[Grades] Grades v. Thunder 12/14/2012

Where's OKC have the greatest talent advanatge over us?

  • #1 Gun: Cousins v. Durant

    Votes: 12 26.1%
  • #2 Gun: Reke v. Westbrook

    Votes: 2 4.3%
  • 6th man: Thornton v. KMart

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other starters: JT/Salmons/Brooks v. Perkins/Ibaka/Thabo

    Votes: 9 19.6%
  • Rest of the Benches

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Coach: Brooks v. Smart

    Votes: 23 50.0%

  • Total voters
    46
  • Poll closed .

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
K, for most of the game the bright spot was Tyreke slipping right back into his rhythm -- the longer this goes on, the more chance there is that its a permanent condition, and then your big boggle will be simply how much do you offer for a 50% shooting 20ppg defensive minded SG?

Then of course the IT supernova flared and made the normal bright or dim spots irrelevant. Actually it should be noted IT's defense was pathetic and I'm not going to give him a "+" to his A because of it. But he got as silly hot as any King in recent memory, poured in 23 points in the 4th quarter, and singlehandedly had us in position to steal it.

All of which means no Girls, which is just as well, as a whole bunch of kids out this way got killed today by some gun toting nut, right in my backyard -- I used to work with a partner who's kids went to that very school. I have an ex girlfirend with a 3 yr old daughter (with her husband) who lives less than 10 miles down the road. Its possible in a few years her girl would have gone there. So...not in a festive theme mood. Grades will come as usual though.

Don't normally post the kingsflix highlights for losses, but since I am not doing a theme:

Boxscore

Stats: 28min 3pts (1-7, 1-4, 0-0) 2reb 3ast 0stl 0blk 1TO
Salmons ( D+ ) --- you know, from before this game even began you knew John could not guard Durant. No hope. We saw that last year, and gee is it any shocker when your blown up (and not even really that blown up) SG can't guard the other team's PF height SF. And it was there from the very first shot of the game, with Durant calmly splashing one in over our smallballer. There in the final boxscore too as Durant dropped a cool 31pts...on 10-14 shooting. The only sweat he worked up on the night was while watching the dance team's moves during the breaks. So John fired back with...3pts. On 1-7 shooting. For a few minutes early in the game he disguised his impotence by greasing what offense we had early with willing passing. He set JT up for his first two hoops, and doing the roleplayer thing. Unfortunately the roleplayer thing also includes hitting open threes when you get set up for them, and John only hit one shot on the night (indeed a three, in the early third to cut the lead to 10). On any reasonable team that would jump out as a major weak link. On ours, he fit right in and might have been the strongest SF to take the field -- the other two, Cisco and Johnson, combined to shoot 1-8 for 2pts. So Them: 10-14 31pts. Us: 2-15 5pts. Hmm.

Stats: 29min 15pts (6-7, 0-0, 3-4) 6reb 4ast 1stl 1blk 2TO
Thompson ( B ) -- all of our early points on little garbageman gimmes from Salmons, and carried that role through all game lng without ever losing the efficiency. Knocked down one jumper and some FTs in the earyy third as we made our (non-IT) move, but for the most part was just putting on a clinic of making himself available near the hoop. Grabbing some rebounds would have been a nice complement, as we got crunched again, but picked up a few in his later minutes. Never did have any control over Serge Ibaka, who knows a thing or two about doing the roleplayer/present yourself for open shots thing himself. Course, that gets easier when JT is leaving you entirely open half the time. Like the other starters, lost all his late minutes because IT was completely carrying our bench and making them look good. Still would have liked to have seen the guy with 15pts on 6-7 shooting get back into the game for the stretch minutes and see if we could actually have stolen this one.

