Big Cuz 15
All-Star
we have the talent to be a great team. good distributor, capable 2 guard defender/shooter, small forward, defensive 4 (injured atm), dominant center. can we get a REAL chef that knows how to cook with these ingredients?
More like...just plain disgusted.
Yeah, that is the issue. We've been doing this coaching carousel thing for way too long as is. Switching coaches is awful for stability. It is just that Karl is SUCH a HORRIBLE fit for Cuz, that we've been backed into a corner. Do we stick with Karl, who is going to retire in two years anyways. Or do we stick with Cuz, who has 8 to 10 years of a dominant prime left in his career? I think it's a no brainer, but it is also an awful decision to have to make.
Which is why I'm still fuming over the Malone firing. I'm gonna be mad about that asinine decision for as long as we're still suffering its effects.
But yeah, if we fire Karl, we need a slam dunk sure fire 100 percent gonna work out coach lined up. Thibs? Who knows...
Anyone else concerned that this sets up a trade request from Cousins camp in the near future, especially considering this story comes out when he is in DC where his buddy John Wall plays?
he indeed looks lost out there, hopefully these comments stem from frustration and he is committed to fighting through it. Most of the recent chatter has been about the team starting to get on the same page. Odd.
...He hasn't been "bringing it" for a pretty long while now, and he's actually wearing down enough of the fan base that I don't think there will be a fan revolt if they move him now.
I honestly don't think there are many, if any Cousins haters. I think people have just become kind of tired to his inconsistent effort every night and the losing. When he's putting 100% in while using his aggression for positive plays, he looks like a top 10 player. However, when he has games like last night, then blames his defense on coaching..it kind of makes you scratch your head. On defense, we saw him slow on rotations, and sometimes not even contesting Gortat.Also:
I get why Cuz has haters. When he is frustrated he dogs it on the court. He goes into "Who cares" mode.....It is annoying as hell and really hurts us in a lot of games. He really needs to be a better leader, and step his professionalism up.
Thing is.... This franchise needs to stop giving him so many reasons to be frustrated! We have had THE WORST owners, GMs (I like what Vlade has done so far though), and coaches (well, besides the guy who got fired for winning too much with a boring style) possible during Cousins' tenure as a King. Its insane.
Also:
I get why Cuz has haters.
I honestly don't think there are many, if any Cousins haters. I think people have just become kind of tired to his inconsistent effort every night and the losing. When he's putting 100% in while using his aggression for positive plays, he looks like a top 10 player. However, when he has games like last night, then blames his defense on coaching..it kind of makes you scratch your head. On defense, we saw him slow on rotations, and sometimes not even contesting Gortat.
I think Karl needs to be blamed too...especially for putting Cuz on the perimeter and 3pt line way too much. Not sure why he doesn't use him more in the high post. However, we've heavily invested in Cousins as our franchise player. In 2015, it's hard to have your franchise player be a big man. I don't think there are any teams out there in the NBA who have a big man as their franchise player. Detroit comes pretty close, but it's Reggie Jackson. Utah comes close, but it's still Gordon Hayward. I think Cousins has to be your 2nd best player to be successful. It also doesn't help that Rudy Gay is mad inconsistent.
All fans want is winning basketball...or at least a direction. It doesn't seem like we can win with Cousins as our franchise player after watching him for 6 years. His ceiling is so high, but I'm not sure that he can reach it while here in Sacramento. I have a theoretical question.. if we don't reach 40wins this season, and the Celtics have Ben Simmons and Marcus Smart available. Would you trade Cousins for 1 of the most revolutionary prospects? It's certainly on the table right now if we decide to go that route. If we trade Cousins, chances are that Rudy is traded too. I don't think we'd have any use for Rondo left. We'd have LOADS of cap space left. 2016 FAs: Batum, Horford, Noah, Conley, Anderson, Fournier, Beal, Barnes, Motiejunas, Whiteside, and Clarkson. In bold are players 25 or younger. So if we go rebuild again, I think we'd be ok.
The Wolves are 2 years gone from Kevin Love and they have a monster team right now in Rubio, LaVine, Shabazz, Wiggins, and KAT. It looks like they'll be in the playoffs next year. If the Wolves can rebuild fairly easy, can the Kings follow? It makes it even better than we actually have good role players and pieces around our
team. We have Collison, McLemore, Belinelli, Casspi, WCS, and Kofus if we decide to blow it all up. These are all players who could be contributors in a playoff squad.
