RE: Bricks post,
Lots I disagree with. One main disagreement being the perception that this team is unlikely to once again be among the worst in the league next year. The young bigs still give up as much if not more than they get, and I don't see that changing in the immediate future. A resurrected Red Auerbach isn't going to teach these guys to play defense in one years time. Additionally, the other bottom-dwellers, imo, are better situated to win more games next year than we are. Washington, with a healthy Arenas should be much better; Ok. City, possessing a guy with a chance at eventual super-stardom in Durant, is already clearly better; even the Clippers, it could be argued, have more in the cubbard than we do. I don't want to get into a semantic battle as to what "prime shot" at a top pick means, but this team, as currently constructed, could easily be a bottom five team next year, and i believe bottom two or three. Better coaching could help, yes, but imo the impact head-coaches have on games is a bit overstated. Give even the Motley-crew of coaches we have had in the last few years better talent and suddenly they would appear a heck of allot smarter/more competent.
Regarding the Eddie Jordan comment-- he may in fact be able to take a team to .500, (the stretch of years where he reached the playoffs surely supporting said claim) but the Wizards going 1-10 to start this season and Jordan finding himself unemployed after that stretch, doesn't seem to imply he has a magic potion to raise our similarly talent starved team from the ashes. The only goal of this franchise should be to contend for a championship, and the only way that is ever going to happen is if we can acquire a superstar. The odds in the draft may not be so great, but at least it is a chance. You gotta play the cards you're dealt, as the saying goes.
Regarding the Maloofs reengaging--this is a good thing, how? The taxpayers have spoken and, at this point, it seems the fate of any potential arena deal will be worked out in backrooms by bureaucrats and businessmen, and not the Kings fan base.
Regarding Hedo as "special case"-- The ties to the golden years are irrelevant to what kind of impact Hedo can have on this team in the record column, and more importantly, on placing the Kings back on the road to relevancy. The long term answer to the attendance problems isn't bringing back aging former stars to provide short term spikes to ticket sales, but for the Kings to put a product on the floor that achieves national spotlight on its own merits, instead of chasing the ghosts of eras gone by.
The old cliché about taking one step back so you can later take several steps forward, finds its opposite in the potential signing of Hedo. All the goodwill engendered by bringing back Hedo will be both minor and short lived--the warm and fuzzies won't last when, after the losses once again start to pile up, fans realize the team has just spent its resources on a) a player who is 30 and whose statistics are in decline(take a moment and compare Hedo's stats this year to last) and b) in giving said player his contract, we have lost the ability to make an impact free-agent signing when we are again ready to truly matter. Even accepting the premise that we won't be bad enough to nab another Top 3 pick, losing the financial flexibility to take on a contract-- say next year at the trade deadline as teams attempt to join the Lebron, Amare, etc. sweepstakes-- would be a bitter pill.
The comparison between potentially signing Hedo and the signing of Vlade doesn't work imo. Leadership and fostering camaraderie (Hedo hasn't shown anything close to what Vlade did, even with the Hornets before he came to sacto) aside, Vlade's statistical production (double-double big-man), and the fact that he played a position with far fewer talented players than the small forward position of todays NBA, renders the comparison impotent. Now, I agree with the idea that if we can get a "catalyst" piece (a Vlade, Doug Christie) we should look into it, but, other than thinking Hedo is not that guy, the cost would simply be to great. As for the Barry and Mad Max types-- I give Petrie my full permission to use the league minimum exemptions in whatever fashion he sees fit.
The "see how the current players would fit the roles of the former great Kings teams"-- yes I clearly see it, as I am sure the organization does now and will when they inevitably make a push for Hedo. The most important point, however, is that we don't have Webb, the special talent that we can build around that makes it all work. Some might play the crystal-ball card on me (how dare you imply JT isn't the next KG, what are the lottery numbers, blah blah. ..) but I think JT's peers are players like Dale Davis and Joe Smith, good solid big guys but certainly not transcendent talents. If we manage to acquire a Bosh or Amare, maybe Hedo would be worth a second look (l would still probably prefer someone who brought more defense in either case) but the order of acquiring a Hedo before one of the aforementioned names seems exactly backwords.
My final point is that is makes very little sense to invest as heavily in the small forward position as Brick would presumably have us do. Hedo at 7+mil(escalating most likely) Noc at 8mil per(shrinking), Cisco and 6mil per, so that puts us at 21million invested at that position, with not a Lebron or even a Carmello among them? This would effectively strangle us financially. While all these guys would have value to the right teams, this team is not the right place for them at this point. They are "winners" in the sense that they are the kind of guys who flourish next to superstars. Conversley; together, as a platoon of super-role players on a team devoid of said superstar, they would only help assure that this franchise will not have the means of digging itself out of the hole it is now in.
Sorry if I got a bit carried away
