This is such a disrespectful statement from Dave. People might disagree with you, that doesn't mean they were "triggered". There is a way to frame that statement without insinuating that anyone who disagrees is being irrational.
My question is, when a fanbase consistently turns on their highest paid player for over 20 years and makes them the source of the problem regardless of age, position, skillset, or even team record (the team was still winning when this happened to CWebb) ... at what point do we just have to admit that the fanbase itself is toxic?