Stats: 28min 10pts (3-12, 0-0, 4-4) 7reb 2ast 1stl 1blk 2TO
Cousins ( C ) -- after having his first jumper blocked by Perkins, which wasn't a terribly promising start, settled in and had himself a very solid/strong/in control first quarter. This was one of those learning games for Boogie, where you saw him alter his style of play based on past problems. In this case the problem, if you may remmeber, is that Serge Ibaka likes to block every single groundbound flip Boogie puts up inside. So as it was vs. guys like Hibbert, Boogie shifted his game outside toward the long jumpers. And after the opening miscue, that worked pretty well for him aginst Perkins, who would just assume not be out that far. If that was all he had done though, it would just have been a passive finesse center sort of game. Fortunately however we got to see flashes of a lot of his stuff out there. Had a nice interior pass through traffic to set TRob up for his only hoop. Picked up a long rebound at full gallop and raced down the floor for the layup. Amazing one handed snatch on a too high pass from Reke on the break led to more points. Didn't get into foul trouble -- in fact in a development that underscores our desperate need to require a shotblocker in there, on multiple occasions in this game visibly pulled back rather than challenge things around the rim in order to avoid any chance at a foul. Hey, if that's what he has to do to stay on the floor then...ok I guess. Its like he was playing with 5 fouls from the beginning. But it leaves you without even the pretense of a defensive anchor in there, which means you NEED to go get another one to handle the duties. Was played well into the 2nd quarter as Smart tries something new rotationwise, and in a welcome development left Reke and Cuz out there to try to stabilize the bench. Of course it did not work, and they were left out so long that fatigue probably hit, but at least it beats the 12 minutes of 5 scrubs out there togetehr crap we've had to watch all year in 2nd quarters. When Boogie returned, never regained his former level or comfort zone. He immediately forced a fallaay jumper with no hope that was just a bad shot. Started the 3rd with a sdie jumper which was short, and then was largely frozen out/forgotten about in the third, and I think as that often does with Boogie, that sort of damaged his rhythm and calm and he ended up forcing up a togfh tough poor shot in the late 3rd, leading to his being replaced by Hayes. Givne that Chuck Hayes scored 0pts and grabbed 1reb in 20min of action while using his awesome suhtdown defense on such scoring studs as Kendrick Perkins and Hasheem Thabeet, I still would have liked ot have seen Boogie back in that game for the final 3-4 minutes to try to help IT close this thing out. Grade better than numbers this time, as if you watched the game you could feel the control and maturity and strength of the game early, whatever the numbers said.

Stats: 35min 21pts (8-12, 0-1, 5-7) 4reb 2ast 3stl 0blk 2TO
Evans ( A- ) -- slow start to this one as he was maybe our least involved starter in the early going, and yet came on stronger on stronger until he was easily the best player on the court not named Durant. Made a great one armed offensive rebound in the early going, but the ofense did not really get going until the Thunder put Kevin Martin on him, and all of a suddent he Jordan tongue came for Reke as he just physically overpowered Kevin to the hoop for the +1 the same as he has done in the past -- Kevin just can't guard him, and Reke knows it and seems to relish it. I'm nto sure how much confidecne Reke had in the jumepr this time as he seemed to be avoiding situations where he's have to sue it, once passed on an open three to dribble in a few steps and miss a tougher one etc., but ketp coming up with real nifty moves to the hoop, and impressively took on all comers. Embarrassed Westbrook with a lightning spin move. Began to look very confident almost toying with Thabo Sefalosha as the game went along, and Thabo is a pretty damn good defender. Had a real nice drive in the early 3rd, and then a a steal up top and breakaway to cut the lead down to 12. Played some splashed of excellent defense on Westbrook as well as he was up on his toes -- the nnoyance there is that he did not get a chance to play more of it, as we didn't keep him consistently in that matchup nad our little points were, as usual, infeffective defensively. In his final minutes came up with a beautful spin drive to the kickout to Salmons for a three, but John missed it. And a nifty flash play on the break with the faked behind the back pass leading to the +1 finish -- looked like something out of those summer tournament youtube videos. Played long minutes, but when it mattered the coach choked again, inexplicably sticking with Jimmer for the stretch run rather thann bringing back the guy with a spectacular 21pts on 8-12 shooting. Regardless of coaching, he was clearly right back into that great rhythm we've seen him in for a long time now. Get this: despite the early season struggles, Reke is now shooting the highest percentages of his career from the field, 3pt land, and the line. He's shot .520 in the last month of action. Excepting a 3 game in 4 night struggle from Nov 2- Nov 4 where he shot 9-38, he is shooting .508 from the field on the season. And somewhat unnoticed, Reke closed last season shooting .498 in March and .500 in April.

