[Game] Kings @ Jazz - Dec. 7 - 6 p.m. PST

When you got up this morning and looked out the window, what did you see?


  • Total voters
    26
More effective than the 4-13 record Cousins and Vasquez have led this team to, yes.

And I didn't say they are always effective. I didn't say it was perfect. I just think saying they can't play together suggests they .. can't. Which they can. They have. They won tonight playing together.
And they've lost a lot too. Also, this was the jazz minus favors for chrissakes.
 
Good game Kings fans. Heartbreaking loss. I really thought we had it won but you guys made your shots to tie it and we just ran out of steam in the overtime.
 
Thomas mildly struggles with entry passes. Seriously? that is where we draw the line?

But the other guy's inability to shoot or defend is totally ok because he has a .. 10% higher entry pass success rate? 20%? it realistically can't be much higher than that.
Describing the struggles as "mild" are understating them by an order of magnitude... As far as this specific game is concerned, we had to go to overtime because we didn't have anyone on the court that could get the ball to DeMarcus Cousins in the last 5-6 minutes of regulation. That is, ostensibly, the point guard's job. And, when you have a star-in-the-making. like Cousins, it's arguably his most important job.
 
Uh... yeah. When it comes to point guards, the ability of a point guard to get the ball to the star player, where the star is most effective is, in fact, the way we judge that point guard's ability to play with that star.

For whatever else he can't do, Vasquez does that better than anybody else we've got on the team, by a lot.

Just to add, when Cousins was abusing poor Enes, every entry pass came from someone other than IT. THAT'S the point (pun intended).
 
Thomas mildly struggles with entry passes. Seriously? that is where we draw the line?

But the other guy's inability to shoot or defend is totally ok because he has a .. 10% higher entry pass success rate? 20%? it realistically can't be much higher than that.

No, it is not OK that GV sucks but it is the most efficient use of what we have on our team.
 
Describing the struggles as "mild" are understating them by an order of magnitude... As far as this specific game is concerned, we had to go to overtime because we didn't have anyone on the court that could get the ball to DeMarcus Cousins in the last 5-6 minutes of regulation. That is, ostensibly, the point guard's job. And, when you have a star-in-the-making. like Cousins, it's arguably his most important job.

I just disagree that that is why we went to overtime. A million different things caused that game to go into overtime. If Cousins didn't get into early foul trouble overtime could have been avoided. If our starting point guard could produce more than 4 pts and 4 ast overtime could have been avoided, etc.

The team couldn't get Cousins the ball effectively in crunch time. We all wanted the ball to go there. No doubt about it, but that is one flaw in one particular game, for a 5-6 minute stretch. I'm not basing big picture stuff on that. I'm not saying they can't play together because of that.

But I know where you stand. I can disagree and still respect the opinion.
 
well atleast there's no Flopper and Faker fans here
Draftee_Daffy1.JPG


Well, now, I wouldn't say that...
 
I have learned IT can never please some of the people on the board here...

IT is one of the best 6th men in the league. He can't play every minute. I shudder to think what our bench would be like if GV was there. I honestly don't know what you want.
 
Just to add, when Cousins was abusing poor Enes, every entry pass came from someone other than IT. THAT'S the point (pun intended).

No, what we did is fine. Teams do it all the time. That is an argument FOR Thomas, not against him.

Thomas was struggling to get the ball inside. Lucky for us basketball isn't a 2 on 2 game. Salmons was out there at the time and he settled things down getting the ball inside to Cousins. There is nothing inherently wrong with that. That's just smart basketball.
 
I just disagree that that is why we went to overtime. A million different things caused that game to go into overtime. If Cousins didn't get into early foul trouble overtime could have been avoided. If our starting point guard could produce more than 4 pts and 4 ast overtime could have been avoided, etc.

The team couldn't get Cousins the ball effectively in crunch time. We all wanted the ball to go there. No doubt about it, but that is one flaw in one particular game, for a 5-6 minute stretch. I'm not basing big picture stuff on that. I'm not saying they can't play together because of that.

But I know where you stand. I can disagree and still respect the opinion.

Agree once again. Besides, an entry pass from the top of the key is the hardest way to get the ball into the post. So I'm not so sure why that would want IT making passes from there. I also don't remember many possesions where IT was on the wing and failed to get the ball to Cousins. Did anyone count how many entry passes IT could or couldn't make? Was 20? 10? 4? 2?
 
I have learned IT can never please some of the people on the board here...
And I have learned that some people on this board will never be happy until the rest of us wash Thomas' feet. It will never be enough for them that we acknowledge that he's the best sixth man in the league this season; they won't be satisfied until we become "Pizza Guys," too, and demand that he start.
 
There are several laker fans here; you may not have noticed because
  1. They aren't trolls, and
  2. They haven't posted much lately.
 
Back
Top