Grades v. Raptors 01/29

Status
Not open for further replies.
bozzwell said:
It would be interesting to do a proper analysis of our peak years in terms of defense. Even then, how much of it was really team defense and how much was individual ability (Doug on perimter and Webb and Vlade inside) and the fact that we were pushing tempo, blowing teams up and generally destroying opposition on one end - both physically and mentally.

Well one of the things I keep on saying is that good defensive players = good team defense. Give Pop our guys and the Spurs are NOT a top defensive team (although he could get some mileage out of Ron). Give us the Spurs lineup, and all of a sudden we are. Defensive minded personnel play responsibly on that end, make the rotations out of instinct, have the height and athleticism to do something after the rotation is made. And you get enough of them together they can sense each other like a pack of wolves and inherently trust one another knowing that the other guys share their mentality.

Give Ron time, and I think our defense will get better even with no more changes, just because he is a leader and others will feel compelled to step it up. But we'll never be good defensively until we get him some more defensive minded running mates, and in particular some sort of interior defender to anchor things.
 
kennadog said:
Here's some of 02-03's stats....

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=tmcompare&season=2003&seasontype=2

#1 in FG % against
#1 in 3PFG % against
#1 in defensive RBs (not good at all in OFF RBs, tho, so slightly out-rebounded overall)
#2 in point differential
#2 in steals
#4 in Assists to TO ratio
#11 in OPP TOs
#12 in TO differential
#12 in blocks (and didn’t get blocked much on OFF)
Partial Roster: Webber (pre-knee collapse), Divac, Stojakovich; Christie; Bibby; B Jackson; Pollard; Clark; Turkoglu; Wallace; J Jackson

Our main defensive weapon was our depth. We were able to keep the rythm hige and the opponent was on his heals all the time. Just look at that depth - sick
 
piksi said:
Our main defensive weapon was our depth. We were able to keep the rythm hige and the opponent was on his heals all the time. Just look at that depth - sick
Yep. It was great depth and very expensive depth.
 
Bricklayer said:
Well one of the things I keep on saying is that good defensive players = good team defense. Give Pop our guys and the Spurs are NOT a top defensive team (although he could get some mileage out of Ron). Give us the Spurs lineup, and all of a sudden we are. Defensive minded personnel play responsibly on that end, make the rotations out of instinct, have the height and athleticism to do something after the rotation is made. And you get enough of them together they can sense each other like a pack of wolves and inherently trust one another knowing that the other guys share their mentality.

Give Ron time, and I think our defense will get better even with no more changes, just because he is a leader and others will feel compelled to step it up. But we'll never be good defensively until we get him some more defensive minded running mates, and in particular some sort of interior defender to anchor things.

That is good enough for me. Just a glance at our roster then and now, supports your theory. Same as Detroit, their players were either always great defenders (Wallaces, Billups) or freaks of nature like Prince. And then it all rubbed off on Hamilton.

It will get ugly before it gets good for us though. At least around here. Ron's defensive intensity is making just about everyone else on the team look like they are not even trying. They were defending in spots (Brad blocked a key shot, KT's steal in crunch) but we should never allow Raptors to score 124 points on us in one game.
 
Bricklayer said:
3 years actually.

We went from a top defensive team at our peak in 01-03 to a weak one the last 2 1/2 seasons.

Opp FG%/Opp Pts
98-99 .446 100.6
99-00 .452 102.0
00-01 .432 95.9
01-02 .440 97.0
02-03 .420 95.2
03-04 .454 97.8
04-05 .459 101.6
05-06 .460 100.3

No coinsicdence that when we were good defensively we were a title contender. And now...

You should use pts/possession (and eFG%, but there's no archive of that). And also bring offensive pts/possession for relative performance. That allows for better comparison.

98-99 99.9 -100.0 (-0.1)
99-00 101.9- 99.9 (+2.0)
00-01 103.3- 97.7 (+5.6)
01-02 106.8- 99.2 (+7.6)
02-03 103.4- 97.1 (+6.3)
03-04 107.7-102.9 (+4.8)
04-05 107.5-105.2 (+2.3)
05-06 106.6-108.3 (-1.7)

This more accurately shows that this and last season have been the worst (by far) as far as defense concerned. 00-01 and 02-03 seem the best as far as defense concerned.

Point differential is by far the worst this year as well, and that is reflected by our W/L record (point differential is predictor for the W/L record. Should this go on, a .450 record is predicted, or 37-45).

The point differential, when plotted, shows a parabolic curve; in other words, an ascend into a clear peak (01/02), from there on a descend again.
 