Stats: 23min 13pts (4-8, 2-4, 5-7) 2reb 1ast 0stl 0blk 3TO
Brooks ( C ) -- he weebles, he wobbles, but somehow he gets just enough done that our starting unit remains functional. Forced a dumb jumper off his dribble from the corner to start, and Westbrook was having his way with him early. But forces or not, Brooks started to get some points back the other way and by the end of the first quarter was one of two guys along with Cousins who had us right in this thing. Never did show any contorl of the team hwoever, which is almost a nightly comment in his grades. Always on the border of being out of control, and kept on overpenetrating late in the half. Added yet another technical complaining after he was stripped on a drive -- with our starters we've gto two stoic stoenfaces in Reke and Salmons, and then three bitter beer face complainers. Bright spot in the early third, when he drained back to back threes off of good ball movement. But as the quarter wore on, slowly slipped toward selfishness again, and of all the starters, he was the one who it would have been justified to keep out late, given that his replacement scored 26 pts in 16 minutes of course.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bench

Stats: 19min 6pts (1-2, 0-0, 4-4) 3reb 1ast 0stl 2blk 1TO
Robinson ( C ) -- got an early call with JT in quick foul trouble, and while it did not show up much in the stats, was modestly effective when in there wiht the starters. Got his first and only hoop moving to the hoop and taking a nice pass from Cousins for the tough finish inside through traffic. But the best he could do for a followup was a dumb jumper outside the offense off his own dribble. I perhaps detect the presence of Smart and his universal green light, but he does better when he keeps it simple. Highlights of the night were two flying help blocks, and that remains a positive sign for a guy who rarely seems to use his athelticism to be a defensive factor. Lost his battles with Collison, in fact not blocking out or chasing defensive rebounds while Collison ran right around him repeatedly, and turning the ball over trying to post him the other way. Still got the stretch run minutes instead of JT, because IT was hot. And if that statement didn't quite make sense to you, that was intentional.

Stats: 14min 5pts (0-4, 0-1, 5-5) 1reb 2ast 1stl 0blk 2TO
Fredette ( D ) -- in the first half was quiet, but not completely obliterated defensively aside from just inexplicably turning his head and having Maynor blast by him, breaking down the entire defense in the process. Game and grade defined by his disastrous late play however. Was out there for almost the entire IT explosion, and for a long while was deferrign to IT, and even set him up for one or two of his shots with easy little passes. But then something happened, perhaps an aneryism or other brain malady, because with about 3 minutes to go and IT having singlehandedy (and I do mean singlehandedly -- IT nearly doubled up the scoring of the entire rest of the bench) made a sudden game of it and forced Durant back into the game....Jimmer suddenly got confused. Apparently in his mind he suddenly came to the conclusion that HE was the guy who had done all that, because he just started playing selfish and stupid ball, overdribbling looking for his shot, chucking up long bricks, and if he had not gotten a bailout foul call on one of his threes which sent him to the line for 3 FTs, coming up completely empty while suddenly taking 4 of our 5 shots over a two minute span. I'm sure the Thunder thanked him after the game.

Stats: 13min 2pts (1-6, 0-2, 0-0) 0reb 1ast 2stl 0blk 0TO
Garcia ( F ) -- back to the bench and right on queue turned right back into a pumpkin. And something else we've seen before too -- when Cisco tried to guard Kevin, Kevin immediately scored over him. All those practice battles has always made Kevin comfrotable as can be when we've tried to use Cisco on him over the years. Just hit nothign, as he shot as bad as Salmons minus the intangibles. Missed a corner three in the late third we needed, got swatted by Thabeet on an easy layup attempt, and played himself entirely to the bench by the end of things.

Stats: 20min 0pts (0-2, 0-0, 0-0) 1reb 0ast 2stl 0blk 0TO
Hayes ( D- ) -- continuing his mystery fade and just got almost nothing at all accomplished out there...and yet still somehow was deemed the better late game option than Cuz or JT. Guess he must have been setting some pretty awesome screens for IT. Or maybe it was the single rebound he grabbed to go with his zero points. Forced a couple of dumb shot attempts for no reason, triggering a Thunder break wiht one of them. And jsut flat got reboudned over the whole night. After several strong weeks to start the season, we're now down to a big who plays 20min and gives you 0pts 1reb. Hell, I could probably do that.

