Grades v. Raptors 03/16

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
3339.jpg

Ron Artest ( B+ ) : 36min 19pts (8-15 FG, 1-4 3pt, 2-2 FT) 10rebs 5ast 4stl 0blk 2TO
Had himself kind of a quiet big first quarter, finishing with something like 7pts 5rebs 3stls but not really overshadowing the game. And really for the entire game mostly stayed out of the way this time, never really overdominating the ball, but also never really dominating action. With the lack of size and strength on the Raptors frontline, Ron was able to repeatedly wade into the offensive glass battles and either get the ball or cause the Raptors to fumble it (including on the play that kind of sealed it in the final 30 seconds after Kevin missed a FT but Ron muscled in there to knock it out off a Raptor). Followed that by muscling his way in for a layup to put us up 6. Defense was strong as usual, althoguh he did get best a couple of times down the stretch. Funny thing here -- rock solid numbers, and Ron staying out of the way sounds like a great thing on paper. And yet his game lacked spark, as did we in barely nudging a team missing its star and spiraling (2-8 since Bosh went down).

3308.jpg

Mikki Moore ( A- ) -- 33min 17pts (7-8 FG, 0-0 3pt, 3-3 FT) 7rebs 0ast 0stl 0blk 2TO
Operated easily in there without Bosh and racked up efficient numbers around the hoop. And evidence would seem to suggest that Mikki was actually maybe the guy the Raptors were having the hardest time matching up agianst. Beno eventually cooled, Ron was on court while we blew various leads. But the only thing stopping Mikki in the first half was spending minutes on the bench. Less effective in the second half, and part of that may have been the unfortunate foul trouble for the uber-soft and just terrible Andrea Bargnani. Super-scrub Kris Humphries began to get more minutes and had some effect muscling Mikki's stick figure physique around the paint. I will freely admit btw that this game does not deserve this many good grades -- it was a drab struggle for us against a bad team. But individually a number of our guys were solid or more by their own standards, so I'll just leave this note and move on.

3305.jpg

Brad Miller ( B- ) -- 42min 14pts (6-12 FG, 0-1 3pt, 1-2 FT) 11reb 1ast 0stl 1blk 3TO
Nothing again in the early going, because, you now, he was matched against the mighty Rasho Nesterovic, so what could you expect? Forced to play more miutes than it looked like he wanted to with Spencer going down with a foot strain. Again showed more life in the third, and maybe he's just like that old engine that takes time to warm up on a cold day. Started draining jumpshots late in the game, which partially made up for getting worked over by Rasho Nesterovic on the other end. No, wait, it didn't. There are people on this board that could hold Rasho to single digits. Brad let him go for a season high 20 in Brad's return to his make-a-scrub-look-like-a-superhero ways. Another "solid number" guy, but Iw as not amused by either the lack of intensity early, or the lack of defense all game. Even his points were just passive little jumpshots. His game of course. But nothing to dispel the appearance of the intensity not being there again.

3843.jpg

Kevin Martin ( A- ) -- 43min 32pts (9-21 FG, 2-3 3pt, 12-15 FT) 8reb 4ast 1stl 0blk 5TO
Aggressive looking for his shot early, but only on and off as far as actually making them. Was clearly forcing the action, and really did not get much going until after half when, after an inefficient sloppy game (5-13 4 TOs), he was largely responsible for the reappearance of our 3rd quyarter lead with a series of three point plays -- an "and 1" and then two threes. After the burst, he was largely quiet again, shipping in here and there but mayeb only having 4 or 5 more points until the final 30 seconds when he considerably padded the scoring stats as the Raptors had to foul repeatedly to extend the game. Kevin actually missed a couple of them to keep the door slightly ajar, but still took a 26 point night and turned it into 32. In fact given the early struggle, turnovers, and poor shooting (9-21) this would have been a B+ if it was just scoring. But this time out he also helped on the glass, and even made some nice passes to set guys up (Ron and Brad in particular). So up to an A- despite the rough edges to this one.
 
