twslam07
All-Star
Just added them in for you.What are the minute ranges on all these? Awesome work, that's the only thing missing
Just added them in for you.What are the minute ranges on all these? Awesome work, that's the only thing missing
You can never predict injuries. Maybe could say Boogie was more prone because of his size, but it's likely he would have adapted with how the league shifted and lost weight like most of the beefy bois have in the last 5 years.
What we can analyze is what actually happened. And he bungled that trade every which way possible.
Not saying you're wrong, but Fox is currently averaging the following (per 36 min) from 12/1-1/9:This is good work. Unfortunately other teams see this also. The time to trade Fox would have been after summer league when you felt confident about Mitchell. Otherwise, if you are unwilling to do so, you should have traded down from the spot and picked up some additional picks.
This.Not saying you're wrong, but Fox is currently averaging the following (per 36 min) from 12/1-1/9:
.564 TS% / .486 FG% / .217 3PT% / .779 FT% / 24.3 PPG / 4.0 RPG / 5.0 APG / 1.4 SPG / 0.4 BPG / 2.4 TOPG
If he continues to put this type of stat line up for another month (trade deadline is 2/10), we may have a suitor or two willing to pay up for him.
I've said it in another thread, but we'd likely be in a better position to trade Fox in the offseason when cap space is more flexible, roster spots are open, and the lottery has been set. With Fox improving his play as of late and Fox & Haliburton posting stellar stats while on the floor with each other from 12/1-1/9, I wouldn't be opposed to giving those two the rest of the season to see if we have a potent young backcourt going forward (let the sample size build across the different guard combinations) or, at the very least, to boost Fox's trade value up again (hopefully).
No, in the end he really didn't. Buddy is still playing, Cuz is riding the pine on 10 days ATM. Facts. That matters considering the alternative was maxing the guy out.
And also, his value was obviously not what some would think it would be when he was traded. He's healthy right now. Can still produce. And teams don't want him for more than 10 days at a time. Speaks volumes. Vlade would like his apologies now. lol.
dude, come on. You can't be this disingenuous defending your boy. Boogie now is not the Boogie from 5 years/2 major injuries ago. I shouldn't even need to type that. The trade was horrible.
dude, come on. You can't be this disingenuous defending your boy. Boogie now is not the Boogie from 5 years/2 major injuries ago. I shouldn't even need to type that. The trade was horrible.
Just for the record, "The Sacramento Kings have agreed to trade DeMarcus Cousins and Omri Casspi to the New Orleans Pelicans in exchange for Tyreke Evans, 2016 first-round draft pick Buddy Hield, Langston Galloway and first- and second-round draft picks this summer"
Boogie was unanimously one of, if not THE best C in the league at the time, to give credit where credit is due.
But I digress... not jumping into this again haha
to be fair to Vlade, Vivek would let me trade earlier when a better deal was possible. I think we can all agree Vivek is the root cause of 3/4’s of the Kings problems.
You're telling on yourself, Vlade![]()
Here is how the On/Off stats shake out for our different PG combinations:
Fox & Haliburton On the Court / Mitchell Off the Court = -3.1 Net Rtg (112.2 Off Rtg & 115.3 Def Rtg over 699 minutes)
Fox & Mitchell On the Court / Haliburton Off the Court = -11.7 Net Rtg (106.3 Off Rtg & 118.0 Def Rtg over 340 minutes)
Haliburton & Mitchell On the Court / Fox Off the Court = +0.9 Net Rtg (103.0 Off Rtg & 102.1 Def Rtg over 350 minutes)
I think we can all admit that Fox had a pretty slow start to the season and starting to get back to normal at the beginning of December. Below is the same on/off stats as I posted above except I have filtered on the date range 12/1-1/9:
Fox & Haliburton On the Court / Mitchell Off the Court = -3.5 Net Rtg (111.9 Off Rtg & 115.4 Def Rtg over 289 minutes)
Fox & Mitchell On the Court / Haliburton Off the Court = -4.5 Net Rtg (113.0 Off Rtg & 117.5 Def Rtg over 104 minutes)
Haliburton & Mitchell On the Court / Fox Off the Court = +2.5 Net Rtg (110.8 Off Rtg & 108.3 Def Rtg over 154 minutes)
In both cases, it indicates that Haliburton/Mitchell is the most impactful young guard pairing we have despite Fox coming back around as of late.
Now this isn't the end all be all as this doesn't cleanly control for the quality of teammates and the quality of the competition, but it's interesting to say the least. Particularly defensively. A Def Rtg of 102.1 would be 1st in the league (GSW is currently at 102.2). Even 108.3 is a significant improvement from where we're at currently (would be 14th in the league).
Here is also their combined per36 min stats from 12/1-1/9 when they are on the court together:
Fox & Haliburton (289 minutes): .650 TS% / .525 FG% / .494 3PT% / .833 FT% / 42.7 PPG / 8.1 RPG / 12.0 APG / 3.2 SPG / 1.5 BPG / 4.1 TOPG
Fox & Mitchell (104 minutes): .558 TS% / .467 FG% / .423 3PT% / .762 FT% / 39.1 PPG / 8.0 RPG / 8.7 APG / 2.1 SPG / 0.7 BPG / 3.8 TOPG
Haliburton & Mitchell (154 minutes): .519 TS% / .441 FG% / .333 3PT% / .769 FT% / 27.8 PPG / 6.8 RPG / 13.6 APG / 0.9 SPG / 0.5 BPG / 3.3 TOPG
Looking at these stats, it seems a bit surprising that Haliburton & Mitchell are the most impactful pairing from an on/off standpoint as they basically have the worst stats in each category with the exception of assists and turnovers. Makes me question the Net Rtg of this group in that they may have been fortunate to play with better teammates or play against weaker competition. I mean when you're backcourt is averaging (per36 min when on the court together)...