Last edited:
what a pathetic road trip. we played some really bad teams and still managed to BARELY win one game. very pee poor efforts! i'm very unhappy with this team right now.

tonight's loss, yah it was a heartbreaker, but ****, weren't we up 6 with hardly any time left?? and they managed to choke it away. it's breakdowns lke that that pee me off!

i'm in a hissy mood tonight, so some of this is venting.

just get it together kings, and do it fast!
 
It's clearly been a very rough week for the team, so I'm going to let this slide and expect them to bring it come Tuesday. Not saying it's an excuse for the loss though.
 
A Skinner appearance would be nice. I would like to see him and Artest out there when we are looking for some stops. I don't understand how come Rick is so attached to Miller that Skinner can't get off the bench when we are looking for some stops.
 
Bricklayer said:
3 years actually.

We went from a top defensive team at our peak in 01-03 to a weak one the last 2 1/2 seasons.

Opp FG%/Opp Pts
98-99 .446 100.6
99-00 .452 102.0
00-01 .432 95.9
01-02 .440 97.0
02-03 .420 95.2
03-04 .454 97.8
04-05 .459 101.6
05-06 .460 100.3

No coinsicdence that when we were good defensively we were a title contender. And now...
WOW 43% oppenent shooting and 95 points and the Sacramento Kings WOW!
 
Bibby - B
Hot as usual but please stop shooting, Kings don't need a PG with 32 FGA and 3 ast. You have good teamates you know.
Artest - B+
Need to cut some one on one, other than that great game
KT - B-
Usual good O bad D game, TO is killing. someone please buy him a coffee before game.
KMart - A-
Great game but forcing too much in the 2nd half, if he can play under control we may not need Wells.
Miller - c+
Can finish around the basket to save his life on O, can't guard anyone either. Reason getting c+ are reb and passing. Kings need a new trainer to improve his vertical from 4" to 6".
Garcia - B
0 OT alone is worth a B, like Kmart need to play under control.
Reef - B-
Good D overall, in position to rebound, but ball don't bound his way and Kmart steal at least a couple from him. Need to improve D rotation and make yourself visible to your team mate when they drive in. There is a few time you can get easy lay up if Bibby/Artest can see you under the basket.

AR - do you have anything else other than Bibby/Miller pick and roll?
 
Bricklayer said:
Well one of the things I keep on saying is that good defensive players = good team defense. Give Pop our guys and the Spurs are NOT a top defensive team (although he could get some mileage out of Ron). Give us the Spurs lineup, and all of a sudden we are. Defensive minded personnel play responsibly on that end, make the rotations out of instinct, have the height and athleticism to do something after the rotation is made. And you get enough of them together they can sense each other like a pack of wolves and inherently trust one another knowing that the other guys share their mentality.

Give Ron time, and I think our defense will get better even with no more changes, just because he is a leader and others will feel compelled to step it up. But we'll never be good defensively until we get him some more defensive minded running mates, and in particular some sort of interior defender to anchor things.

I agree with your last statement. I think Ron can bring some defense out of his teammates. Defense, once again, also comes down to buying into it, confidence, and chemistry. None of our guys trust eachother of defense. They have to learn to trust one another, and give the EFFORT on defense to gain that trust.

I do agree however that we need some sort of beef in the paint. I watched Etan Thomas play the other night and I just wish we could get a guy like that. We had one last year in Ostertag. We all know the story to that one, but the fact is, the game changed when he was on the court. Nobody was coming into the lane uncontested. He at least made them work for those layups!
 
According to Mark Stevens as said on CP Thurs or Friday, part of getting Artest to Sac was the Maloofs agreed they'd make more moves to get better
 
Kings113 said:
According to Mark Stevens as said on CP Thurs or Friday, part of getting Artest to Sac was the Maloofs agreed they'd make more moves to get better

Well, I don't remember hearing about making moves specifically, but I do remember hearing that Artest wanted to make sure they weren't packing it in for the season. Whether that involves trades or not, I don't know. Did you hear those exact words? I have noticed Geoff Petrie is watching these last couple of games, maybe planning for something? We'll see I guess.
 
ESP47 said:
Woulda been nice to run that KMart alley oop on that last play.

I was thinking the same thing....

Or Artest rolling around a screen to the hoop and just deflecting it in off the glass at the rim if Martin was covered well (because they know he's a dunker).
 
Folsom Al said:
... my point was this: they came back after being down by 11 points in the 4th quarter by playing with ALOT of energy and intensity .... where the heck was that energy and intensity the REST OF THE GAME ??? :mad:

Then they had a 6 point lead in OT with 2 plus minutes left and threw it away !!! :mad:

TO's - is what hurt the King's tonite .... they out-played Toronto in every other facet of the game.

Mistakes - errors - oops .... can't score if you don't have the ball

I wouldn't say it was just turnovers......it was the STUPID LAZY TURNOVERS!!! Bouncing the ball off your foot, etc.....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top