There has been speculation about his health and less speculation (I think) about his contract next year, which could also be a distraction. His personality might be the issue a little and feel someone slightly less talented but more obnoxious would be the more valuable piece right now.
You think somebody less talented but more obnoxious would be a better piece now? Can you elaborate?
At some point, this team does need one or two a-holes. Doesn’t necessarily mean HB needs to go, but we need a couple guys that can provide a little bit of muscle and attitude.Well he has been one of the most talented guys on our team for a few years. But he hasn't ever really impacted winning. And maybe he's just too nice and polite. Think a Jae Crowder, who probably isn't as talented, but actually imposes himself on the game, would be better value.
It was already an opportunity before he went down, but yeah it definitely amplifies that opportunity.Suns just lost Cam Johnson to a torn meniscus. Could be an opportunity there to trade Barnes.
The other alternative is…I'd do that in a a hot minute, no chance the suns do that.
One of the Morris bros would be a good startAt some point, this team does need one or two a-holes. Doesn’t necessarily mean HB needs to go, but we need a couple guys that can provide a little bit of muscle and attitude.
Is a good player who has struggled 8 games into the season.
I wouldn't take that. If it's a lesser player than Barnes I want him to be younger, not older.Giving up a 1st for Barnes is a massive overpay and clear act of desperation, Crowder for Barnes is a fair deal but I doubt Crowder wants to come to a team where a playoff spot is not a lock.
Barnes has the highest defensive rating on the team and is one of the few natural connectors on this team, on both sides of the ball. Though he's not exceptional at it.
Yes, his offense hasn't been up to his career average--a smart GM would bet on him returning to his career average at 30. And bet on the still solid, full sized wing 3/4 defending. Get him for peanuts and watch him thrive in the playoffs.
Yhall's focus is on the wrong side of the curve.
Defensive rating can be misleading. If you look into more advanced defensive stats like def raptor it's not as favorable. He's still not close to the worst defender on the team, but he's not been the best.
Also Barnes has never lead us to any form of success in the 4 years he's been here and is known for disappearing over large stretches of time. We don't owe him a thing in terms of letting him work his way out of this massive slump. If there is a player on the bench who the coaching staff thinks will be more efficient we need to start them, no matter what that does to Barnes value.
I know it doesn't work this way, but Barnes is having a not great, but respectable season if you eliminate the two Warriors games. Those were by far his worst two games, and I suspect that it is a matchup that is bad for him. If you eliminate the two Warriors games he is averaging 12/6/2.5, which is not terrible.
The interesting thing is Barnes' shooting splits. On two point shots he is shooting
Season: 50%- 23/46 (2.55/5.1 per game).
Career- 49% (3.8/7.7 per game)
Kings Career- 52% (3.45/6.65 per game)
So he is right on his normal average. The interesting thing is the volume. 2.5 less shots per game from his career average and 1.5 less shots per game from his Kings average. So he is shooting the same percentage from two, just on less volume.
From three point range, the problem is opposite. He is shooting the same amount of threes as his career average (but less than his Kings average), but making WAY less.
Season-- 5/30- 16% (.55/3.3 per game)
Career- 38% (1.3/3.5 per game)
Kings Career- 39% (1.7/4.3 per game)
If you could get him to his normal level of aggressiveness inside, while increasing his efficiency to a more normal level from outside, you would add an extra two and three per game, and you would be talking about Barnes averaging around 16/6/2.5 (i.e. right around his career averages).
That said, I have no idea why he is less aggressive inside and less accurate outside, but he isn't as far off as the stats would suggest, at least offensively.
Is a good player who has struggled 8 games into the season.
Defensive rating can be misleading. If you look into more advanced defensive stats like def raptor it's not as favorable. He's still not close to the worst defender on the team, but he's not been the best.
Also Barnes has never lead us to any form of success in the 4 years he's been here and is known for disappearing over large stretches of time. We don't owe him a thing in terms of letting him work his way out of this massive slump. If there is a player on the bench who the coaching staff thinks will be more efficient we need to start them, no matter what that does to Barnes value.
If we wait until the deadline it will be too late. Hopefully when the December moratorium arrives also with teams that are trying to compete this year there will be some urgency to see what Barnes and Holmes can bring them and maybe we get a useful piece back. If we don't move on before the deadline we're a lotto team unless they suddenly figure out a way to fit into what Brown is doing.Both Barnes and Holmes are not great fits for this team. Both are fairly puny, which is not what the Kings need. Maybe at the trade deadline we'll see something going down.
Unfortunately this year it's on him when he can't hit spotted up open threes. I thought he'd be a valuable piece this year so perhaps in my case it's too high expectations but I just can't with him right now.Fact is that HB has been a 16 mpg scorer on some of the league's most efficient shooting since he arrived in Sacramento while getting ridiculously few touches, especially given his team-leading minutes every year. I have no idea why he seems so passive waay too often. But, equally, I have no idea why his coaches and teammates don't do more to get him more involved. That latter piece is on THEM, not him.