HndsmCelt
Hall of Famer
41 would have done itPixelPusher said:Maybe he should have gone for the full 81 points.![]()

41 would have done itPixelPusher said:Maybe he should have gone for the full 81 points.![]()
VF21 said:![]()
VF21 runs off to find a dictionary to determine the meaning of the strange term...
![]()
bozzwell said:It would be interesting to do a proper analysis of our peak years in terms of defense. Even then, how much of it was really team defense and how much was individual ability (Doug on perimter and Webb and Vlade inside) and the fact that we were pushing tempo, blowing teams up and generally destroying opposition on one end - both physically and mentally.
kennadog said:Here's some of 02-03's stats....
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=tmcompare&season=2003&seasontype=2
#1 in FG % against
#1 in 3PFG % against
#1 in defensive RBs (not good at all in OFF RBs, tho, so slightly out-rebounded overall)
#2 in point differential
#2 in steals
#4 in Assists to TO ratio
#11 in OPP TOs
#12 in TO differential
#12 in blocks (and didn’t get blocked much on OFF)
Partial Roster: Webber (pre-knee collapse), Divac, Stojakovich; Christie; Bibby; B Jackson; Pollard; Clark; Turkoglu; Wallace; J Jackson
Yep. It was great depth and very expensive depth.piksi said:Our main defensive weapon was our depth. We were able to keep the rythm hige and the opponent was on his heals all the time. Just look at that depth - sick
Bricklayer said:Well one of the things I keep on saying is that good defensive players = good team defense. Give Pop our guys and the Spurs are NOT a top defensive team (although he could get some mileage out of Ron). Give us the Spurs lineup, and all of a sudden we are. Defensive minded personnel play responsibly on that end, make the rotations out of instinct, have the height and athleticism to do something after the rotation is made. And you get enough of them together they can sense each other like a pack of wolves and inherently trust one another knowing that the other guys share their mentality.
Give Ron time, and I think our defense will get better even with no more changes, just because he is a leader and others will feel compelled to step it up. But we'll never be good defensively until we get him some more defensive minded running mates, and in particular some sort of interior defender to anchor things.
Bricklayer said:3 years actually.
We went from a top defensive team at our peak in 01-03 to a weak one the last 2 1/2 seasons.
Opp FG%/Opp Pts
98-99 .446 100.6
99-00 .452 102.0
00-01 .432 95.9
01-02 .440 97.0
02-03 .420 95.2
03-04 .454 97.8
04-05 .459 101.6
05-06 .460 100.3
No coinsicdence that when we were good defensively we were a title contender. And now...
kennadog said:Yep. It was great depth and very expensive depth.
piksi said:You are wasting Your time - there is no such phrase
WOW 43% oppenent shooting and 95 points and the Sacramento Kings WOW!Bricklayer said:3 years actually.
We went from a top defensive team at our peak in 01-03 to a weak one the last 2 1/2 seasons.
Opp FG%/Opp Pts
98-99 .446 100.6
99-00 .452 102.0
00-01 .432 95.9
01-02 .440 97.0
02-03 .420 95.2
03-04 .454 97.8
04-05 .459 101.6
05-06 .460 100.3
No coinsicdence that when we were good defensively we were a title contender. And now...
Bricklayer said:Well one of the things I keep on saying is that good defensive players = good team defense. Give Pop our guys and the Spurs are NOT a top defensive team (although he could get some mileage out of Ron). Give us the Spurs lineup, and all of a sudden we are. Defensive minded personnel play responsibly on that end, make the rotations out of instinct, have the height and athleticism to do something after the rotation is made. And you get enough of them together they can sense each other like a pack of wolves and inherently trust one another knowing that the other guys share their mentality.
Give Ron time, and I think our defense will get better even with no more changes, just because he is a leader and others will feel compelled to step it up. But we'll never be good defensively until we get him some more defensive minded running mates, and in particular some sort of interior defender to anchor things.
Kings113 said:According to Mark Stevens as said on CP Thurs or Friday, part of getting Artest to Sac was the Maloofs agreed they'd make more moves to get better
ESP47 said:Woulda been nice to run that KMart alley oop on that last play.
Folsom Al said:... my point was this: they came back after being down by 11 points in the 4th quarter by playing with ALOT of energy and intensity .... where the heck was that energy and intensity the REST OF THE GAME ???![]()
Then they had a 6 point lead in OT with 2 plus minutes left and threw it away !!!![]()
TO's - is what hurt the King's tonite .... they out-played Toronto in every other facet of the game.
Mistakes - errors - oops .... can't score if you don't have the ball