Last edited:
3845.jpg

Beno Udrih ( B- ) -- 38min 15pts (6-15 FG, 1-3 3pt, 2-3 FT) 1rebs 7ast 0stl 1blk 6TO
Some sloppy turnovers in the early going whenever he tried to pass, but was aggressively scoring to make up for it. Just quit shooting after the hot start though -- started the game hitting his first 4 or 5 shots, finished 6-15. Had another turnover late as well with the game stilll in the balance. Racked up enough assists to keep this in the Bs I think (also helps that the much hyped Jose Calderon was not good either), but a 7-6 Ast/TO ratio isn't what you are looking for out of your PG.

4288.jpg

Spenser Hawes ( INC ) -- 4min 0pts (0-0 FG, 0-0 3pt, 0-0 FT) 1rebs 0ast 0stl 0blk 0TO
Did little in a few first half minutes before leaving the game with a "foot strian". Arch problem? Anyway, have to hope it does not linger, as this final month is supposed to be about developing players, not playing our veterans 40+min (see Reggie grade below).

3949.jpg

Francisco Garcia ( C- ) -- 25min 5pts (2-6 FG, 0-2 3pt, 1-1FT) 3reb 0ast 0stl 2blk 2TO
Came up with a three point play at the very end of the second quarter that was the only thing standing between us and pissing away our entire first half lead in the final 6 minutes of the half. Put us back up 4. And that was really it for Cisco highlight. Entirely apart formt eh three point shooting, is it just me or is this just a different player from the one we were watching in January? Would think he would be one of the last guys to pack it in, but that same energy is just not there. Had a couple of nice blocks, otherwise a lot of largely empty minutes, and watched Kapono drop a ton of points in his face in the second quarter too.

4147.jpg

Quincy Douby ( INC ) -- 7min 0pts (0-3 FG, 0-1 3pt, 0-0FT) 2reb 1ast 0stl 0blk 1TO
I think we may need a new award for Piksi's pregames -- the QDWTSTM-NOT award, for "Quincy Douby Way To Seize the Moment -- NOT" award. Missed his shots. Did not do enough of anything else to make up for it, and with Reggie's idea of developing youth being giving them a token stint and then letting them work on their towel waving skills that was that.
 
Last edited:
4133.jpg

Shelden Williams ( B- ) -- 6min 0pts (0-1 FG, 0-0 3pt, 0-0 FT) 6reb 0ast 0stl 0blk 0TO
Would have thought that Spenser's injury might have opened up minutes for Sheldon, but seconds is more like it. As in a grand total of 6 seconds in the first half. Did finally get some exctended run at the end of the third and then into the 4th. Challenged some people defensively and got on the glass against the woefully soft Raptors frontline, but also had problems scoring inside with the stubby factor. Then taken back out as Reggie still cares more aboout "winning" than developing anybody.

3207.jpg

Anthony Johnson ( B ) -- 6min 4pts (2-2 FG, 0-0 3pt, 0-0FT) 1reb 2ast 0stl 0blk 1TO
Hit a corner shot, and you assumed that would be that -- he had his stat for the night, and would quickly follow with a blizzard of nothingness. But then he hit ANOTHER shot, and it was like, woohoo, party! And THEN he threw in not 1, but TWO assists, and...wow. Just wow. It was as if a faith healer had just cured my male pattern baldness. I was positively in raptures. Fortunately made it over the grading threshhold so I could reward the magnificence. Thought about the A+++ but settled for the B.

reggie_theus.jpg

Reggie Theus ( DORK ) --
Reggie grade=dork. One of the ways you can get labeled a dork is by just trying way too hard to please. And so I have concluded that Reggie, amongst other things, is a dork. Another night of our sub-.500 starting 5 drably chalking up huge minutes while anybody who still ahs any development to do in his game rots on the bench. But man, we squeaked out the victory over the terrible (Boshless) team. Woot. And here is where the dork comes in -- Reggie thinks that those 8 people who were actually in Arco tonight really want to see this. Of course I suppose when you are Reggie, played in the league 13 years as his generation's Shareef, and saw .500 in only 2 of the 13 seasons, that must look like a really sexy goal.
 
Last edited:
Kevin with 32 pts, 8 rebs, 4 asts, and 1 steal. He gets an A.
Ron gets an A with 19 pts 10 rebs 5 asts and 4 stls.
Brad was back with 14 pts 11 rebs. Give him a B+.
Beno had 15 pts and 7 asts, but his career high 6 TO's brings him down to a B.
 
