I have an idea. Might seem a little old fashioned, but what the heck?
Why don't we give this coach more than 100 games before we decide that he's not a good coach and that we need to hire someone else? How about two full seasons? Would that be too much to ask? I know his rotations suck, and I know that the team is not playing to expectations, but seriously, we're 15 games in. A lot of basketball to be played. A lot of new players on the team this year. I think it would be in the best interests of the team this year and moving forward to give Westphal a chance to learn his players tendencies, get into a groove and see what happens.
This is of particular importance in light of the fact that we've had four coaches in the last four seasons. You cannot grow as a team without continuity, or at least some semblance of it. You look around the league (and professional sports in general) at teams that hire and fire coaches the way we have been since Adelman, and none of them are successful. In the NBA, unless the coach is totally out of his league and doesn't know what the heck he's doing, you need to give him at least two years to show some signs of improvement, especially with a young and inexperienced team. Not to mention the roster turnover and injuries over the past several seasons that have killed any chance at a set lineup/rotation.
A lot of people had overblown expectations coming into this season, including fans on this board. Many had the Kings winning 40+ games this year. I don't think there's any question that they have the talent to do so, so the disappointment is understandable. But I don't think firing the head coach 15 games into his second season does any good. We're not a playoff caliber team in the Western conference. Might as well give the coach a chance to right the ship this season, and if he doesn't, then you can claim that you gave him a legitimate chance and he blew it. But 97 games is not a legitimate chance in the NBA.