We might have close to $40million in cap space next year if we trade Cousins and Gay while getting back a few pieces.
I just wish Cousins would play at his higher level a lot more. He has so much passion for the game, but it hurts when he decides to blow it all off. Kings fans have experienced losing for way too long. I think we have to shake things up if this season doesn't go according to plan.
Saying his critics are "haters" is like saying supporters are "fan boys". I don't think Cousin supporters would appreciate be called fan boys. Critics and fans of the Kings are frustrated by Cousins play recently and venting that frustration. Cousins is one of my favorite players but I have been as critical as anyone recently. I certainly don't hate him. I think he's a great player with a good heart with a few issues he needs to sort out. All of us have "issues" to various degrees, some more than others![]()
Denver really thrived since his departure........Yes, this is Karl's philosophy and is partly why he got fired in Denver. All the exact same problems exist here.
http://grantland.com/the-triangle/a...-is-out-in-denver-and-where-he-may-be-headed/
George Karl knew this wouldn't work with boogie and it'd be a struggle. He has no need for a dominant post center, never had, never will. And won't change to fit the team. He's dead set on the "process" of turning Boogie into a good 3 point shooter, cause then, titles. I personally have no idea why. But he's completely willing to lose now in order to achieve that goal. There's a quote out there indicating as much but I'm not going to look for it.
It's the underwear gnome plan. 1)make boogie a 3 point shooter. 2)??? 3) Title contention.
That's why Karl tried to trade him. It was trade him or "fix" him. And Boogie's agent was on board knowing what a stubborn old **** Karl is.
We are in the fixing stage. And Boogie's body can't do it.
Vivek and Vlade know what they have (Vlade seems to have convinced Vivek). So does Karl. He just doesn't want it. He wants an Ervin Johnson, a Koufos and all the other no offense centers he's had through the years. He flat out stopped playing McGee in Denver basically ending his career as a productive nba player.
Karl is already using WCS like he used McGee, which is to say sparingly.
From the above article of why Denver fired him.
'There’s a lot of sense in that. But Karl’s teams never quite mastered the art of switching. They’d miscommunicate now and then, so that two defenders would chase one player instead of switching assignments. And they’d repeatedly switch themselves into obviously more terrible matchups that opponents would happily exploit over and over; Kobe Bryant slaughtered Denver with post-ups in the 2012 playoffs in part because the Nuggets stubbornly switched on Ramon Sessions–Kobe pick-and-rolls, leaving Lawson or Prof. Andre Miller to check Kobe."
This is describing what were very good nuggets teams catered to Karl's style. It just goes nowhere. We could give Karl everything he wants, win 55 games, and go out in the first round every year. Cause he's still going to allow a Rondo on a Paul pierce or Blake griffin in a horrible mismatch with the game on the line.
It's not the system. Karl believes his system is flawless and proven. So it's the players. Has to be.
It's just sad. And Karl blames the players for not switching aggressively enough, poopoo like that. Deja vu. Karl ain't changing.
Can we maybe chill with the term "haters"? It's reductive. No one and no Kings fans in their right mind hates Cousins. This kid paid for a funeral and recently bought a family a new car. And even if he didn't someone would have to be fairly unstable to hate a person for playing basketball poorly.
Saying his critics are "haters" is like saying supporters are "fan boys". I don't think Cousin supporters would appreciate be called fan boys. Critics and fans of the Kings are frustrated by Cousins play recently and venting that frustration. Cousins is one of my favorite players but I have been as critical as anyone recently. I certainly don't hate him. I think he's a great player with a good heart with a few issues he needs to sort out. All of us have "issues" to various degrees, some more than others![]()
I, for one, would object.
Seriously, you make a good point but unfortunately the term "hater" has a long and distinguished history on almost all fan boards. And, also unfortunately, in some cases, the comments of certain "critics" come across as much more than mere criticism.
There is no other way to say it than using the term hater in my opinion. Some people take this term way to seriously on a fan board. At this point right now, I'm a Karl hater. Karl is probably going to end up in the HOF but it sure doesn't mean I can't hate what he's doing right now. Hes got a roster that should succeed and I put the blame at his feet.I, for one, would object.