Stats: 15min 2pts (0-2, 0-0, 2-2) 2reb 2ast 0stl 1blk 1TO
Johnson ( C ) -- just 1 on 1 stuff to the hoop, but in the end may have been our best SF, which is not a compliment to the other guys. Nice spin mpve buit missed the tough follow with us down 13 and needing it in the mid 4th. Good decision to find IT for his 21st point, adn made several more unselfish pass attemtps, some of them even on target. Was thinking fomr the start of the game that Durant is precisely the sort oof guy we got Johnson in the hopes of stopping, but he's jsut been so bad offensively that we couldn't match him there to start. When he did play Durant, bit of a mixed bag. Early in the game for some reason drifted off of KD and left him in the corner for the one three. How do you think that worked out? But late in the game was strong on him defensiely except for falling for the Durant arm swinging "foul" gambit (really on the refs as much as Durant for being cheap). Nothing great here, but was not upset he was on the floor at leat. Progress!

Thomas ( A ) -- I always do the becnh in the order in which they come int he game, but I was temtped to set that rule aside for the night because IT pretty WAS the bench, WAS the comeback, and WAS the guy who made a game out of a non-game late for us. And he didn't do it wiht hustle, or passing (certianly not), or defense, where all my early notes here are filled up with "making mistake after mistake guarding Sefalosha" "kept on losing Maynor" or "IT guarding Kevin = disaster". But none of that stuff reall mattered in the end as he toom mighty mite gunnign to new heights, getting absolutely torrid hot against the OKC bench, and then trying to keep on scoring against their returning starters, when he could wrestle the ball back from Jimmer. He, and I do mean he, not "we" had the lead down to 13 by the mid 4th. Then it was 10. then 8. Then 5 after Jimmer got fouled shooting a three pointer...but it was all IT. He poured in 23 points in the final quarter, but we only scored 35, and only outscored OKC by 4 by the end of it. Still, he (npt we) put a little bit of a scare into them, got them to emergency reinsert their big guns. And if our coach had just made the call to reinsert Reke , and Cuz, and JT, to surround the red hot little guy...who knows?






placeholder....
 
Last edited:
could you imigine what our team might look like if we had Sam Presti as a GM, and Scott Brooks as our coach.

tonight displayed polar opposites when it comes to bulding small market teams

and polar opposites when i comes to coaching
 
Very nice game by IT. Made it a fun game. Love his competitiveness. I'm hoping he can get a lot more minutes. I'd like him to take all of Brooks minutes.

Cousins looked very good in this game. Extremely good. No ref issues either. Yipee.

Tyreke looks very good on offense when he dribbles a maximum of three times. Then his game is simple, efficient, and highly effective. He looks very bad when he doesn't abide by the three dribble rule. Then his game is dramatic, elaborate, and highly ineffective.

Robinson continues to tantalize. Hopefully, he'll go beyond that as the season progresses.

Johnson looks lost out there on offense.

Thompson played well.
 
could you imigine what our team might look like if we had Sam Presti as a GM, and Scott Brooks as our coach.

tonight displayed polar opposites when it comes to bulding small market teams

and polar opposites when i comes to coaching
If you are trying to say "we lost", I already knew that. If we do better we might come closer to winning. Meantime we are Sacramento.
 
Very nice game by IT. Made it a fun game. Love his competitiveness. I'm hoping he can get a lot more minutes. I'd like him to take all of Brooks minutes.

can't. dominates the ball and plays for himself. Makes him oil and water with Reke. He could be a bench sparkplug though if the coach would just let him take that role and quit farting around with musical chairs everybody gets a chance crap.

Cousins looked very good in this game. Extremely good. No ref issues either. Yipee.

I agree he looked better than his numbers. Solid out there and calm. But still did not get much done after the first quarter and 10pts 7rebs on 3-12 shooting isn't what you are hoping for. Of course wasn't given a chance late.

Tyreke looks very good on offense when he dribbles a maximum of three times. Then his game is simple, efficient, and highly effective. He looks very bad when he doesn't abide by the three dribble rule. Then his game is dramatic, elaborate, and highly ineffective.

you remain insane on this issue.

Robinson continues to tantalize. Hopefully, he'll go beyond that as the season progresses.

