These exercises by the NBA to try to legitimize their blatant biases and inconsistency never fail to pee me off.
They appear to break things down and confirm on-court rulings, but they still contain the oversights and biases and incorrect determinations of the original calls.
(BTW - notice how almost none of the calls have any replays or other angles shown?)
Zaza quite clearly fouls Boogie on the drive at the end of regulation-
His arm plows into Cousins' upper body and arm during the shooting motion. It has nothing to do with his body position. There is no body position which allows a defender to reach across and through a shooter. He very clearly is not in a straight, vertical body position. This is a foul most of the time if it's on a star guard making the same play. But the NBA for some weird reason doesn;t protect big men during shots the way it does guards. Wonder why?
And as Chubbs mentions, what's the point of releasing something that says Nowitzki's forearm shove to Collison's throat to clear space is actually a legal play?
Everyone knows that's complete BS.
They have eyes, and can see the illegal move, regardless of what the NBA is making up to justify their ref's accuracy.
Again, at :12 left in OT, if that's a clean strip by Zaza on Cuz, then the NBA had better take away all the fouls it calls on guards who get fouls when anyone even breathes on their arms.
And seriously, if Cousins is fouling DWill's body as he shoots at 4:08 of 2OT, then stick a fork in the NBA cause everyone would foul out in the 1st qtr. Cuz fouled him when he reached by, not with his fingers barely brushing along his back as he drove to the basket, and that's what the call (and pdf mention) was for.
The pdf reads like a copy-paste of "Pachulia (DAL) maintains legal guarding position and cleanly strips the ball from Cousins (SAC)."
Seriously, how is it possible for Zaza's hands to be perfectly psychic, and cleanly strip Cuz so many times back-to-back-to-back?
They actually bothered to state that Anderson and Dirk didn;t foul each other on the rebound attempt, but didn;t mention that Dirk should have been T'd up at LEAST once for his excessive arguing and gesticulating right in the refs face.
Similarly, the pdf never mentions Carlisle being on the frigging court, even during the last play - the ref even declines to call the whistle, and during the play has to take his eyes off the action to physically push/motion Carlisle off the floor!
The pdf never mentions or refers to replays which show whether DWill hit Collison on either of his air-balls in the last 35 seconds of the game.
In reality, the NBA is impossible to referee because the amount of physical contact in every play can be called a foul - it just matters what the result or the reaction is that determines whether many fouls are called. It is inherently inconsistent.
For example, every single battle in the paint for position can be called a foul, if the other person flops on contact. (See Nowitzki vs Cousins at :56 remaining in OT - if either player had flopped the opposite direction of the pushes, it would have "forced" a foul call)
The NBA is always going to have this problem as long as they call fouls based on reaction, instead of actual contact or rules compliance.