[KINGS] Comments that don't warrant their own thread (Redux)
- Thread starter Section 101
- Start date
Don't know where else to post this, so this seems like a good place. I was super excited before the season started to come up to Sacramento on MLK weekend to catch one or both games vs. the Rockets.
After the last 10 games, I'm sorely reconsidering that decision. This team makes me not feel like flying across the state to watch them.
Rant over.
After the last 10 games, I'm sorely reconsidering that decision. This team makes me not feel like flying across the state to watch them.
Rant over.
I assume they mean in the off-season right?
https://clutchpoints.com/kings-rumo...g-two-warriors-assistants-as-next-head-coach/
https://clutchpoints.com/kings-rumo...g-two-warriors-assistants-as-next-head-coach/
But what about
Winning Percentage
W: 0.353
G: 0.500
Maybe one 27-point blowout in a SmALL SAmpLe SiZe of four games does make a big difference, even though the team as a whole seems to have exhibited better effort.
And, for the shocker, maybe the point of firing Walton wasn't to replace him with "a better coach (??)" in Gentry, maybe the point of firing Walton was to get his imprint off of the organization and give us a chance to start our coaching search for next season nice and early. Maybe the point of firing Walton was to get somebody in place who would be willing to develop Bagley so we can see what to do with him at the trade deadline or in the offseason, rather than just let him rot on the bench due to some coach-player grudge.
As several have pointed out, there may not be a lot of hope in fixing this particular roster, but if the coach has lost the team, he's gotta go. Is there anybody who thinks Walton HADN'T lost the team? Anybody?
Winning Percentage
W: 0.353
G: 0.500
Maybe one 27-point blowout in a SmALL SAmpLe SiZe of four games does make a big difference, even though the team as a whole seems to have exhibited better effort.
And, for the shocker, maybe the point of firing Walton wasn't to replace him with "a better coach (??)" in Gentry, maybe the point of firing Walton was to get his imprint off of the organization and give us a chance to start our coaching search for next season nice and early. Maybe the point of firing Walton was to get somebody in place who would be willing to develop Bagley so we can see what to do with him at the trade deadline or in the offseason, rather than just let him rot on the bench due to some coach-player grudge.
As several have pointed out, there may not be a lot of hope in fixing this particular roster, but if the coach has lost the team, he's gotta go. Is there anybody who thinks Walton HADN'T lost the team? Anybody?
We are currently 25th in the league in 3 point percentage. Since we are still working our way into being a decent defending team, we need to be in the top 15 at least from distance. We are 4 percentages below last year. Fox and and TD appear to be on the rise and I assume we will see a bit of a lower percentage from Hali since he is finally taking his share of shots.
If we are going to hold steady with this squad, I hope Monte finds another guy that can shoot at the deadline. Let's also hope Off Night can find himself in the low to mid 30s for the rest of the year.
If we are going to hold steady with this squad, I hope Monte finds another guy that can shoot at the deadline. Let's also hope Off Night can find himself in the low to mid 30s for the rest of the year.