I'm glad (very glad) to see the blocks, but am growing increasingly restive with the people, largely but not entirely who were TRob fans before the season started, trying to do the same thing Jimmer fans were last year. TRob has shown no NBA level offensive game, and he's not even rebounding. He's too small to handle anybody with real size inside. He's a very good athlete, but damn, so are a lot of NBA guys. Has a lot to figure out/overcome just to get up to solid roleplayer level. As with Jimmer last year I find myself holding off on stronger statements almost entirely on a hype/rep I never particularly believed in in the first place. What he really, desperately, needs, is that midrange ffaceup jumepr that all small PFs need. Brandon Bass, Kenyon Martin, Big Baby. If you're giving up size, you need to be able to knock that down. Oh, and take it in rhythm as part of the offense, not off your own dribble.


Johnson looks lost out there on offense.

Thompson played well.

No quibbles on either of those. :)
 
Last edited:
Cousins first quarter was the best this year hes played, but as soon as he got mad at how garbage the team was playing he pretty much quit and just throw up shots he really didn't even have much intention of going in. Didn't go in for a single offensive board or post up after and yeah pretty much gave up. The more and more I look at it, it might be the best thing for Cousins to go a winning enviroment for his sake, the more we lose in this embarrasing manner the more likely hes going to self destruct. We got to much D-Leauge level talent and thats the reailty of the situation but at least they are all nice guys I guess.
 
Even early on in the year when our offense was having major problems producing points and we were high in the league on defensive catagories (not that our defense was causing it all) we didn't have a problem with our starters being beat horribly. Our starting 5 have played most of the games at or better then the opponents starters. This is why we get all over smart for his platoon subbing and why we talk about losing games in the second quarter. We have the ability to play fairly even with the best in the nba when our starters are in. Or at least close enough to give ourselves a chance to win.

It was nice to see a bit more sanity on the starters minutes through the half today and while I would have gone with different players in the second unit having some starters on the floor with them should help eventually. Hopefully we see it get better in that respect from here. Isn't that the conditioning that he was talking about all last year? Get Cousins and Reke in shape to the point that they can be on the floor for more of the game.
 
could you imigine what our team might look like if we had Sam Presti as a GM, and Scott Brooks as our coach.

tonight displayed polar opposites when it comes to bulding small market teams

and polar opposites when i comes to coaching

we "had" scotty. we ended up letting him go for theuss i believe lmao. a awesome magoof hire
 
we "had" scotty. we ended up letting him go for theuss i believe lmao. a awesome magoof hire

Twas, although I cannot point the finger on that one too much as I was icked out by my impression that Brooks had undermined Muss in order ot get the job, and didn't have naything on his resume to suggest he was ready. :)

That said, no bleeping way was I hiring Reggie Theus based on his couple of years of college coaching and stellar acting career.
 
Thanks for skipping a theme tonight, Brick. I had a hard time thinking of a basketball game as having much importance after the tragedy in CT. Life will go on, but it sure has knocked me out for a bit.
 
Twas, although I cannot point the finger on that one too much as I was icked out by my impression that Brooks had undermined Muss in order ot get the job, and didn't have naything on his resume to suggest he was ready. :)

That said, no bleeping way was I hiring Reggie Theus based on his couple of years of college coaching and stellar acting career.

I tried to tell you that Scotty Brooks was the favorite of the guys in the know, the guys who had been watching him work his posterior off with the players way above and beyond the call. :p

As for Theus, you forgot about his dashing attire and dazzling smile. (Oh, and the fact that I actually owned a Theus jersey from back in the day.)
 
I cannot believe Smart did not sub Reke and Cuz back in in the 4th. IT had the best quarter of his career in the 4th, hitting everything he put up, but around the 3-4 min mark OKC took the momentum back, or rather stopped ours. At that point, and that's the latest I would have done it (3 min mark) you have to put Reke and Cuz back in. Without a doubt. At the least you put Reke in who again was having a damn good game on both sides of the ball. There's no good reason to hold those two out, but then you consider it was Jimmer of all people keeping Reke on the bench in Smart's eyes, while going 0-4?

Our 2nd quarter was once again extremely poor and that's once again where the game really was blown open. Why doesn't Smart split up Reke and Cuz more. He road them both until about the 7min mark of the 2nd(far too long into the game) then didn't bring them back until late, and we were blown off the floor during that time. He should have cycled them in and out much earlier. This isn't that f'ing complicated. Cuz out at 4min mark, back at 11 min mark. Reke out after 1st, back in at 7 min. 38 min pace for both. 2min total without one on floor.

