only one ball to go around...it would of been a locker room blood bath for possessions
Warriors made it work.
only one ball to go around...it would of been a locker room blood bath for possessions
IT is guardable, smart teams will show that. The Wizards aren't a smart team. Wait until the Cavs wipe the floor with them. Look, I don't want to discredit what the Celts and IT have done, but let's be honest with ourselves. IT has free reign to go full chuck mode and not have to worry about a player or coach telling him not to do so. He is looking legendary in these first two games because the Wiz are incapable of playing any type of defense. I mean this is the playoffs and they've allowed consecutive 120+ PPG...I really don't see the fire and desire to really get physical. They chase IT around like he is a gopher rather than trapping him and making him pass over a swarm of hands. It's pitiful.
I'm just curious; What's the defensive rating of IT?Please. Get your head out of your rear. IT works in Boston because he is option 1a and 1b. with Cousins on the team, that was not going to happen. Celtics have nothing but role players around IT. Nothing special to be honest. Players know their role, defend, hit the three, give the ball to IT...looks good when they play a team who can't defend whatsoever.
Warriors made it work.
You do have to give the Celtics props for setting up IT and themselves to succeed. It's the same blueprint used by AI's Sixers filled with high end defensive roleplayers, but you have to wonder how far you can take this with IT. I wonder if these offensive explosions by IT are a curse in disguise though and the Celtics are going to talk themselves into giving him a four or five year max.
Whatever the case, the ECF is going to be a bore since Playoff Lebron has awoken and the rest of these East teams are pathetic.
I'm just curious; What's the defensive rating of IT?
By the time that competent front office comes around, another one would come in and get rid of one or both players. For all we know, Dave wouldn't be our head coach. Maybe Frank Vogel would be. Maybe Messina. Maybe Walton.
Warriors don't have ball dominant players, they have shooters.
The IT story is so hilarious to me, not because of IT, but because of people's reactions to IT. They just couldn't believe what they were seeing. The diamond was right there for them to grab, but they refused it because they saw him as a lump of coal. Then after years they grudgingly begin to see him as a lump of zinc, the little guy that can come off the bench. Now the adjectives used to describe him by HOFers are "great," "amazing" and "brilliant." And still in Kings land we hear the occasional: if he just came off the bench for us we might still have him and everything would be hunky dory. No, you still don't get it: IT was right from the very beginning and you were wrong. You were selling him short. The guy is an excellent starting point guard in this league and he's writing his own history, not you, and certainly not the clueless ones that sent him packing in Sacto and Phoenix. 53 points on 33 shots, with 20 points in the 4th quarter.
Whatever lets you sleep at night. The rest of the basketball world is laughing their ass off at us kicking IT to the curb.This is silly, IT today is not the player he was in Sacramento, the team is built/catered to his strengths and weaknesses in Boston, and he didn't last half a season in Phoenix, a team that is a complete tire fire yet allowed him pretty free run.
I'm happy he has found his niche in Boston, a team I like, but they're going to get steamrolled by Cleveland and they are damn lucky to have gotten past Chicago after Rondo went down.
The IT story is so hilarious to me, not because of IT, but because of people's reactions to IT. They just couldn't believe what they were seeing. The diamond was right there for them to grab, but they refused it because they saw him as a lump of coal. Then after years they grudgingly begin to see him as a lump of zinc, the little guy that can come off the bench. Now the adjectives used to describe him by HOFers are "great," "amazing" and "brilliant." And still in Kings land we hear the occasional: if he just came off the bench for us we might still have him and everything would be hunky dory. No, you still don't get it: IT was right from the very beginning and you were wrong. You were selling him short. The guy is an excellent starting point guard in this league and he's writing his own history, not you, and certainly not the clueless ones that sent him packing in Sacto and Phoenix. 53 points on 33 shots, with 20 points in the 4th quarter.
i know and that is who is at fault here. Our instability as a franchise has doomed us over and over when we had everything we ever needed housed already under our roof.
Durant and Curry have their fair share of ISO's plays. Durant has deferred much more this year than prior seasons, but it just goes to show what proper coaching can do.
The front office personnel responsible for his departure are long gone. Most of the Kings fan base looks on PDA and Mullin with scorn and derision, so I'm not really concerned by what "the rest of the basketball world" thinks either. They sucked and set us back 5 years. That's neither here nor there. I still don't see IT working out here and it was the second change of scenery, not the first, that largely set him straight.Whatever lets you sleep at night. The rest of the basketball world is laughing their ass off at us kicking IT to the curb.
Then we obviously chose the wrong "big ego".hindsight is always 20/20, but in reality....even if IT and Cousins were on the same team, it wouldn't of worked out, you can handle one big ego on a team..but two? forget it. That's just my opinion though.
It was the opportunity. In Sac he was option #3 behind Cousins and Gay(and btw he still averaged 20 and 6 with us despite that and he was a player in ascension). In Phoenix he was playing off the bench and they were starting Dragic and Bledsoe. They even tried to play all three together at times lol, just a Frankenstein experiment gone wrong, Sac and Phx two of the most incompetent franchises in recent memory. IT was/is clearly the best player of those three now. All Boston did was say "you know what this roster is full of role players and IT is clearly the best player , lets just put the ball in his hands and make things happen". Needless to say IT has more than delivered. Hes gone from nice story to potential HOF level player if he can keep this kind of production going for 4-5 more seasons. There is no reason that couldnt have happend here. IT is a born winner, he has the intangibles that the great players have. If he was four inches taller he is probably one of the top ten players in the world. As it stands he is clearly in the top 20. Yep no use for that for a great franchise like the Sacramento Kings. Just another feather in our incompetence cap, and probably the biggest.The front office personnel responsible for his departure are long gone. Most of the Kings fan base looks on PDA and Mullin with scorn and derision, so I'm not really concerned by what "the rest of the basketball world" thinks either. They sucked and set us back 5 years. That's neither here nor there. I still don't see IT working out here and it was the second change of scenery, not the first, that largely set him straight.
Then we obviously chose the wrong "big ego".
Let's give New Orleans a chance to compliment Cousins with the right players before we decide this. It's harder to build around bigs in this era since it's so guard dominant.
And once again you put the onus on Cousins. Was he perfect? No. Does he share the blame? Yes. Did the Kings problems predate him? Yes. He said, she said and the truth is in between.I've heard that prayer too many times. I would be shocked if it happens. If it does, it will last one season. A certain player will hold them hostage to get what he wants. Everything surrounding will crumble. Coaches, players and front office will come and go. On the merry go round will go.
Let's give New Orleans a chance to compliment Cousins with the right players before we decide this. It's harder to build around bigs in this era since it's so guard dominant.
I've heard that prayer too many times. I would be shocked if it happens. If it does, it will last one season. A certain player will hold them hostage to get what he wants. Everything surrounding will crumble. Coaches, players and front office will come and go. On the merry go round will go.
And the point is we had one of each. The best of both worlds.
The NBA has shifted to guard play no doubt but we would have had our own competitive advantage in an elite level big and an elite guard surrounded by hard nosed role players.
We even had a roster for it at the time:
C - DMC
PF - take your pick of Reggie Evans, Carl Landry, JT
SF - Omri, Quincy Acy
SG - Ben McLemore
PG - IT
Rudy as a trade chip to grab a 3 & D, SG or add depth
As men named Kelly go, there aren't many more deserving of catching a fade.Kelly Oubre laying the wood on another Kelly put a smile on my face![]()