Seriously, you make a good point but unfortunately the term "hater" has a long and distinguished history on almost all fan boards. And, also unfortunately, in some cases, the comments of certain "critics" come across as much more than mere criticism.
DMC is featured in this months SLAM magazine
--------
DMC: I love Sacramento. I consider this home, so that’s not the problem. The losing is.
SLAM: So you working on your legacy?
DMC: All that comes into play. I want my legacy to be here, I want my number in the rafters here. I want that storyline to be he changed things around in Sacramento.
--------
I f'in love this guy.
I'd rather hire Thibs in the off-season when Karl gets fired.
SLAM: Is it as easy for you as it looks?
DMC: On the court? Absolutely, it’s easy. Nobody can guard me.
SLAM: With some of the other big guys it looks like work. Getting 25 and 12 seems to sort of just happen for you.
DMC: I hate to sound cocky, but it’s easy.
SLAM: So are you the best big in the League?
DMC: By far.
Read more at http://www.slamonline.com/antidote/#H4utAorsfctVLpR0.99
Denver really thrived since his departure........
A long and distinguished history does not legitimize the use of a word. I know you are unhappy with Karl. If I said "Oh you are just a hater where the Kings coach is concerned" I think you would take exception to this label because it undermines the merits of your opinion. You may have rational points of view in regards to his coaching performance but if I say you are just a hater I am claiming your opinions are irrational and rooted in disproportionate level of personal animosity.
Regardless if someone hates a player or coach for performing poorly, they need to lay off the bottle or seek counseling, or go to AA and kill two birds with one stone![]()
I would adamantly disagree with this on behalf of myself and others. I hate ISIS. I don't hate guys who run around in baggy shorts. I may dislike a player for his approach to the game or playing style (James Harden comes to mind). But hate is a strong word that I don't think she be thrown around in this context.. Pretty much everyone on here at one point or another has hated a player or coach for something.
Yes, this is Karl's philosophy and is partly why he got fired in Denver. All the exact same problems exist here.
http://grantland.com/the-triangle/a...-is-out-in-denver-and-where-he-may-be-headed/
George Karl knew this wouldn't work with boogie and it'd be a struggle. He has no need for a dominant post center, never had, never will. And won't change to fit the team. He's dead set on the "process" of turning Boogie into a good 3 point shooter, cause then, titles. I personally have no idea why. But he's completely willing to lose now in order to achieve that goal. There's a quote out there indicating as much but I'm not going to look for it.
It's the underwear gnome plan. 1)make boogie a 3 point shooter. 2)??? 3) Title contention.
That's why Karl tried to trade him. It was trade him or "fix" him. And Boogie's agent was on board knowing what a stubborn old **** Karl is.
We are in the fixing stage. And Boogie's body can't do it.
Vivek and Vlade know what they have (Vlade seems to have convinced Vivek). So does Karl. He just doesn't want it. He wants an Ervin Johnson, a Koufos and all the other no offense centers he's had through the years. He flat out stopped playing McGee in Denver basically ending his career as a productive nba player.
Karl is already using WCS like he used McGee, which is to say sparingly.
From the above article of why Denver fired him.
'There’s a lot of sense in that. But Karl’s teams never quite mastered the art of switching. They’d miscommunicate now and then, so that two defenders would chase one player instead of switching assignments. And they’d repeatedly switch themselves into obviously more terrible matchups that opponents would happily exploit over and over; Kobe Bryant slaughtered Denver with post-ups in the 2012 playoffs in part because the Nuggets stubbornly switched on Ramon Sessions–Kobe pick-and-rolls, leaving Lawson or Prof. Andre Miller to check Kobe."
This is describing what were very good nuggets teams catered to Karl's style. It just goes nowhere. We could give Karl everything he wants, win 55 games, and go out in the first round every year. Cause he's still going to allow a Rondo on a Paul pierce or Blake griffin in a horrible mismatch with the game on the line.
It's not the system. Karl believes his system is flawless and proven. So it's the players. Has to be.
It's just sad. And Karl blames the players for not switching aggressively enough, poopoo like that. Deja vu. Karl ain't changing.