As good as he played yesterday, and has been playing lately, some decisions were bad. At the end of first quarter, he didn't realize the game clock was winding down, made his move too late, and took a contensted 3 pointer. This has happened with us earlier too.
Then, towards half time, he again took a bad shot, when he should have run out the clock a little. Missed the shot, and then fouled Dorrell around mid court when the Ws were in penalty.
I'm positive that many KF's don't watch the game, and rely almost solely on the box score to fuel their opinions.
If anyone didn't notice Tyreke's repeated blown plays in crunchtime (4th quarter, and the end of quarters) then I really don't know how to make it clear other than get a video of the plays and do a commentary.
Time after time after time last night, Tyreke walked the ball up-court, dribbled away the clock to less than 6 seconds, then made a easy-to-stop move then pulled up and shot a contested jumper that missed. The other times, he did the same thing but threw it to Marcus who hoisted the last-second contested 3 ptr, and another time JT hoisted a contested jumpshot.
That is not the recipe for team success in this league. And very importantly, all of those plays the Kings have all game long and can take anytime they want them. The opposing teams WANT the Kings to run those plays.
Hell, I'm pretty sure I saw a 1-4 flat run after that timeout late in the 4th, and if failed just as spectacularly as when Westphal ran it in crunchtime.
Let me repeat, to be clear - these weren't small little unimportant plays. These were the prepared, called-for and conscious plays that failed spectacularly. These were the potentially game-losing plays, all on Tyreke's (and Smart's) responsibility. If the Kings hadn't have gotten 2 balls to bounce their way at the end of the 4th, they probably would have lost this game because of them (Warriors would have had the ball with 7 seconds left, tie game IIRC).
Let me also be clear - I'm not dismissing Tyreke's statistical contributions or saying he didn't help the team a lot last night. I thought he made a few KEY rebounds, and I don't see anyone trumpeting his RBD statline so far. There'sa reason - the numbers aren't big, but their IMPACT on the game was bigger.
But if anyone is suggesting that he didn't make a lot of mistakes simply isn't watching the game closely.
BTW - here's a statistical observation: if Tyreke simply shoots his career 3 PT % and doesn't make that long contested jumper over Curry (which was not a good shot, but it went in) than he wouldnt've been able to steal the ball for the And-1 - then he would have been 4 for 17 with 15 points.
That's not a good game.
So he got 3 longshots to go in.
That doesn't make me feel warm and fuzzy, since we all know his %'s on long shots.
And if I get $hit for simply pointing out what happened on the floor last night, than I don't know what the point of having eyes is.
I'm not bashing Tyreke, or saying anything against the man, or even expressing an opinion.
Here's a prediction, though - the Kings will not win many games if Tyreke keeps initiating the offense as badly as he did last night. There aren't many games that the Kings can afford to score about 20% of the time in crunchtime possessions and win against most NBA teams.
That 1-4 flat play has to be eradicated from the Kings playbook until Tyreke gets better shots out of it, IMO.