Chupacabra
Starter
It doesnt matter. We didnt get it. FAIL. If you cant get that kind of value then you dont trade him.And who exactly would've given us that all star talent in exchange for Kevin?
It doesnt matter. We didnt get it. FAIL. If you cant get that kind of value then you dont trade him.And who exactly would've given us that all star talent in exchange for Kevin?
It doesnt matter. We didnt get it. FAIL. If you cant get that kind of value then you dont trade him.
Petrie is better at drafting players. Look at his recent history for signing/trading players:
1/11/10 - Acquires Hilton Armstrong from NO for a 2016 2nd-round pick + cash
6/25/09 - Trades the 31st pick in the 2009 draft for Sergio + 38th pick
2/19/09 - Trades Shelden Williams to MN for a 2014 2nd-round pick
2/18/09 - Trades John Salmons & Brad Miller for Ike Diogu, Andres Nocioni, Cedric Simmons, Drew Gooden
2/17/09 - Acquires Sam Cassell from Boston for a 2015 2nd-round pick
8/14/08 - Trades Ron Artest & Sean Singletary for Donte Green, Bobby Jackson, 2009 1st-round pick
2/16/08 - Trades Mike Bibby for Shelden Williams, Lorenzen Wright, Anthony Johnson, Tyronn Lue, 2008 2nd-round pick
Landry Age:26 Contract: $3,000,000
27.2min 16.1pts (.547 FG% .000 3pt% .839 FT%) 5.5reb 0.8ast 0.5stl 0.9blk 1.6TO
We're better off without him and with Landry. Now if we could get more and settled for Landry, then sure, bad trade. But if the market was soft and we could not get more, then we did well. We got better, and apparently about as much better as we could get.
You are apparently clinging to an unrealistic appraisal of how much Kevin could bring back. Teams just weren't that high on him. Didn't like the injuries, didn't like the contract, didn't like the defense. And I'll say this too: while Kevin is the better talent if you don't take into account fit, Carl Landry has been a better player than Kevin this season by just about any standard, numbers, impact, or anything in between. And he's certainly a better fit for us both by position and personality. Not to mention being much cheaper.
Landry Age:26 Contract: $3,000,000
27.2min 16.1pts (.547 FG% .000 3pt% .839 FT%) 5.5reb 0.8ast 0.5stl 0.9blk 1.6TO
Martin Age:27 Contract: $10,800,000
35.2min 19.8pts (.398 FG% .355 3pt% .819 FT%) 4.3reb 2.6ast 1.0stl 0.2blk 1.6TO
aall trades do take time for the results to matter. thats why i dont really like grades right after a trade.
My biggest dissapointment was we couldnt get rid of noch's contract...
Thats my only problem with the trade deadline deals, I wish somebody would take him. I'm eagerly anticipating the day when Cassipi and Greene can share the 3 without worrying about Nocioni.
One of the most common reasons for a trade is overlapping or not conducive talent. When you have a overabundance of a certain type of talent its easy to be made better by trading it away even for lesser talent. That is what i feel happened with this trade. The quality of player we traded away was not equal to what we received, even though the talent we received is a better fit for this team.
If you're going to put a grade on a trade you have to give it now with what you know, not later. Decision are base on what you know at the time not what you know in the future.