Kevin_Martin_23
G-League
Now what are you implying? We didn't have Kevin martin in the game that we beat LA.Ok we beat the Lakers whats your point we didnt beat the lakers with squad we used last vs the grizz
Now what are you implying? We didn't have Kevin martin in the game that we beat LA.Ok we beat the Lakers whats your point we didnt beat the lakers with squad we used last vs the grizz
Do i hate donte no but everyone acts like he adamn god sent when hes really no he average at best
As someone said on here. his negatives outweighed his positives.What is with the lack of recognition for Salmons? The guy was the Kings' best player. Not only was he the best penetrator, he was their best defensive player. He was often the only guy who could create on his own. Noc is an overpaid Garcia. Of course this team will miss what Salmons brought, because this team doesn't have anybody who will play defense, or create their own shot, or get to the basket.
What is with the lack of recognition for Salmons? The guy was the Kings' best player. Not only was he the best penetrator, he was their best defensive player. He was often the only guy who could create on his own. Noc is an overpaid Garcia. Of course this team will miss what Salmons brought, because this team doesn't have anybody who will play defense, or create their own shot, or get to the basket.
What is with the lack of recognition for Salmons? The guy was the Kings' best player. Not only was he the best penetrator, he was their best defensive player. He was often the only guy who could create on his own. Noc is an overpaid Garcia. Of course this team will miss what Salmons brought, because this team doesn't have anybody who will play defense, or create their own shot, or get to the basket.
Exactly! Garcia = role player. Every team needs a Garcia. However, we now have two Garcia type players, and both are overpaid (IMO). Salmons was an Artest "light", he was a ball hog at times, but was the ONLY person on our team that would play defense and create their own shot. Martin? Garcia? Hawes? Thompson? None of these people can create their own shot.
Exactly! Garcia = role player. Every team needs a Garcia. However, we now have two Garcia type players, and both are overpaid (IMO). Salmons was an Artest "light", he was a ball hog at times, but was the ONLY person on our team that would play defense and create their own shot. Martin? Garcia? Hawes? Thompson? None of these people can create their own shot.
Artest light? You're giving him way too much credit at that point.. Artest was unguardable where salmons was. Artest was a shutdown defender, Salmons was a good one yea but not shutdown level of Artest.
JT is a rookie, Hawes is 20? 21? Donte is just now 21? Why don't you give these kids some time
Exactly! Garcia = role player. Every team needs a Garcia. However, we now have two Garcia type players, and both are overpaid (IMO). Salmons was an Artest "light", he was a ball hog at times, but was the ONLY person on our team that would play defense and create their own shot. Martin? Garcia? Hawes? Thompson? None of these people can create their own shot.
Exactly! Garcia = role player. Every team needs a Garcia. However, we now have two Garcia type players, and both are overpaid (IMO). Salmons was an Artest "light", he was a ball hog at times, but was the ONLY person on our team that would play defense and create their own shot. Martin? Garcia? Hawes? Thompson? None of these people can create their own shot.
Unfortunately for people who share that viewpoint, you aren't getting the point that the positives John brought aren't so readily brought by others. Sure, he could be a black hole and turn the ball over, but so can everybody else. The flip side is that the positives he brought aren't things anybody else on the team does. Eventually, the Kings will need a player who can bring those things on offense and defense.As someone said on here. his negatives outweighed his positives.
Considering Nocioni has spent around 30 hrs on airplanes past couple days, from Chicago to Sac to Dallas and then arrives with no practice - not bad. Played 30 mins, 10pts, 3 assists, 7 boards, 4 fouls - vocal D, hard arse D, on Dirk.
Doesn't that make it that much more impressive when he limited his opposition? When you are all alone on defense, and can still stop top scorers, that's impressive.salmons is being dubbed as a good defender cause he is in a team with no defense outside garcia...
Unfortunately for people who think like you, you aren't grasping that the positives John brought aren't so readily brought by others. Sure, he could be a black hole and turn the ball over, but so can everybody else. The flip side is that he did things nobody else on the team does.
We mentioned it earlier, but hearing him yell "High pick! High pick" bought him a lot of immediate respect in my book. I actually played it back at least 6-8 times to make sure my ears hadn't deceived me.
-------------
As far as Salmons goes, he was the right player in the wrong place. And he wasn't going to fit in for the future, unless we wanted to get rid of Garcia and Donte Greene. People are praising his defense like he was DPOY or something. He was a big fish in a little pool, so to speak, when it came to defense. It's real easy to be the best at something on a team of guys who have no idea what defense is, let alone how to play it.
And I'm not cutting on John Salmons. I liked him. He had a singular mindset, however, that didn't include looking for open teammates, recognizing a collapsing defense and getting rid of the ball, etc. And we're all well aware that he just didn't perform well unless he started. What would we have done if we ended up with a legitimate starting small forward? Put Salmons on the bench and watch him sour and fade?
We mentioned it earlier, but hearing him yell "High pick! High pick" bought him a lot of immediate respect in my book. I actually played it back at least 6-8 times to make sure my ears hadn't deceived me.
-------------
As far as Salmons goes, he was the right player in the wrong place. And he wasn't going to fit in for the future, unless we wanted to get rid of Garcia and Donte Greene. People are praising his defense like he was DPOY or something. He was a big fish in a little pool, so to speak, when it came to defense. It's real easy to be the best at something on a team of guys who have no idea what defense is, let alone how to play it.
And I'm not cutting on John Salmons. I liked him. He had a singular mindset, however, that didn't include looking for open teammates, recognizing a collapsing defense and getting rid of the ball, etc. And we're all well aware that he just didn't perform well unless he started. What would we have done if we ended up with a legitimate starting small forward? Put Salmons on the bench and watch him sour and fade?
But they don't.
Not to his level at least.
If Garcia, Martin, Thompson, Hawes or anyone else don't get their shots they don't go into shutdown mode.
Salmons attitude was deplorable.
That attitude of his is a downfall. That single negative (in addition to everything else) killed whatever positives he brought.
I don't care about his production, because after the crap he pulled last year he was enemy number one in my eyes.
I just don't get where the viewpoint came from that the team is better off without Salmons. When did he turn into Artest in that department?
Addition by subtraction.
The guy was such a "me me me me!" player that it hurt everyone around him.
Look at the record of us as a team with Salmons as a "Number One" or "Best Player"
It wasn't working, and something NEEDED to be done.
Getting rid of him was the right thing to do.
What's our record with Martin as a "Number One" or "Best Player"?
What's our record with Martin as a "Number One" or "Best Player"?
This game Donte was still very trigger happy from the 3 point line, but it was good to see him dribble and drive a bit. One time he had a good drive, but wasn't sure if he should dunk or try a layup and he missed, but I am totally fine with that as this is a development period.