Carmichael Dave @CarmichaelDave
Can report there is concern internally over the style and effectiveness of George Karl. Very important 48 hours. Nothing off the table.
Again, how is any of this a surprise?
Carmichael Dave @CarmichaelDave
Can report there is concern internally over the style and effectiveness of George Karl. Very important 48 hours. Nothing off the table.
Again, how is any of this a surprise?
Explain the losing of credibility part. Just curious.Carmichael Dave loses more credibility every time he speaks. No I am not surprised. Even if there were dissatisfaction within the ranks, now is not the time to voice it or give it credence. This may be the most difficult stretch of games ANY team has had in recent memory to start a season. It's almost like the schedule maker decided to see if he could stack the deck against the Kings at the beginning of the season to see if the pressure cooker would explode. But the schedule will even out over 82. Let this thing have time to fully cook. We are looking in the oven wondering why the souffle has not risen, just itching to open the door and dump the pan.
Carmichael Dave @CarmichaelDave
Can report there is concern internally over the style and effectiveness of George Karl. Very important 48 hours. Nothing off the table.
SMH, here we go again...
Whether you like him or not, firing Karl now would surely send us back to the lottery. What is the deal with our pick next year. Someone remind me in what scenario do the Sixers get our pick?
Team USA does not equal NBA season. If players in Chicago clashed w him u can bet cuz will. Remember cuz likes to be versatile not just play down low.
Maybe Vlade made all the roster changes with another coach in mind or more accurately, what would be best to surround Cousins and Gay with. Karl doesn't fit that style. Does Thibs fit this style? I'm going to say yes as he and Malone seem like a close fit......defense first, tough nosed coach who is not afraid to get into players.....but then again, this is all speculation.I am disappoint in myself for not making a post yesterday that I had been thinking about just how many losses it would take for Karl to get in trouble. 1-7 seemed kind of a low-end preseason prediction for our start, I thought that would not exceed downward expectations enough to do it. But what if we were to lose to Detroit? Or get sideways then as a team and drop another one. Does 1-10 do it? National media may be right about Vivek in some ways -- he canned Malone at 11-13 after he was winning with Cuz. 1-11? You had to figure we were approaching the sorts of numbers that would start causing alarm bells for a front office/owner who really do want to win for that new arena.
It really shouldn't be this hard btw. We spend a tremendous amount of time on here wringing our hands about golly gosh, how can we reach the Eden of mediocrity. It should not be this hard.
I still have a hard time imagining Karl is in trouble, or wants to be in trouble, so quick. This was the guy who wanted back in the game so badly last year. Unless losing the power struggle this summer just took his heart out of things. But I'm not seeing the old focused feisty Karl at all. he seems disengaged, and a like he's running an experiment or something where the wins or losses resulting are really not so important as being cutting edge, or something. Its odd.
There are indeed some excellent coaches sitting at home right now with NorCal/this roster ties. Thibodeua, Scott Brooks...you are talking former COYs who have been to the Confernce Finals/Finals in the past 5 years. Thibs knows Cuz/Rudy, has coached Rondo/Belinelli, he'd walk right in and half the roster would be "his guys". Brooks is a NorCal native, features stars, likes frontcourts of defensive big men. But obviously such a mess to do that AGAIN unless we've already been in contact with those guys all along. And its really hard to mesh Vivek's philosophy, or Vlade's statements about preferred playstyle with those coaches. I'm absolutely up for it, but so hard to see.
Anyone else see during the Spurs telecast, during a 2nd half timeout, in the team huddle, it looked like Rondo was diagramming a play. Not the coaches but Rondo. I know he's a high IQ guy but that is a little odd.
Maybe Vlade made all the roster changes with another coach in mind or more accurately, what would be best to surround Cousins and Gay with. Karl doesn't fit that style. Does Thibs fit this style? I'm going to say yes as he and Malone seem like a close fit......defense first, tough nosed coach who is not afraid to get into players.....but then again, this is all speculation.
They aren't going to fire Karl. If they do they would be even more of a laughingstock than they already are. It would be a dumb move by Vlade to do so. Around the league his name would be linked to the dysfunction of the Kings organization, an organization that is now synonymous with dysfunction. Instead of being looked upon as the guy who is turning a new page and establishing a new culture, he'd be identified with the old lousy dysfunction.
Normally I would agree with you but Vlade doesn't strike me as someone who really cares much about what the media thinks. If he flames out here it's going to be a while before he gets anywhere near this high of a level in an NBA front office. Simply put, George Karl is not working and probably will never work unless he pulls a Pop and changes his system to fit the player's strengths. Karl is the last of the Mullin/PDA stink so the national media may pile some more if they do fire him but in reality Vlade didn't ask for the coaching mess, he just inherited it. Let the national media hate us all they want, I just care about finally winning some games again!They aren't going to fire Karl. If they do they would be even more of a laughingstock than they already are. It would be a dumb move by Vlade to do so. Around the league his name would be linked to the dysfunction of the Kings organization, an organization that is now synonymous with dysfunction. Instead of being looked upon as the guy who is turning a new page and establishing a new culture, he'd be identified with the old lousy dysfunction.