De'Aaron Fox (289 minutes): .607 TS% / .517 FG% / .290 3PT% / .800 FT% / 25.5 PPG / 4.0 RPG / 4.2 APG / 1.6 SPG / 0.2 BPG / 2.1 TOPG
Ty. Haliburton (289 minutes): .734 TS% / .539 FG% / .625 3PT% / 1.000 FT% / 17.2 PPG / 4.1 RPG / 7.7 APG / 1.6 SPG / 1.2 BPG / 2.0 TOPG
...it's hard to come to the conclusion that they are the problem. However, advanced impact stats that are supposed to control for quality of teammates and competition tend to suggest Haliburton & Mitchell impact winning more than Fox...
LEBRON
Haliburton =+0.60
Fox = -1.00
Mitchell = -1.08
LA-RAPM
Mitchell = +0.96
Haliburton =+0.28
Fox = -2.33
Unfortunately, I don't have access to these stats by just looking at 12/1-1/9 so hard to see if Fox's improvements are coming through into his impact on the floor via these stats.
Agreed, which is why I wanted to post the advanced impact stats that attempt to control for such factors.We have to take into account that the Haliburton/Mitchell tandem plays the majority of their minutes against backups, which will make their numbers look better than the Haliburton/Fox tandem against starters.
In related news, according to NBA.com, Tyrese Haliburton is shooting a mind-boggling 62% on step-back threes and 64% on all step-back jumpers. Here is a supercut of all of his step-back attempts this season.
(EDIT: extra stat added) As of January 11th, Tyrese Haliburton is shooting 21/34 (61.8%) on threes and 27/42 (64.3%) total on shots officially marked as ste backs by the NBA.
That's pretty eye-opening. A 60% three (1.8 points per shot) is a must-take shot. In the halfcourt, the likelihood that you're going to get a better shot than that if you pass it up is basically zero. He's taking fewer than one stepback three per game, but at that percentage, you have to find a way to take a LOT more until you figure out whether that percentage is real. Hali should be strongly encouraged to take the step-back three whenever it is available regardless of the shot clock until such time as his percentage slumps. Like 5 or even 10 a game. If it becomes clear that he's really more like 35-40% at that shot, then drop the strategy. Otherwise, at 1.8 pps, start gunning, keep gunning.
60% because of Hali's internal clock as to whether it is a good or bad shot. If he increases the volume, the percentage drops.
I'd like to find out where that is because he doesn't need to be anywhere near that percentage to be more efficient than an average Kings shot.
Not sure if I understand your question, but my gut response is wiring. Even if Hali wanted to shoot more, he likely couldn’t pull the trigger. Kinda like Buddy, who even if he wanted to shoot less, he’ll pull the trigger whenever he thinks there is an opening.
Wiring is real. For example, what is the color of the following word: RED.
Notice how your brain processed RED in two different ways? That’s wiring.
Just for the record, "The Sacramento Kings have agreed to trade DeMarcus Cousins and Omri Casspi to the New Orleans Pelicans in exchange for Tyreke Evans, 2016 first-round draft pick Buddy Hield, Langston Galloway and first- and second-round draft picks this summer"
Boogie was unanimously one of, if not THE best C in the league at the time, to give credit where credit is due.
But I digress... not jumping into this again haha
We have to take into account that the Haliburton/Mitchell tandem plays the majority of their minutes against backups, which will make their numbers look better than the Haliburton/Fox tandem against starters.
Yet, not a single upper tier GM in the league would have chosen Cousins as their main big to build with.
Absolute statements regarding a topic/point to which the person has no chance of knowing the answer never ceases to amuse.
The real answer is that you only know what you would do.
That's pretty eye-opening. A 60% three (1.8 points per shot) is a must-take shot. In the halfcourt, the likelihood that you're going to get a better shot than that if you pass it up is basically zero.
Makes me wonder if we give Ty more freedom, could he be a mini-Zack Lavine (who was also a PG coming into the league) as far as efficiency, and recreate a similar dynamic duo with Fox being the midrange King that DeRozen is. (I understand DeMarr is huge sizewise compare to Fox, but ultimately is about getting to his spots)
Just throwing around some random ideas in my head... haha
(Feel free to let me know how wrong I am hahaha)
The fact is that there was very little interest around the league, when he was completely healthy in his peak prime. Vlade had very few options, but he knew he needed to trade him. A guy who was a center himself and coveted bigs
Makes me wonder if we give Ty more freedom, could he be a mini-Zack Lavine (who was also a PG coming into the league) as far as efficiency, and recreate a similar dynamic duo with Fox being the midrange King that DeRozen is. (I understand DeMarr is huge sizewise compare to Fox, but ultimately is about getting to his spots)
Just throwing around some random ideas in my head... haha
(Feel free to let me know how wrong I am hahaha)
iirc….
Cousins was deemed untouchable until the 25th hour when Vivek decided he wanted to trade him after all…. But only for Ingram or Buddy.
As usual ownership prepooped the bed.
Give it a rest, bro lolDo you recall anything about interest around the league? The word was that there was very little. He was viewed as a ticking time bomb, too risky. Not worth a big investment
Give it a rest, bro lol
I won't knock on the girl's door if her dad deems her untouchable until the 25th.