We also lost this game due to Smart not putting Reke on Westbrook from the start. Westbrook was uncomfortable when Reke played him for stretches but pretty much got where he wanted to on the floor and created numerous passing lanes against anyone else. Yet Smart didn't recognize Reke on Westbrook was working. Instead had Brooks struggling on him and then IT getting worked by him most of the 4th. If Reke is on Westbrook and IT is still going off, it might have been a different game.

I'm getting pretty tired of the player mismanagement. Instead of seeing what's working and adding to it, Smart consistently negates a positive contribution by forcing a negative one. Jimmer instead of Reke? Chuck instead of Cuz? IT going off so you negate that by not having Reke on Westbrook and have IT/Jimmer get lit up by him and Kev instead? Our bench against Westbrook/Durant/Martin/Ibaka down the stretch, when they're playing poorly aside from IT? Are you kidding me? IT's breakout performance softens the blow of what was a terribly coached game.
 
Last edited:
Any person looking at results of poll here would have to conclude something is terribly wrong with the "head" of the head coach of the Kings. Every day it just looks more and more like either deranged incompetence or worse bizarre conspiracy by the maniacal Maloof's.
 
I'm getting pretty tired of the player mismanagement. Instead of seeing what's working and adding to it, Smart consistently negates a positive contribution by forcing a negative one. Jimmer instead of Reke? Chuck instead of Cuz? IT going off so you negate that by not having Reke on Westbrook and have IT/Jimmer get lit up by him and Kev instead? Our bench against Westbrook/Durant/Martin/Ibaka down the stretch, when they're playing poorly aside from IT? Are you kidding me? IT's breakout performance softens the blow of what was a terribly coached game.

I think Smart is so stuck with the coaching "philosophy" that units are the best way of going that mixing starters with a hot bench player never entered his mind. He has done this since taking over the coaching job last year. Starters would play and the five bench guys would sub as a unit. I know this is an obvious trait of his style but I mention it to explain why Reke and Cuz did not return. I thought it was a phase he was going through but this game nails it down that my idea may be the truth. Amazingly stupid.
 
Last edited:
I think Smart is so stuck with the coaching "philosophy" that units are the best way of going that mixing starters with a hot bench player never entered his mind. He has done this since taking over the coaching job last year. Starters would play and the five bench guys would sub as a unit. I know this is an obvious trait of his style but I mention it to explain why Reke and Cuz did not return. I thought it was a phase he was going through but this game nails it down that my idea may be the truth. Amazingly stupid.

In my honest opinion, I think coach Smart is trying too hard to be some sort of revolutionary game-changing coach. He's figured out his own way of doing things, focusing extremely heavily on stats and seeing where a player is efficient and things like that. That in itself is a very good thing, but where he goes wrong is not using that information to his advantage. For example, instead of then drawing up plays to get guys shots where they are effective he simply tells them not to shoot outside of those areas. And then the whole bit with the rotations and using differnet lineups depending on the matchups and what not ... The funny thing is, like some have pointed out, he talks so much about taking advantage of matchups but time and time again doesn't use Evans to contain the Westbrooks/Lillards etc. for large stretches.

Perhaps my biggest beef with Smart however, is that he doesn't adapt his style to fit our personnel. He wants to force them into a running game instead of drawing up better half court sets for guys like Jimmer/Thornton to get easier open shots. Charles Barkley and the rest of the TNT crew criticize D'Antoni for not changing his style to suit the Lakers' roster, and conversely Pop has been praised for adapting to make use of Parker and his younger players as Duncan and Ginobili got older. Smart needs to learn to adapt
 
It's pretty awesome when Serge Ibaka is a more reliable shooter than anyone on our entire team. I'd love a player or two that can actually hit shots on a semi consistent basis.
 
It's pretty awesome when Serge Ibaka is a more reliable shooter than anyone on our entire team. I'd love a player or two that can actually hit shots on a semi consistent basis.

Hes actually one of the better mid range shooters in the NBA period Serge, imo the Kings needs to start putting Cousins if hes not in foul trouble on the better PF/C scorer JT pretty much every single game this year has been abused and has significantly less impact than the oppositions PF/C hes guarding. Bill Walton even said Cousins should be guarding the other teams best big man like he did vs Alridge in the Blazer game for a while.
 
