UKRAINE
G-League
Im quite happy that there is now a dream team out there to make little kids wearing kobe bryant jerseys cry.
quote of the day!

Im quite happy that there is now a dream team out there to make little kids wearing kobe bryant jerseys cry.
In fact, not only has he ensured that he'll never be thought of as the GOAT, but he's also ensured that, no matter how many championships he wins, he'll always have one less than Dwyane Wade.
if this was meant for me i apologize. i didnt quote you, hoping you didnt think my reply was directed only towards you. but many disregard the argument of james not having a supporting cast. and after reading your post, it reminded me of their posts. as to you quote though, you said so yourself the playoffs are different. you can rack up wins in the regular season just going through the motions when you play teams like the nets, knicks, and so forth. in the playoffs, the lack of good players only take you so far. something james probably understands now. he is not blameless for not taking them all the way, but with better players, it probably wouldnt even be a topic. as for how he treated the cavs/cavs fans. i totally agree with you. he did it in a horrible manner.
where he could have gone...everyone has different opinions. i think if he went to chi...he definitely would have been in MJ's shadow forever. no matter what he did it would never be good enough to surpass jordan. it will ALWAYS be jordan's team. he probably knows that so he didnt choose them. i dont think anyone in their right minds would go to the knicks or clips. their front office is horrible and i doubt they would go anywhere. the clips seem to always have a good team, but never go anywhere. maybe they are cursed? back when kobe was thinking of leaving the lakers, i was praying that he would go to the clips and turn them around.
As an aside, I think there's another aspect of this question that hasn't been raised: do the Heat really stand a chance against upper echelon teams in the playoffs? Their biggest weakness, aside from depth, is going to be the front court. Bosh is nice, but what happens when he goes up alone (or with the geriatric duo of Z and Shaq) against the big rotations of the Celtics, Heat, Lakers, and Bulls? The one reason I thought Chicago was a top choice was because Boozer and Noah will be a very good frontcourt to take into battle against Gasol/Bynum/Odom or Garnett/Perkins/O'neal. Bosh is going to get exposed in a major way in the playoffs, and I'm not sure if Wade/Lebron can cover that up. LBJ may very well end up turning into a de facto PF come playoffs.
If the Heat don't get some major help up front, I don't think you can call them the clear-cut favorites to win it all. Top 5 team? No doubt. Most talented? For sure. Built to last in the playoffs? Not so much.
Well, I know that, if he has none, and Wade has one, and he and Wade are teammates, well... let x equal the number of championships LeBron has, then the number of championships Wade has equals x + 1.Really? So I guess you already know how may years they will play together or just play? Please tell me? Or do you only know what people cannot do?
Well, I know that, if he has none, and Wade has one, and he and Wade are teammates, well... let x equal the number of championships LeBron has, then the number of championships Wade has equals x + 1.
And LeBron is only 25 y.o. and signed only a 6-y. contract?? And may be at some point they will not play together? Could you also add this to your arithmetics?
I happen to think that he's got about as much chance of winning a championship seven years from now, without Dwyane Wade, as he had of winning a championship a year ago without Dwyane Wade. So, yeah... it kinda does.
This might be a valid argument if he'd won without Kobe... but, of course, he hasn't. And he won't. Just like LeBron James isn't going to win without Dwyane Wade.Morrison has no chance to win something in NBA by default and somehow he's got 2 rings. So, no ... it kinda does not.
This might be a valid argument if he'd won without Kobe... but, of course, he hasn't. And he won't. Just like LeBron James isn't going to win without Dwyane Wade.
May be, he will play with someone who is even better than Kobe at the end of his career ... do you already know LeBron's teammates in 10 years? Or it is again based on i-told-you-so or i-think/hope-so-and-then-it-must-be-true scientific assumptions?
This has been one of my biggest problems with all the pundants already putting them in the Finals next year. They need a lot of help in the front court, especially on defense (won't be helped by Bosh there). And their lack of depth will have to be filled mostly by players will to take the league minimum. They can't eve count on the draft in the future, as it seems like they have given up a lot of future draft picks in getting both James and Bosh. On top of it all, they better hope that the new CBA doesn't have the hard cap that the owners all want to put in place. They won't be the only team hurt if that happens (the Lakers would take a major hit as well), but it would certainly stall their little coup down in Miami.
May be, he will play with someone who is even better than Kobe at the end of his career ...
Which would only serve to prove that he was only able to win with another great player. Which would, in fact, support my argument, not yours.
