Section 101
All-Star
Sactown Royalty @sactownroyalty 3h3 hours ago
Reggie Evans is the only player on the Kings roster to have played for George Karl and he loves him http://sbnation.com/e/7773064
Quincy Miller says Hi.
Sactown Royalty @sactownroyalty 3h3 hours ago
Reggie Evans is the only player on the Kings roster to have played for George Karl and he loves him http://sbnation.com/e/7773064
I'm starting to question why Karl would even want to be here. He has to be a tad desperate to voluntarily come here.
He must not think there will be many openings this summer. Surely he can do better than this.
he challenged Carmelo to get double doubles often, and get his butt deeper into the paint.
People assume Karl is an up-tempo style of coach but to me, it looks like he is more of a guy who will adjust his coaching style based on his personnel. I wouldn't be surprised to see Karl slow the pace down here.
Karl adjusts his style to personnel. The Carmelo Nuggets were a slower paced, good defensive team with Camby and Kenyon Martin both in their primes. After that his stupidly deep team post melo ran up and down because they had no go to scorers in the half court and Lawson, Faried and Igoudala with shooters around them. Karl will get the best out of Cousins and Gay my question is what can he get out of the rest of the roster. Guys like Sessions, JT, Landry, Casspi, Stauskas, Ray. I'm certain his offensive schemes will pay huge dividends for Ben too to emerge as that 3rd scorer.
That would be helpful as Reggie has Cuz's ear.
I'm starting to question why Karl would even want to be here. He has to be a tad desperate to voluntarily come here.
He must not think there will be many openings this summer. Surely he can do better than this.
Karl adjusts his style to personnel. The Carmelo Nuggets were a slower paced, good defensive team with Camby and Kenyon Martin both in their primes. After that his stupidly deep team post melo ran up and down because they had no go to scorers in the half court and Lawson, Faried and Igoudala with shooters around them. Karl will get the best out of Cousins and Gay my question is what can he get out of the rest of the roster. Guys like Sessions, JT, Landry, Casspi, Stauskas, Ray. I'm certain his offensive schemes will pay huge dividends for Ben too to emerge as that 3rd scorer.
One thing that might be going under the radar with bringing in Karl, is the potential very positive effect for Rudy Gay. I have a feeling he's going to get the best out of Rudy
You're right and I think PDA might be displeased at some point. Excuse my posting of Karl articles but I'm sifting through some material on him right now and this applies to the conversation.Karl adjusts his style to personnel.
This could easily be it's own thread.
Stop using social media and paying attention to ESPN bs. It'll be just like 10 years ago.
You're right and I think PDA might be displeased at some point. Excuse my posting of Karl articles but I'm sifting through some material on him right now and this applies to the conversation.
He’s pigeonholed now as someone whose offensive philosophy amounts to “outrun an opponent until they can’t breathe,” but that’s not really accurate. Karl had very little history as a proprietor of a fast-paced offense until arriving in Denver, where he correctly concluded a speed game would work best with young, athletic rosters playing in mile-high air. We remember Karl’s Seattle teams as helter-skelter transition machines, but in only two of Karl’s seven seasons there did the Sonics rank above the league average in possessions per game — i.e., pace. Those Seattle teams pioneered an aggressive style of trapping, chaotic defense that was ahead of its time, with zone-ish principles and heavy switching that made it difficult for offenses accustomed to dictating the terms of engagement. The Sonics ran opportunistically off turnovers their defense created, but with the exception of those two fast-paced seasons, they were not a Denver-style “run at all costs” bunch.
And Karl’s Milwaukee teams were mostly slowpokes, and yet still managed to rank in the top 10 in points per possession in each of his five seasons there.
Point is: Karl, on offense, is adaptable. Just because the Nuggets ran like all hell does not mean Karl would be a bad bit for snails like the Nets and Grizzlies. And while Karl’s Denver offenses looked almost simplistic, they gradually gained the excited admiration of the NBA’s more analytics-oriented front-office folks. Karl understood that his offense generated the most efficient shots available — shots at the rim, and 3-pointers — and on an even deeper level, he was early in understanding that NBA defenses were evolving in ways that made scoring in the half-court a more difficult job. He was also ahead of the curve in getting that post-up plays, while appealing in a traditional way, are a very low-efficiency strategy without really good post-up players to run them.
I'm not at all convinced we'll see something like we saw in Den under him, not with Cuz here. He's a smart guy, a creative guy and I don't see him taking the rock out of Cuz's hands. That's foolish. You're not going to get an efficient offense and maximize Cuz by having him jacking up jumpers non-stop like we've seen under Corbin. And to maximize spacing, which Karl is very good at would require getting Cuz in the post and spacing off him. What I expect is Cuz to be the focus of our offense much as Webber was under Rick, with better spacing and movement off Cuz than we've seen.
I fully expect some roster movement this summer and the acquisition of some 3&D guys to space off Cuz. The corner 3 will be important. I'd also hope, and he's valued them before, that he'd want a defensive presence next to Cuz, something like a Kenyon Martin or even going back to Irvin Johnson. Actually, Karl has almost always had a pretty good defensive big and a number of times multiple, guys who'll do the dirty work. My guess is Oct 1st, Ben is still here and DC isn't. DC doesn't strike me as his type of starting PG. With Karl I could see us going hard after Dragic.
