I agree completely. Jimmer struggled his first year of college as well. But to his credit, he improved every year. I would expect him to play better tonight. There were several times in last nights game where he was being guarded by Gilchrist, and a few times by Taylor. both those guys would give anyone in the league trouble, much less a young PG still trying to figure things out. People are so quick to judge and discard. If anyone remember's Dirk Nowitzki's first year in the league, you'll remember there were nights where the home crowd booed him. He struggled mightilly his first year. Steve Nash didn't look like Nash until his 5th year in the league.
As you said, I'm willing to give him this year and next, and if nothing changes by then, we let him go or trade him. Its not like he's costing us an arm and a leg. He's hardly the major problem with the team. It would nice if he turned out to be an asset though.
I see what you're saying, and I do think Jimmer can contribute in this league, but let me disagree a little bit with the Nash/Dirk comparison. I think those two should be compared more to a guy like Reke, in that the talent was there, it was just getting up to the flow/speed of an NBA game.
I do think Jimmer has a place in this league, but more and more I think it's an off the ball, Reddick type role. When comparing Jimmer to Nash in his earlier years, of course Nash wasn't near the player he is today, but I think a lot of that is how well he reads the game at this point. But when Nash came into the league eventhough he wasn't reading the game at the same speed he now does, his handle was still damn good and he was pretty quick.
He had to over time learn where his spots would be and then develop runners/one-footers/step backs for when he got to those spots, but with Nash I never saw an inability with his handle or speed to get to those spots, which is what I see with Jimmer. Parker is another example of a guy who had the speed/handle when he arrived, but it took a few years to figure out where his spots would be, when to attack, when to pull it out, when to give it to Duncan, etc, but the actual ability to get to those spots wasn't ever in question.
I don't like the Dirk comparison because his game was never dependent on needing an improved handle to get to his spots. It was more post work and foot work to get his shot off. With Jimmer there is now doubt of whether he even has the tools to ever get to the spots he needs to, let alone go through the experience of how to execute when he does get to those spots down the road. The NBA is about windows, just like receivers in football, where the game is so fast and the guys are so big you need to know where those windows are and be ready to do whatever it is you do when you get to those windows, as they higher the level the quicker they close. The better the player, the more windows there are, as they see opportunities where less talented players don't. But can Jimmer even get to where those windows for NBA PG's are? It's a valid question at this point.
I hope for the best with Jimmer, but I really don't think a guy his age will all the sudden improve his handle that much. I'd love for him to do it, but it's not something I've seen with NBA players. I've yet to see an NBA PG who had trouble even getting into a position to set up the offense, improve his handle enough to become a successful rotational PG, let alone a starting PG. I would love to see what would happen with Jimmer's confidence if we played him off the ball, off screens, let him concentrate on what he does best, shooting, and let his confidence build. I really do think we're doing a disservice to Jimmer by forcing him to run the team. But, we'll see where it goes, it was only the first summer league game.