I'm really liking DiVincenzo and think he can be a solid starting SG next to Fox next year. I really hope this report is untrue (or that it can at least be sorted out).
Below are DiVincenzo's per36 min stats with us this year:
- TS% = .532
- FGA = 11.8
- FG% = .362
- 2PA = 4.0
- 2P% = .351
- 3PA = 7.8
- 3P% = .368
- FTA = 3.0
- FT% = .839
- PPG = 14.0
- RPG = 6.0
- APG = 4.8
- SPG = 2.0
- BPG = 0.3
- TOPG = 2.4
- AST:TO = 2.02
That's a pretty solid role playing, 3&D starting SG and those numbers don't really differ from his last season in Milwaukee when he was healthy:
- TS% = .542
- FGA = 12.0
- FG% = .420
- 2PA = 5.1
- 2P% = .475
- 3PA = 6.9
- 3P% = .379
- FTA = 1.4
- FT% = .718
- PPG = 13.7
- RPG = 7.5
- APG = 4.0
- SPG = 1.4
- BPG = 0.3
- TOPG = 1.8
- AST:TO = 2.23
PPG, RPG, APG, SPG, AST:TO, & 3P% are all similar, but the major difference is that he's been shooting .351 from two while he shot .475 from two in Milwaukee.
If he's consistently knocking down his C&S 3s, his ball handling, passing, unselfishness, defense, rebounding, & hustle would fit extremely well with Fox.
I'm really liking DiVincenzo and think he can be a solid starting SG next to Fox next year. I really hope this report is untrue (or that it can at least be sorted out).
Below are DiVincenzo's per36 min stats with us this year:
- TS% = .532
- FGA = 11.8
- FG% = .362
- 2PA = 4.0
- 2P% = .351
- 3PA = 7.8
- 3P% = .368
- FTA = 3.0
- FT% = .839
- PPG = 14.0
- RPG = 6.0
- APG = 4.8
- SPG = 2.0
- BPG = 0.3
- TOPG = 2.4
- AST:TO = 2.02
That's a pretty solid role playing, 3&D starting SG and those numbers don't really differ from his last season in Milwaukee when he was healthy:
- TS% = .542
- FGA = 12.0
- FG% = .420
- 2PA = 5.1
- 2P% = .475
- 3PA = 6.9
- 3P% = .379
- FTA = 1.4
- FT% = .718
- PPG = 13.7
- RPG = 7.5
- APG = 4.0
- SPG = 1.4
- BPG = 0.3
- TOPG = 1.8
- AST:TO = 2.23
PPG, RPG, APG, SPG, AST:TO, & 3P% are all similar, but the major difference is that he's been shooting .351 from two while he shot .475 from two in Milwaukee.
If he's consistently knocking down his C&S 3s, his ball handling, passing, unselfishness, defense, rebounding, & hustle would fit extremely well with Fox.
Yep it all comes down to how well he can shoot. Ideally Fox needs a knock down shooter next to him since he struggles himself but I don't think a Buddy Hield that plays defense is available so DDV is the best option the Kings have.
What's promising is DDV's C&S percentages were much higher than his percentages off the bounce. Also Fox shot 38% from 3 during the last 6 games and that was on almost 6 attempts a game. His previous 43 games, he shot 25% on 3.7 attempts. Hopefully he figured something out at the end of the season.
DDV checks a lot of boxes next to Fox. If he can shoot, he'll be a good fit.
And because donkey Gentry refused to start him when Sabonis was playing, we didn't get to see much of his off-ball game/cutting in full effect off the Sabonis playmaking.
At the end of the day, he's just a good player that the Kings can't afford to lose or replace in a season they have to make the playoffs.
Yeah, admittedly, he's not the ideal height/length and his shooting isn't elite (which is obviously preferable), but how many players can do what DiVincenzo does while also being 6'6"+ w/ a 6'10"+ wingspan and shooting 40%+ from 3? At a certain point, are we just being nit picky?
To give him credit, he shot 37.9% from 3 on 6.9 3PA (per36) last year and has shot 36.8% from 3 on 7.8 3PA (per36) with us this year. Yeah it's not 40%+, but his volume is sizeable as well. And like others have pointed out, he has shot 42.2% from 3 on C&S opportunities with us this year which is critical when playing off-ball to Fox. .
DiVincenzo is one of the pieces that excites me about next year once we get the rest of the gang back & healthy.
QO is a one year deal. Best case is a 3 year deal with an option for 4 at a reasonable price?
With the way our cap situation’s shaping up, we might still have max money next summer even with DDV on the books.Exactly, with the QO it's off the books for the max summer. The Kings can then decide what's what.
With the way our conversation situation’s shaping up, we might still have max money next summer even with DDV on the books.