But, I will grant you this one concession: LeBron James is subjugating himself, and becoming second banana to Dwyane Wade, in order to win championships. If he ends up leaving Miami, and goes somewhere else to become someone else's second banana... then yes, he may end up with more championships than Dwyane Wade. And he will still not be thought of as the greatest.
That is the legacy of LeBron James: he had to go to another guy's team to win. He's not going to Miami as an equal, the way that Garnett and Allen did when they ended up in Boston: he's not on equal footing with Dwyane Wade. And, he's never going to be, as long as they're on the same team. We've already seen that he can't carry a team on his own, and there's no reason to belive that that's going to be any different seven years from now, so he's going to have to go play second fiddle to somebody else to win again.
Now, there's no shame in going to be someone else's sidekick to win a championship, and that's all well and to the good when you're Robert Horry or Horace Grant, but when you're a guy who's been in the conversation for greatest ever, and you go to another guy's team to win, you are permanently, and irrevocably, taken out of that conversation.
Here's a thought: When LeBron and Bosh were introduced with Wade yesterday in Miami they weren't introduced as the King and his court or Miami has their King or any other nonsense, they were announced as The Three Kings. LeBron is no longer "The King" he is "a king". And I think it fits in with what Slim is saying - he's out of THE GOAT discussion, for now if not permanantly if he can't even be the king of his own castle.
PS. Hi Bozzwell.
Which would only serve to prove that he was only able to win with another great player. Which would, in fact, support my argument, not yours.
But, I will grant you this one concession: LeBron James is subjugating himself, and becoming second banana to Dwyane Wade, in order to win championships. If he ends up leaving Miami, and goes somewhere else to become someone else's second banana... then yes, he may end up with more championships than Dwyane Wade. And he will still not be thought of as the greatest.
That is the legacy of LeBron James: he had to go to another guy's team to win. He's not going to Miami as an equal, the way that Garnett and Allen did when they ended up in Boston: he's not on equal footing with Dwyane Wade. And, he's never going to be, as long as they're on the same team. We've already seen that he can't carry a team on his own, and there's no reason to belive that that's going to be any different seven years from now, so he's going to have to go play second fiddle to somebody else to win again.
Now, there's no shame in going to be someone else's sidekick to win a championship, and that's all well and to the good when you're Robert Horry or Horace Grant, but when you're a guy who's been in the conversation for greatest ever, and you go to another guy's team to win, you are permanently, and irrevocably, taken out of that conversation.
Here's a thought: When LeBron and Bosh were introduced with Wade yesterday in Miami they weren't introduced as the King and his court or Miami has their King or any other nonsense, they were announced as The Three Kings. LeBron is no longer "The King" he is "a king". And I think it fits in with what Slim is saying - he's out of THE GOAT discussion, for now if not permanantly if he can't even be the king of his own castle.
PS. Hi Bozzwell.
It was a presentation. Of course they said they are the Three Kings. What do you want from the announcer? He should have said - "This is the King, Sancho Panza and someone from Toronto"??
When you are 36 y.o., yes, you might need another Kobe-like player to win. So, it does not support your argument. Actually, at all.
IMO Wade will be a "second banana". We will see. Life will show who is the first and who is the second. It does not matter who was there first. If they win 5 titles and LeBron gets 4-5 PO MVPs, then what? WHo will be the "second banana or apple"?
No, it's because he's been on the Heat longer AND led them to a championship, as THE guy. Quit acting like this is not important: when you're The Man on your team, and you actually win, you don't displaced from being The Man just because you get another talented player, ESPECIALLY if they haven't accomplished as much as you have. If you've NEVER won, like with Robinson, another great player can come in and usurp you as The Man, but when you've won, as THE guy, you're The Man until you hang it up. That's how that works.I really don't see why lebron is looked at as a second banana to wade. Is it because wade has been on the heat longer?
I really don't see why lebron is looked at as a second banana to wade. Is it because wade has been on the heat longer? It's not like the heat have an established team and they're trying to work lebron into the mix. All of these guys need to learn how to play together and this team is starting from scratch. To think that lebron cannot be THE man in Miami or that he's riding wades coattails is ludacrous.
I really don't see why lebron is looked at as a second banana to wade. Is it because wade has been on the heat longer? It's not like the heat have an established team and they're trying to work lebron into the mix. All of these guys need to learn how to play together and this team is starting from scratch. To think that lebron cannot be THE man in Miami or that he's riding wades coattails is ludacrous.