Grades v. Warriors 12/26

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
Peja ( C- ) -- for much of the night a passive effort for Peja. We had no energy, and Peja was right at the top of the list. Just crusied his way to points. Wasn't helping that our guys weren't consistently finding him when he was open. Had a little assertive push late with us in trouble, grabbed a few boards after doing nothing there again for three quarters, tried to force his offense a bit rateh than just floating. Choked a free throw at the 23 second mark to probably finish us, but was just joining the crowd. Bibby, Miller, Webber, Peja in order went 1 for 2 from the line in the last two minutes, and it just killed off our last hope.
Webber ( B ) -- Erratic game for Webb for much of the night. Showed uncommon hustle and hit the floor on a number of occasions. Also made a series of great steals poking the ball away from various players and attacking in the open court. But had trouble stringing together shots, never dominated the glass, and for much of the game his passes were off the mark leading to more turnovers than assists. But earned his stripes down the stretch as he hit big shots and made a series of great passes in the last three minutes to really lead our comeback. Did his best to play the hero and bail us out, but just wasn't getting much help.
Miller ( C+ ) -- High assist numbers this game might almost have been a negative sign rather than the positive one it would normally be, as most of them came because Brad simply refused to look for his own shot. Just very passive offensively and at times he really hurt our offense because of it. Had some early problems with Cliff Robinson on defense, and Troy Murphy just ignored him. Was generally strong on the glass, and really stepped it up on the boards in the last few minutes to hold Golden State to one and out and give us our shot. Missed a late FT to help sink us.
Christie ( C ) -- played a strong first half where he made both offensive contributions, and defensive contributions where he really utterly shut down Jason Richardson. Had a good grade going at that point despite a few more of what are becoming his patented stupid/careless turnovers. But his second half turned into a total disaster -- first of all he really helped drag the Warriors back into the game with another burst of sloppy/careless passes. And then he let Richardson hit one shot. And then another. And then another. And before long our carelessness and lack of energy had opened the door for Richardson to turn unstoppable and beat us. Gets his grade for the good first half.
Bibby ( C- ) -- just an ok game by Bibby. Maybe less than an ok game. Like the rest of the team, had no energy. Had a couple of little bursts here and there, did help on the glass. But overall was pretty flat. Struggled to control the aptly named Speedy Claxton who was able to penetrate at will.
Evans ( B+ ) -- another excellent effort for Mo. A few more of these and maybe we can set aside all of the the "who should we pick up" discussions. Oops --actually forgot to finish this one off -- played solid positional defense, but was unable to slow down Richardson. Points out something -- Mo is solid, but is he a stopper? And can he really be disruptive with his defense the way Christie can/could? Or is he just a good athlete who will get in your face and not screw up?
Songaila ( D ) -- Darius kept on getting the call because of matchups, but did not earn his minutes tonight. Has one brief stretch of play early in the second where he did a good energetic job of battling Troy Murphy on both ends of the floor. But thereafter was just invisible and of no help.

Adelman ( D ) -- well, that just sucked. We played with all of the effort and intensity of the New York Knicks and the results were predictable. Obviously were nto ready to play this one. Rick showed a lack of originality in rotation patterns, settling into a SEVEN man rotation on a night when none of our main guys had any energy and we were desperate for a spark. Why not try Tag? Or Barnes? Just SOMEBODY to give us a spark? Team rallied down the stretch, and if we're going to blame Rick for the collapse against Miami, he deserves some credit for getting them to fight back here. Still perhaps the worst loss of the season if you take into account the opponent (although the late collapses against Minneapolis/Miami are perhaps more troubling for our long term prospects than simply overlooking a bad team).
 
Last edited:
Webber deserved an A for clutch plays down the stretch!

Wow B for Webb huh.. When Mo was gaurding J-Rich was when he caught fire and basically won the game for them. Needs to play better D but some sweet dunks no doubt.
 
Last edited:
Team grade: F You can't turn your play on and off during a game, you can't have turnovers like that and expect to win, and you can't miss free throws. If they haven't learned anything else over the years, I would have bet money they had learned that one. Apparently not...

:(
 
VF21 said:
Team grade: F You can't turn your play on and off during a game, you can't have turnovers like that and expect to win, and you can't miss free throws. If they haven't learned anything else over the years, I would have bet money they had learned that one. Apparently not...

:(
I agree!!! The team gets a F for me too.


No games until New Year's eve... I hope they get tons of practices!!
 
What was Adelman supposed to do? Most of his players were playing with a GAF attitude in the third quarter. The turnovers were really stupid. There were flashes of brilliance amidst extended periods of leaden performance. Leaden, as in plumbum. I would like to see a team shake-up take place. Maybe some reduced minutes for certain starters, and some experimentation with scrubs and lackies.
 
