Kings @ Raptors Game Thread
- Thread starter piksi
- Start date
- Status
reasons not to pay Tag
(1) Toronto shot from out side with almost no inside game
(2) Kings offense sucked
(3) One of the 2 starters that did not suck was Brad
(4) Tag brings NO offense
(5) FT's beceam important and Tag is the worst in the leage
Reasons Pedaj and Webb got 30 min
(1) they are starters
(2) usulay good shooters have to shoot out of a slump so if they blow in the first half they are more likely to paly better in the second
(3) Once the Bench got the team back in the game, Webb and Pedja were well rested so they COULD have come in and stollen a W
(4) It shows confidence in your starters even on their off nights and that could be important in future games
(1) Toronto shot from out side with almost no inside game
(2) Kings offense sucked
(3) One of the 2 starters that did not suck was Brad
(4) Tag brings NO offense
(5) FT's beceam important and Tag is the worst in the leage
Reasons Pedaj and Webb got 30 min
(1) they are starters
(2) usulay good shooters have to shoot out of a slump so if they blow in the first half they are more likely to paly better in the second
(3) Once the Bench got the team back in the game, Webb and Pedja were well rested so they COULD have come in and stollen a W
(4) It shows confidence in your starters even on their off nights and that could be important in future games
yeah Webber took twice as many shots as Peja. but he made 3 times as many shots as peja. I do believe the % favors Cwebb. Not to mention 3 times as many rebounds and assist. Also why doesn't Brad rebound when Peja and Chris are doing good. I mean he goes all year barely getting 8 then when Peja and Chris have off nights then he decides to contribute. Do it the rest of the time maybe we can blow ppl out and not come down to the final 2 min EVERY ****ING GAME.
Who was Tag going to guard???
That Bonner guy (who I've never heard of) was taking outside shots and hitting them, Tag is too slow to run out to the outside and defend, which is why I think Tag played 0 minutes, Miller had what, 20+ rebounds? 19? and he provided us with some points. I think not playing Tag was fine.
That Bonner guy (who I've never heard of) was taking outside shots and hitting them, Tag is too slow to run out to the outside and defend, which is why I think Tag played 0 minutes, Miller had what, 20+ rebounds? 19? and he provided us with some points. I think not playing Tag was fine.
Yeah I agree but that does flay in the face of conventional wisdom of coaching. Putting Tag in might have helped and could not have hurt, but give adelman props for palyeing Evans, Song and Martin once the starters shwed they could not get it done. More props for the bench getting the team back in there.
Brad got a career high rebound...18!!! Congrats Brad!!! 
The free throwing shooting really killed us tonight! If we could have made half of them, the percent of winning was very good. Looks like this game was just meant to not be a W. Nothing was going right.
Gary Gearld said on the radio that if Raptors scored of 95+ pts, all fans at the game gets free pizza! They got 96 pts... so pizza to everyone...even the Kings fans at the game.
Two more games left on the road...need to take care of them. A 3-1 on this roadtrip would be great! GO KINGS!!
The free throwing shooting really killed us tonight!
If we could have made half of them, the percent of winning was very good. Looks like this game was just meant to not be a W. Nothing was going right. Gary Gearld said on the radio that if Raptors scored of 95+ pts, all fans at the game gets free pizza! They got 96 pts... so pizza to everyone...even the Kings fans at the game.
Two more games left on the road...need to take care of them. A 3-1 on this roadtrip would be great! GO KINGS!!
(1) Toronto had 16 offensive rebounds (Tag's domain)
(2) Tag would defenitely not made it worse
(3) Brad can play PF
(4) Other than Bibby - nobody did tonight. Tag would not have wasted so many balls.
(5) We missed 12 FT's so that argument is weak
-----------------------------------------------------------------
(1) That only works if Your name is RA
(2) where do You draw the line here. Is there anybody on the bench who can tell them to stop
(3) that worked well
(4) that is speculation at best. If You keep them out is shows respect to the players who brought the team back ion the game
(2) Tag would defenitely not made it worse
(3) Brad can play PF
(4) Other than Bibby - nobody did tonight. Tag would not have wasted so many balls.
(5) We missed 12 FT's so that argument is weak
-----------------------------------------------------------------
(1) That only works if Your name is RA
(2) where do You draw the line here. Is there anybody on the bench who can tell them to stop
(3) that worked well
(4) that is speculation at best. If You keep them out is shows respect to the players who brought the team back ion the game
Variant said:
Sigh... no excuses in my mind. These are the types of losses that come back to bite you at the end of the year when you lose home court advantage by 1 game to your first round opponent.
Back to back? Sure... this game was winnable except that we didn't start playing until the last 8 minutes or so.
Back to back? Sure... this game was winnable except that we didn't start playing until the last 8 minutes or so.
My thoughts exactly. I'd rather lose to an eastern conference team on the road in second game of back to back than any game to a western conference team (home or away).
Peja and Webb were off and our FT were off and we lost. Win against SA was huge, loss to Raptors on the road... I could care less (well I care a little)
Peja and Webb were off and our FT were off and we lost. Win against SA was huge, loss to Raptors on the road... I could care less (well I care a little)
Last edited:
- Status