will not lose home court by just one game. I am thinking 4th or 5th spot.
Well, winning the Pacific is out of the question ... but Phoenix will probably be the #1/2 seed. We won't be playing them in the first round.

I was thinking of our first or second round opponents... records will be undoubtedly much closer and you'll have to look back to losses like this one if we end up having to play most of the postseason on the road.

Ah well, we can still go 3-1 on this trip right?? :)
 

HndsmCelt

Hall of Famer
Give Tronto prop here folks the WERE hitting open shots,moving the ball well, and remember this team has also beatten SA, Phoenix and the T Wolves. So lets give credit where ctedit was due FYI Webber in the post game said his legs felt good, that it was just a bad shooting night.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
BigWaxer - The perimeter is outside the paint. It isn't necessarily "downtown" or "beyond the arc" and it doesn't refer to just three point shots. And - in fact - I wasn't talking about three point shots. I was talking about the mid-range jumpers that I kept seeing them make. Tag would not have had any effect on those shots. In addition, TAG is horrible on a good day from the foul line and makes very few baskets.

Amazing to me how all of a sudden, Tag - the guy so many people moaned about us getting - is supposed to be the team savior on a night when everything else (with the exception of Brad's boards and Bibby's eventual scoring) went horribly wrong.
 
HndsmCelt said:
Give Tronto prop here folks the WERE hitting open shots,moving the ball well, and remember this team has also beatten SA, Phoenix and the T Wolves. So lets give credit where ctedit was due FYI Webber in the post game said his legs felt good, that it was just a bad shooting night.
I guess all the good teams lost to them. Then the Kings are considered a good team right? LOL
 
SacTownKid said:
How many points did our bench score tonight!? 16 combined.

Who got us back into the game!? Stats don't mean crap. Scoring wasn't what got us back into it.
OK fine, we play really good defense in that forth quarter but we don't score. What do you have than? A double digit loss. When your down by 18 points, of course scoring along with defense gets you back in the game. RA has done a marvelous job using his bench in the last few games just like he promised. Than we lose a game where we were on a back to back and our two best players have awful nights, and all of a sudden you want to blame it on RA not using Tag. Makes no sense.
 

HndsmCelt

Hall of Famer
SacTownKid said:
Well Tag is playing career lows in min. Apparently Sloan didn't follow this idea.
Tag was a starter in Utha with really margianal players behind him like Greg Foster. Of course Sloan played him, he had to.
 
BigWaxer said:
While I hate to disagree with you VF.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/shotchart?gameId=250105028

they only made 7-24 from 3 point land thats only 21 points. Most of there points were in the area a center would/could be covering. I know Tag doesn't like to go outside of the paint but not to give him any min's at all. Not to mention long shots equal rebounds.

Would it have changed the game? Well I doubt it. The King's didnt want it tonight I guess. Just another game were they thought they could walk in against a sub par team and win. Definately mentality of a championship team.
Not sure what your trying to prove with that shot chart.We outscored them by 10... 34-24 in the paint. Tag resides in the paint, he aint chasing those kids on mid-range jumpers either.
 

piksi

Hall of Famer
HndsmCelt said:
Give Tronto prop here folks the WERE hitting open shots,moving the ball well, and remember this team has also beatten SA, Phoenix and the T Wolves. So lets give credit where ctedit was due FYI Webber in the post game said his legs felt good, that it was just a bad shooting night.
Toronto shot 39% from the floor.
 

HndsmCelt

Hall of Famer
Bballkingsrock said:
I guess all the good teams lost to them. Then the Kings are considered a good team right? LOL
Well there may be a little more to qualify as a really good team than jsut loosing in Toronto, but yeah I think the Kings are a really good team... who just had a bad night. And Toronto is a decent team, that palys well at home and seems to have the ablity to step up for big games.
 
HndsmCelt said:
Tag was a starter in Utha with really margianal players behind him like Greg Foster. Of course Sloan played him, he had to.
Celt do you really have to bring logic and facts into this?
 
Last edited:
HndsmCelt said:
Give Tronto prop here folks the WERE hitting open shots,moving the ball well, and remember this team has also beatten SA, Phoenix and the T Wolves.
Thanks for pointing that out. I checked Raptors schedule, they beated Spurs by 5 and Twolves by 6 at home. They're now 10-4 at home (almost as good as the Kings home). They did lose to Suns though... but that was at Phoenix.
 
HndsmCelt said:
Tag was a starter in Utha with really margianal players behind him like Greg Foster. Of course Sloan played him, he had to.
Well on the other hand I believe he was a starter b/c he was capable of being a starter not because Sloan had no choice.

Should he start on this team? No.
Should he have games where he doesn't play at all? No.
Should he avg. 10 min a game? No.
 

HndsmCelt

Hall of Famer
piksi said:
Toronto shot 39% from the floor.
given the distance form the rim the majority of those shots came form thats not so bad, but yes if you are looking for a deciding factor in the game the look at the FT discrpency Kings 21-33 and Toronto 17-22 and Turn overs Kings 15 Toronto 11. But you still have to credit the Raps with a good game based on ball movement and running the floor.
 