Team grade is spot on. A team that is as good as the Kings are *supposed* to be doesn't give up 17-point and 12-point leads from the third quarter on, especially not to a team like GS. I think a big, big problem for this team this year is the lack of another low-post option other than CWebb when the going gets a little tough and the jumpers stop falling. CWebb's jump hook isn't like Duncan's turnaround jumper off the window --- not nearly as consistent. And if he's having one of those nights where the Kings just can't buy a basket, the other options are all on the perimeter.
 
Oh balderdash. Webber was NOT the problem tonight. Not having a "low post" option was not the problem. The main problems were a lack of effort for extended periods AND an inability to guard Jason Richardson, along with some abysmal free throw shooting and an apparent memory lapse about defense. Our low-post presence or lack thereof didn't give up the double digit leads.
 
ILV said:
I just got home...I guess we lost???

Yep... :(

But don't worry...we have VF21's Earthquake Survival Party to go to so it's all good. :)

P.S. Brick, you are oh so generous with the grades.... I'd give them all an F...well, okay...a D- then...
 
Just got home from the game and had a few hrs to think about things. First of all there was at least ONE bright light and his name is now Maurice the Beast. I love what Evans is doing and hope he keeps it up! I am optimistic that Evans has a good understanding of what an opertunity he has and what to with it.

Now the team grade... Not sure I can gaive tham an F but not sure they earned anything better. The woule team looked flat untill Evans hit the floor. This is the first time all season that the Kings apeared to take a team for granted. Against the Heat and Lakers they looked sharper, but got beat when they let their gaurd down. This time the team never seemed to wake up untill too late. I expect Adelman will be chewing out the team and they need it. The past few losses have been bad but tonights was inexcusale and was the worst of the batch.
 
VF21 said:
Oh balderdash. Webber was NOT the problem tonight. Not having a "low post" option was not the problem. The main problems were a lack of effort for extended periods AND an inability to guard Jason Richardson, along with some abysmal free throw shooting and an apparent memory lapse about defense. Our low-post presence or lack thereof didn't give up the double digit leads.
I didn't say CWebb was the problem. I said that having him as the only low post option was the problem. And, I think there's a case to be made to correspond to Adelman's thoughts that when the Kings have trouble offensively, they start settling to quickly for the first open shot, losing their offensive rhythm, and allowing the other team to whittle away leads or completely erasing them.

Contrary to your last statement, I think the Kings lack of a low post presence other than CWebb helps other teams make comebacks on the Kings. If they had another low post option beside CWebb (I'm thinking of Vlade two years ago, or Corliss Williamson for the Pistons last year, etc.), they would have the ability to more easily slow things down on the offensive end.
 
4cwebb said:
I didn't say CWebb was the problem. I said that having him as the only low post option was the problem. And, I think there's a case to be made to correspond to Adelman's thoughts that when the Kings have trouble offensively, they start settling to quickly for the first open shot, losing their offensive rhythm, and allowing the other team to whittle away leads or completely erasing them.

Contrary to your last statement, I think the Kings lack of a low post presence other than CWebb helps other teams make comebacks on the Kings. If they had another low post option beside CWebb (I'm thinking of Vlade two years ago, or Corliss Williamson for the Pistons last year, etc.), they would have the ability to more easily slow things down on the offensive end.
Did you watch the game??????
 
I believe that great D should not be preserved for the playoffs alone, but should be a way of life on the court. Here's a question I have had since forever. Why can't Bibby put up a hand in front of a shooter? Okay, "poor defense" rant over now.

Like others have said, we needed Tag in there to clog, cause the Warriors were doing a Waltz in the lane last night.

It's easy to be short-sighted and worry when we lose to a way inferior team on our home court, who wouldn't? The way things go on this ballclub -- we're up, we're down, we're up again -- has to be the most frustrating aspect of these losses. We have lost many leads to both good teams and a few to inferior and the issue is poor defense nearly every time. We just can't lay back and allow menial teams (or ANY team, for that matter) to CONSTANTLY waltz into the paint, uncontested, and throw it down. Foul or something. That's why we have Tag!

I don't think Adelman deserves a grade above passing for this. Doug should have been pulled after his 4th or 5th turnover and insert Barnes. How long is Barnes gonna "pay" for his sloppy and/or menial play as of late? Adelman needs to send a message to the starters that THEIR shoddy/menial play will not be tolerated, whether it is poor D or sloppy passing. Or sloppy shooting. Why is this lesson only for the bench? We need our bench!

Truly lost in all of this "sloppy play" analysis is the surprising superior play from Evans. We may just be looking at history if this player stays on track. :eek:

P.S. Did anyone else catch Jerry Reynolds' comment last night? He said "[Adelman] is the best coach in the league at developing bench when injury occurs". Very telling statement, since developing the bench almost always happens just at that injury-to-a-starter stage, not before. Humph!!!

Rant really over now.
 
Last edited:
Can anyone tell me why the crowd booed Derek Fisher so enthusiastically? I know he was a Laker, but I think he always conducted himself well with the Lakers. There must be some event that I don't remember. I can understand booing Najera. He is a little like Madsen, an accident waiting to happen. We don't need any more injuries.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top