People still finding a way to be negative about IT's performance?

Dear oh dear, he got us back in the game on his own. Sadly, Coach Smart not putting Reke/Cuz back in the game when it became a 2 possession game was the death knell.

Ok, even with Reke and Cuz out there we probably wouldn't have won with Durants Bull**** swing through garbage, which i thought they were going to "stop calling," guess not.
 
Team grades are more important to me. But how to grade a team whose starting guards dish only 3 assists in 58 min of playing time and whose bench (except for IT this time) shoot a combined 3 for 16? The Kings assist/TO ratio is worst in league. Coaching and players share in those issues along with rebounding problems. Last year they were top 5 in rebounding! What happened?

There's gotta be a pony in there somewhere!?
 
Last edited:
we "had" scotty. we ended up letting him go for theuss i believe lmao. a awesome magoof hire

Imagine for a moment you are Brooks. I bet during last nights game he thanked God multiple times for not being selected to coach the Kings. Things have worked out pretty well for the Kid from Lathrop, CA. It does not hurt that he has a couple of Top Ten talents on his squad.

KB
 
can't. dominates the ball and plays for himself. Makes him oil and water with Reke. He could be a bench sparkplug though if the coach would just let him take that role and quit farting around with musical chairs everybody gets a chance crap.



I agree he looked better than his numbers. Solid out there and calm. But still did not get much done after the first quarter and 10pts 7rebs on 3-12 shooting isn't what you are hoping for. Of course wasn't given a chance late.



you remain insane on this issue.



I'm glad (very glad) to see the blocks, but am growing increasingly restive with the people, largely but not entirely who were TRob fans before the season started, trying to do the same thing Jimmer fans were last year. TRob has shown no NBA level offensive game, and he's not even rebounding. He's too small to handle anybody with real size inside. He's a very good athlete, but damn, so are a lot of NBA guys. Has a lot to figure out/overcome just to get up to solid roleplayer level. As with Jimmer last year I find myself holding off on stronger statements almost entirely on a hype/rep I never particularly believed in in the first place. What he really, desperately, needs, is that midrange ffaceup jumepr that all small PFs need. Brandon Bass, Kenyon Martin, Big Baby. If you're giving up size, you need to be able to knock that down. Oh, and take it in rhythm as part of the offense, not off your own dribble.




No quibbles on either of those. :)


I don't buy the whole "IT is a gunner who can't pass" storyline. Doesn't pass muster (no pun intended). Last year he was very good in assist/to's when he started. He can do the same thing this year if put into the starting lineup with guys that stretch the floor. He's still just in his 5th quarter of NBA basketball and people want to cement his career. Heck, people talk about Nash and how long it took him. What about Parker and how long it took him? Chauncy Billups? And there are many others. The point is not that IT will be as good as those guys, but that that it is near-sighted at this point to limit IT in how good he can be. Last night the team needed somebody to score, and that's what he did. Let's celebrate how good his performance was rather than lament what we perceive to be his inherent weakness at this point in his young career.

I don't think Robinson is very far away from having a mid-range game. He shot mid-range shots pretty good at Kansas, he has good form from what I can see. It's like I said before the draft - he's a project. I didn't expect him to do much in his first year, so I'm not dissapointed overall. I am mystified by him cruising one moment, and then being a disruptive force in the other moment. All I can come up with is that he's thinking a lot out there instead of playing, but he probably has coaches telling him all kinds of things he needs to do out there - like slow down offensively - so he's probably somewhat confused right now. It's way to early to worry about Robinson.
 
Twas, although I cannot point the finger on that one too much as I was icked out by my impression that Brooks had undermined Muss in order ot get the job, and didn't have naything on his resume to suggest he was ready. :)

That said, no bleeping way was I hiring Reggie Theus based on his couple of years of college coaching and stellar acting career.

we didn't hire one coach w/ no experience only to hire another w/ no experience :) only in the land of kings
 
Imagine for a moment you are Brooks. I bet during last nights game he thanked God multiple times for not being selected to coach the Kings. Things have worked out pretty well for the Kid from Lathrop, CA. It does not hurt that he has a couple of Top Ten talents on his squad.

KB

agreed.
 
Back
Top