HndsmCelt

Hall of Famer
Twix said:
Thanks for pointing that out. I checked Raptors schedule, they beated Spurs by 5 and Twolves by 6 at home. They're now 10-4 at home (almost as good as the Kings home). They did lose to Suns though... but that was at Phoenix.
Ooops my bad. I though they beat the Suns, but you are right, however they did beat Miami and Detroit... so my point is they do beat top teams...
 
VF21 said:
BigWaxer - The perimeter is outside the paint..
Thats exactly what I said in my post. Believe it or not tag does have to step outside of the paint sometimes.

He had 10 rebounds last night. I hate Tag, he is not the Kings savior, He sucks as a player and I have always thought that. I still think that and think it was a bad pickup for the Kings. Now u get were I am comming from. I cannot stand him as a player... But I support him as a King.



But my thoughts on this game and topics.


It's kinda a double edge sword considering Brad was playing so well. Do we pull Brad and put tag in just to do it? No that wouldn't make sense. I would say maybe pull Webb and try Tag for a bit and put Miller as the PF. Who knows.


The starters except for 2 didn't want to play. It may have made a difference if tag was in. Would of been nice to see. Even 2 to 5 min of time just to see how the Raps would match up. Either way I think we would have lost.


I really like and agree with this quote by Donne

We're an elite team, we should be making people match up with US, not the other way around.

Tonight our bench really got out played. Look at the Raps bench they had 35 pts ours had 16.


I may have been blinded the past week with the good play from our bench crew.


It's only one game lets see how the rest of this month unfolds. Gonna be a tough road after our next few games.
 
Last edited:

HndsmCelt

Hall of Famer
SacTownKid said:
Well on the other hand I believe he was a starter b/c he was capable of being a starter not because Sloan had no choice.

Should he start on this team? No.
Should he have games where he doesn't play at all? No.
Should he avg. 10 min a game? No.
Look I have been a Tag supporter from DAY one. When only a few posters were not screaming that loosing Vlade and siginng Tag would be the undoing of the team. Do I think he sould paly more... yes. Do I think that he should paly every game, Im not sure. I do understand the litis of his game in as much as we ahve seen of him, but if I were coaching I might want to experiment to SEE those limits in action with this squad, tonight might have been a good time to try just such an experiment, but bear in mind it would be an experiment. Truth be told Tag like most big heavy cneters has historicly NOT palyed well defensivly against lighter athletic centers who shoot out side the paint. Tag is not know for his passing and has never really been part of a team offense before. So how well h will do for long minuets in Sac is unknown, but so far I would say he has earned the right to try in a game where the starters are strugleing against a team that is not paly off bound., or during a huge lead.. tonight would have been a good time, perhaps the game in Atalanta will provide a better lab if the starters can get a nice 15 point lead in the 3rd.
 
BigWaxer said:
Thats exactly what I said in my post. Believe it or not tag does have to step outside of the paint sometimes.

He had 10 rebounds last night. I hate Tag, he is not the Kings savior, He sucks as a player and I have always thought that. I still think that and think it was a bad pickup for the Kings. Now u get were I am comming from. I cannot stand him as a player... But I support him as a King.



But my thoughts on this game and topics.


It's kinda a double edge sword considering Brad was playing so well. Do we pull Brad and put tag in just to do it? No that wouldn't make sense. I would say maybe pull Webb and try Tag for a bit and put Miller as the PF. Who knows.


The starters except for 2 didn't want to play. It may have made a difference if tag was in. Would of been nice to see. Even 2 to 5 min of time just to see how the Raps would match up. Either way I think we would have lost.


I really like and agree with this quote by Donne




Tonight our bench really got out played to. Look at the raps bench they had 35 pts ours had 16.


I may have been blinded the past week with the good play from our bench crew.


It's only one game lets see how the rest of this month unfolds. Gonna be a tough road after our next few games.
Don't get me wrong I see your point, Tag should at least get on the court. But you can't just ignore facts, We did outscore them in the paint, we did outrebound them. We couldn't score for long stretches... not exactly a situation screaming for Tag. But Hey, he should have at least gotten a shot, He's earned it.
 
KP said:
Don't get me wrong I see your point, Tag should at least get on the court. But you can't just ignore facts, We did outscore them in the paint, we did outrebound them. We couldn't score for long stretches... not exactly a situation screaming for Tag. But Hey, he should have at least gotten a shot, He's earned it.
Well said.
 
Maybe I was a little to harsh on Tag :) ...

I don't know him personally and from what I read (take that with a grain of salt) he is a great guy off the court and one has to give him props for his efforts in the community. Also one has to give him props for being in the league so long.

I can agree with what you said KP. He should have gotten a shot just to see if it created match up problems for the Raps. And unless he came in and completely changed the flow of the game (which we will never know) then the outcome would have likely been the same.


Either way I am ready for the ATL... A days rest may help some of those tired legs. Webb looked tired out there tonight. If Webb was on his game nobody on the Raps could have stopped him.

Either way bad loss, I am upset again  but ready for the next round, it’s only Jan so we still have some time to tweak things.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.