I don't understand why you would not want to lock up DDV for a few years at a reasonable price rather than let him have a great year next year and have to compete to re-sign him? Now sure if the guy is hell bound to go out and find an Atlanta willing to overpay and throw in poison pills to the deal I guess that's something to be concerned with, but in that case he isn't signing the lowball tender deal either.
Assuming DiVincenzo signs a similar deal as Holmes:With the way our cap situation’s shaping up, we might still have max money next summer even with DDV on the books.
Sometimes it seems like both the Kings and Kings fans are just plain allergic to quality role players. DiVincenzo needs to be locked up long-term, particularly since there likely isn't much of a market this offseason for another franchise to throw an outrageous contract at him that the Kings might someday regret matching. When healthy and in proper form, DDV is exactly the kind of player that winning teams give 30 mpg regardless of whether or not he's starting (and for the record, I'm firmly in the "start him" camp).
I'm against starting him hes not starter level IMO unless you have a mega star on the roster. I would look to move Holmes and sign Monk first before I negotiate with DDV.Sometimes it seems like both the Kings and Kings fans are just plain allergic to quality role players. DiVincenzo needs to be locked up long-term, particularly since there likely isn't much of a market this offseason for another franchise to throw an outrageous contract at him that the Kings might someday regret matching. When healthy and in proper form, DDV is exactly the kind of player that winning teams give 30 mpg regardless of whether or not he's starting (and for the record, I'm firmly in the "start him" camp).
Assuming DiVincenzo signs a similar deal as Holmes:
View attachment 11019
We're certainly within striking distance of a max spot. Moving Holmes for an expiring and a cheap piece (and finishing better than the 7th worst record next year) will definitely help.
I'm against starting him hes not starter level IMO unless you have a mega star on the roster. I would look to move Holmes and sign Monk first before I negotiate with DDV.
And in a worst case, you might have pull out a horrendous JT style dump of a 1st rounder in desperation to get that space. Worth the gamble? Hmm... wasn't before.
I'm against starting him hes not starter level IMO unless you have a mega star on the roster. I would look to move Holmes and sign Monk first before I negotiate with DDV.
You only make that type of move if a guy of that caliber wants to sign with you. Vlade made the mistake of making that type of trade without any max FA wanting to sign here. He gambled when he had no business doing so.And in a worst case, you might have pull out a horrendous JT style dump of a 1st rounder in desperation to get that space. Worth the gamble? Hmm... wasn't before.
Not on this board. They make it sound like signing that Jason Thompson, or Holmes, or whoever is the make or break. And then subsequently watch that contract become an albatross. You re-sign those players when proven to be a major part of the winning ingredient. Prioritizing role players while mired in mediocrity gets you stuck. As the Kings have shown time and again over the last 16 years.
Not on this board. They make it sound like signing that Jason Thompson, or Holmes, or whoever is the make or break. And then subsequently watch that contract become an albatross. You re-sign those players when proven to be a major part of the winning ingredient. Prioritizing role players while mired in mediocrity gets you stuck. As the Kings have shown time and again over the last 16 years.
I wonder if Houston would be interested in trading Christian Wood for Holmes? Holmes wouldn't take shots away from their young players and Woods could start next to Sabonas.Oh please. Holmes contract is not an albatross.
Re-signing DDV isn't going to prevent the Kings from having cap room in the future, nor would it distract from their attempt to break into the playoffs. That's what their lottery pick this year is for. They'll either use that pick to select the next piece of their "core", or they'll package it in a trade for the next piece of their "core". Either way, you don't climb out of mediocrity by bleeding talent, and DiVincenzo is considerably more talented than a whole host of roleplayers the Kings have overpaid in the last decade. And, at 25 years old, he's in perfect alignment with the Kings' current timeline. Monte has decided to roll with Sabonis and Fox, so there's no sense letting a strong complementary piece walk when he's gotta make this work before Sabonis hits free agency.
I don't think it's a money issue, but rather a what kind of role is DDV willing to play issue. Keeping talent is important, but pigeon holding a player to a role that he doesn't want to play is going to cause a number of other issues. The Kings can match any offer, but if dude doesn't want to play with an extremely ball dominant lead guard and compete with another ball dominant guard on the roster, do a sign and trade and let it be.
I'm sure DDV knows that he is not a dominant ball handler. He seemed happy in Milwaukee playing with Giannis, Middleton and Jrue.
I don't know of a single team that is just going to let DDV take over the majority of the playmaking.
I'm sure DDV knows that he is not a dominant ball handler. He seemed happy in Milwaukee playing with Giannis, Middleton and Jrue.
I don't know of a single team that is just going to let DDV take over the majority of the playmaking.