I know this is not the point of your post, but we are totally gonna get creamed by Detroit. Unless the Kings team from the Clippers games shows up.I am disappoint in myself for not making a post yesterday that I had been thinking about just how many losses it would take for Karl to get in trouble. 1-7 seemed kind of a low-end preseason prediction for our start, I thought that would not exceed downward expectations enough to do it. But what if we were to lose to Detroit? Or get sideways then as a team and drop another one. Does 1-10 do it? National media may be right about Vivek in some ways -- he canned Malone at 11-13 after he was winning with Cuz. 1-11? You had to figure we were approaching the sorts of numbers that would start causing alarm bells for a front office/owner who really do want to win for that new arena.
It really shouldn't be this hard btw. We spend a tremendous amount of time on here wringing our hands about golly gosh, how can we reach the Eden of mediocrity. It should not be this hard.
I still have a hard time imagining Karl is in trouble, or wants to be in trouble, so quick. This was the guy who wanted back in the game so badly last year. Unless losing the power struggle this summer just took his heart out of things. But I'm not seeing the old focused feisty Karl at all. he seems disengaged, and a like he's running an experiment or something where the wins or losses resulting are really not so important as being cutting edge, or something. Its odd.
There are indeed some excellent coaches sitting at home right now with NorCal/this roster ties. Thibodeua, Scott Brooks...you are talking former COYs who have been to the Confernce Finals/Finals in the past 5 years. Thibs knows Cuz/Rudy, has coached Rondo/Belinelli, he'd walk right in and half the roster would be "his guys". Brooks is a NorCal native, features stars, likes frontcourts of defensive big men. But obviously such a mess to do that AGAIN unless we've already been in contact with those guys all along. And its really hard to mesh Vivek's philosophy, or Vlade's statements about preferred playstyle with those coaches. I'm absolutely up for it, but so hard to see.
They aren't going to fire Karl. If they do they would be even more of a laughingstock than they already are. It would be a dumb move by Vlade to do so. Around the league his name would be linked to the dysfunction of the Kings organization, an organization that is now synonymous with dysfunction. Instead of being looked upon as the guy who is turning a new page and establishing a new culture, he'd be identified with the old lousy dysfunction.
Unless we bring on an established coach like Thibs, and start winning. Then the move will be seen as gutsy.
Given how many new players we have, injuries, and the difficulty of our early schedule, I think it's a bit early to fire Karl.
Buuuuuut..... the red flags are all there. He's misusing our two best players. His style doesn't fit the roster. His rotations are awful. He's clearly disengaged.
We probably can him around the all-star break if we don't improve.
Normally I would agree with you but Vlade doesn't strike me as someone who really cares much about what the media thinks. If he flames out here it's going to be a while before he gets anywhere near this high of a level in an NBA front office. Simply put, George Karl is not working and probably will never work unless he pulls a Pop and changes his system to fit the player's strengths. Karl is the last of the Mullin/PDA stink so the national media may pile some more if they do fire him but in reality Vlade didn't ask for the coaching mess, he just inherited it. Let the national media hate us all they want, I just care about finally winning some games again!
Who's we? Vlade's never fired a coach. Coaching candidates would be aware of the new FO and new regime. You appear to think candidates couldn't separate PDA/Mullin and Vlade. Karl simply isn't Vlade's guy, never was. A candidate would understand that, that he'd be the first coach Vlade is actually picking.So what happens if we do fire Karl and bring in a Thibs or Brooks (very unlikely, considering how we treat coaches) and nothing changes? Do you fire them as well? When is the onus finally put on the players to start performing?
No it doesn't. DC or no DC has little impact on the system/philosophy the players and fans alike are questioning. It's not like if you have a healthy DC, everything else is fixed. That's foolish.This tweet by Deuce sums up the situation perfectly:
Deuce Mason @DeuceMason 55m55 minutes ago
Karl has coached 38 games with the Kings. Collison has missed 32 of those games, Cousins-15 of those games and Rudy-10 of those games.
That same HOF coach has pissed off our best player by trying to get him traded, continues to play players out of their natural positions, and has caused a mutiny between the players and coaching staff. It's like trying to build a foundation on top of quicksand. I admit that I was one of the strong advocates for George Karl when he got hired, but I was dead wrong. There comes a point where even HOF-level coaches lose the ability to connect with players and to make in game adjustments needed to win. It's unfortunate but I really think the cancer situation took all of the energy out of Karl, he is not the same coach that he was with the Sonics or even the Nuggets.Vlade better care what the media thinks. He may have been viewed as the new knight in shiny armor when he came in here and made some good personnel moves, but he's going to look like bedraggled Don Quixote on a nag if he fires his HOFer coach, the guy he said he has such respect for. How is that going to affect his ability to bring FAs to this market? Players will take a pass on Sacramento. It's time to buckle up, suck it up, and to make it work with what we've got.