Last edited:
Reggie thinks that those 8 people who were actually in Arco tonight really want to see this. Of course I suppose when you are Reggie, played in the league 13 years as his generation's Shareef, and saw .500 in only 2 of the 13 seasons, that must look like a really sexy goal.

Personally, I think ending the season above .500 is more valuable than you think. Let's face it, tanking the rest of the season (also known as "developing young players") isn't really going to improve our lottery position anyway. And I don't think "developing" players while they lose every game by 30 is too beneficial either. There's nothing like pounding it into players' minds that "Hey, if we play you a lot of minutes ... this team sucks beyond belief". However, if this team with all of the injuries this year, can be above .500 in the Western Conference, I think you enter the off-season with something positive. If the players on this team come into next year thinking that with a healthy team, they can improve on that .500, and the Western conference returns to the realm of normalcy where above .500 gives you some type of shot at the playoffs, then it's definitely worth it.
 
Wrong, playing time for young guys is always important and beneficial any time.

Reggie won't play them how most would like until Petrie strips him of those veterans.
 
its been impossible to evaluate anyone this year as far as young guys go besides hawes(somewhat), martin and garcia .. when players get 10 or less minutes they rush EVERYTHING cause they feel they need to make an impact or sit, which is sadly true .. douby rushes everything, shelden shoots everytime he gets the ball because he never gets it .. ( same with hawes ) WE NEED TO FIND OUT WHAT WE HAVE .. reggie wants to win .. ok .. well the decision is his , he can win a few now and have the maloofs fire him in a year or two because of how mediocre we will be or play the young guys, lose a few more and rebuild thus keeping his job and possibly having a good future in sac.
 
Kevin with 32 pts, 8 rebs, 4 asts, and 1 steal. He gets an A.
Ron gets an A with 19 pts 10 rebs 5 asts and 4 stls.
Brad was back with 14 pts 11 rebs. Give him a B+.
Beno had 15 pts and 7 asts, but his career high 6 TO's brings him down to a B.

Any game with 6 TO's deserves at best a B-, unless he had a triple double, or at least double that in assists
 
Personally, I think ending the season above .500 is more valuable than you think. Let's face it, tanking the rest of the season (also known as "developing young players") isn't really going to improve our lottery position anyway. And I don't think "developing" players while they lose every game by 30 is too beneficial either. There's nothing like pounding it into players' minds that "Hey, if we play you a lot of minutes ... this team sucks beyond belief". However, if this team with all of the injuries this year, can be above .500 in the Western Conference, I think you enter the off-season with something positive. If the players on this team come into next year thinking that with a healthy team, they can improve on that .500, and the Western conference returns to the realm of normalcy where above .500 gives you some type of shot at the playoffs, then it's definitely worth it.

uh... yeah, thats what we tried to do last season. did we improve on last season tremendously? not really, same crap, different toilet. play the damn kids already! why even draft them if you aren't going to play them. totally ridiculous. lets just skip the draft and go into next season to improve on our .500 record.
 
Personally, I think ending the season above .500 is more valuable than you think. Let's face it, tanking the rest of the season (also known as "developing young players") isn't really going to improve our lottery position anyway. And I don't think "developing" players while they lose every game by 30 is too beneficial either. There's nothing like pounding it into players' minds that "Hey, if we play you a lot of minutes ... this team sucks beyond belief". However, if this team with all of the injuries this year, can be above .500 in the Western Conference, I think you enter the off-season with something positive. If the players on this team come into next year thinking that with a healthy team, they can improve on that .500, and the Western conference returns to the realm of normalcy where above .500 gives you some type of shot at the playoffs, then it's definitely worth it.

I disagree completely. Young players don't get to play a lot on average-great teams because they have no experience at the NBA level, or are not NBA ready. The only way they can get experience is if you PLAY them in real situations (not just garbage time). The goal for the rest of the season should be to develop our young guys, especially Hawes and Shelden. We've had front court problems ever since Webber left, and even still had them when Webb was here (defensively)
 
It's been said before (sorta), but when K-Mart scores 32 pts, grabs 8 boards, and dishes out 4 assists, and only gets an A- (saw the game and I agree with the grade), you know he's turned out to be a pretty damn good player.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top