[Game] Kings at Bucks, 1/22/2022 4pm PT/7pm ET

Status
Not open for further replies.
Milwauke averages 112 points per game, so they scored 18% above their average. Given how they’ve operated, with Fox playing and Hali sitting, they would’ve ended up scoring 28%+ or around 143, Percentages vs raw numbers, dude.

LOL.

This is literal gibberish with not an ounce of actual good statistical backing.
 
Prove why it’s jibberish. I can back my data. Can you?

I don't need to back crap. Your "data" isn't data. It's made up nonsense based on your feelings of what would happen and thinking because something happened in the past that it'll continue exactly that way. Causation does not = correlation fella
 
I don't need to back crap. Your "data" isn't data. It's made up nonsense based on your feelings of what would happen and thinking because something happened in the past that it'll continue exactly that way.

What’s made up? My data is pure.

Look at you running backwards.
 
Purely made up, yep. It's not on me to "prove" why your nonsense gibberish is gibberish.

"The sky is green"

"No, it's actually blue"

"Nope, my data is pure. Prove it isn't."

What's the point?

If you’ve done any modeling, you’d challenge me on my confidence intervals and the number of iterations, which run on R or on Monte Carlo or Excel. The more iterations, the beefier the confidence. But you resort to opinion and ignorance.
 
Honestly, what part of those calcs were made up. Seriously, do tell.

What calcs? You didn't show any sort of statistical model proving your point? You found a trend that supports your argument, that's all. Doesn't prove crap, nor does it predict anything that's going to happen in the future.

You want to prove something? Show the sample size with Fox alone vs Hali alone. Show the pace differential. Show the opposing team offensive numbers. Even then, what the hell does that show? Both guys have played with vastly different supporting casts alone and you have to model for opponent strength as well. AND I doubt there's enough of a minute sample for any of this to matter anyway.

Thus, gibberish.
 
What calcs? You didn't show any sort of statistical model proving your point? You found a trend that supports your argument, that's all. Doesn't prove crap, nor does it predict anything that's going to happen in the future.

You want to prove something? Show the sample size with Fox alone vs Hali alone. Show the pace differential. Show the opposing team offensive numbers. Even then, what the hell does that show? Both guys have played with vastly different supporting casts alone and you have to model for opponent strength as well. AND I doubt there's enough of a minute sample for any of this to matter anyway.

Thus, gibberish.

Dude, I gave you the entire population for the 21-22 season. Do you know the difference between sample size and population?
 
Why should I care about what? 7 games max for Fox alone and Hali alone? That doesn't show anything.

Ahh, okay. So now it’s not about sample sizes, but only what u care about, which is the beginning and the end of this little outburst.
 
I want the Rams to win. Did you read my post. Making a small, quant based bet is toilet paper.

Grew up in LA a Rams fan and hated the 49ers especially after the beat the Rams in the NFC Championship game. Cheering for the 49ers against the Rams will be like if you all moved to LA and the Kings - Lakers played in the Western Conference finals in 10-15 years.
 
Grew up in LA a Rams fan and hated the 49ers especially after the beat the Rams in the NFC Championship game. Cheering for the 49ers against the Rams will be like if you all moved to LA and the Kings - Lakers played in the Western Conference finals in 10-15 years.

I have a handful of LA guys, who are Niner fans. Their LA teams moved away then moved back and moved away again. Hence the Niner allegiance. Beyond that, they’re 100% so cal. I’m nor cal all the way.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top