WTF YOUR PROFILE PICTUREI apologize. I meant to say that he has never failed to reach .500 in a full season since the 80's.
WTF YOUR PROFILE PICTURE
Perhaps, you can draw a line from Rudy to Melo, but Rudy's penchant for the midrange jumper as a core element may not work. In fact really, if George Karl's normal post and three system is brought in, both Collison and Rudy's core midrange pullups will be a question.
You're right and I think PDA might be displeased at some point. Excuse my posting of Karl articles but I'm sifting through some material on him right now and this applies to the conversation.
He’s pigeonholed now as someone whose offensive philosophy amounts to “outrun an opponent until they can’t breathe,” but that’s not really accurate. Karl had very little history as a proprietor of a fast-paced offense until arriving in Denver, where he correctly concluded a speed game would work best with young, athletic rosters playing in mile-high air. We remember Karl’s Seattle teams as helter-skelter transition machines, but in only two of Karl’s seven seasons there did the Sonics rank above the league average in possessions per game — i.e., pace. Those Seattle teams pioneered an aggressive style of trapping, chaotic defense that was ahead of its time, with zone-ish principles and heavy switching that made it difficult for offenses accustomed to dictating the terms of engagement. The Sonics ran opportunistically off turnovers their defense created, but with the exception of those two fast-paced seasons, they were not a Denver-style “run at all costs” bunch.
And Karl’s Milwaukee teams were mostly slowpokes, and yet still managed to rank in the top 10 in points per possession in each of his five seasons there.
Point is: Karl, on offense, is adaptable. Just because the Nuggets ran like all hell does not mean Karl would be a bad bit for snails like the Nets and Grizzlies. And while Karl’s Denver offenses looked almost simplistic, they gradually gained the excited admiration of the NBA’s more analytics-oriented front-office folks. Karl understood that his offense generated the most efficient shots available — shots at the rim, and 3-pointers — and on an even deeper level, he was early in understanding that NBA defenses were evolving in ways that made scoring in the half-court a more difficult job. He was also ahead of the curve in getting that post-up plays, while appealing in a traditional way, are a very low-efficiency strategy without really good post-up players to run them.
I'm not at all convinced we'll see something like we saw in Den under him, not with Cuz here. He's a smart guy, a creative guy and I don't see him taking the rock out of Cuz's hands. That's foolish. You're not going to get an efficient offense and maximize Cuz by having him jacking up jumpers non-stop like we've seen under Corbin. And to maximize spacing, which Karl is very good at would require getting Cuz in the post and spacing off him. What I expect is Cuz to be the focus of our offense much as Webber was under Rick, with better spacing and movement off Cuz than we've seen.
I fully expect some roster movement this summer and the acquisition of some 3&D guys to space off Cuz. The corner 3 will be important. I'd also hope, and he's valued them before, that he'd want a defensive presence next to Cuz, something like a Kenyon Martin or even going back to Irvin Johnson. Actually, Karl has almost always had a pretty good defensive big and a number of times multiple, guys who'll do the dirty work. My guess is Oct 1st, Ben is still here and DC isn't. DC doesn't strike me as his type of starting PG. With Karl I could see us going hard after Dragic.
Certainly, one big point in the Karl adjusts his strategy to his team situation argument can be the simply fact that playing fastpaced transition ball while at a high altitude can simply exhaust a visiting team. That all said, I'm not so sure that Karl's freeflowing offensive system is perfect for a Kings team that has a tendency to implode whenever it's given the reigns on offense.
Well,I don't know how much slower he actually ran things at any point in Denver. He was the rodent's wet dream.
Pace during DEN years:
2012-13 DEN 2nd of 30
2011-12 DEN 2nd of 30
2010-11 DEN 2nd of 30
2009-10 DEN 5th of 30
2008-09 DEN 6th of 30
2007-08 DEN 1st of 30
2006-07 DEN 2nd of 30
2005-06 DEN 2nd of 30
2004-05 DEN 4th of 30 (took over midseason)
Now what I think would be jsut cool is for the rodent to get his comeuppance, to not realize that Denver Karl was not always George Karl. In Milwaulkee his pace ranged form 10th to 22nd. Solidly middle of the road. In Seattle, he had 2 seasons ranked 3rd, and then 5 seasons ranked in the 14th to 19th range.
If we get Denver George, that is NOT a good or reasonable fit for a big center. It wastes them, tires them out. But there have been other Georges. I would be amused to see reasonable pace George show up and leave whiskered little noses twitching in dismay throughout the Sleep Train rat warrens.
I'm not sure why we need to try to find a player in the past who Karl coached, who is like anyone on our current roster? You're not going to find another point guard who is just like Gary Payton....and neither another post player like Cousins. So what?
Rick Adelman had never coached a power forward with Chris Webber's skillset....until they happened to be on the same team and their talents came together. In other words, a good experienced coach should have no problem getting the most out of a talented player, if they're both fully focused on doing whatever it takes to win
He won the western conference in Seattle and was a contender every season there... and they didn't use a "free flowing" or "run n gun" system, with that particular roster
The Glove is still the Glove (i.e. a crazy person)