At this point, a lot of public "broadcasters" are repeatedly embarrassing themselves re: Cousins, because they keep proving they simply don't listen or watch what he says or does.
Both of the critiques they forced on Cousins in this interview boiled down to :
1) Cousins simply doesn't want to win enough, and cares more about his personal stats (minutes, shots) then the team collective approach.
2) Cousins doesn't have the same mentality as Curry, who impressed Pollard in a recent report by saying he wants his coach to point out what he's doing wrong.
Pollard, Morgan and Deuce obviously missed the report where Demarcus and Rondo went out of their way to get a meeting with Karl to (reportedly) use them as examples when they do something wrong to teach the other players and get better.
How do Deuce and Morgan expect to have any credibility when they conveniently forget anything that doesn't fit their narrative re: Cousins?
Also, this podcast seems like the technical aspects are beyond them. There's audio distortion even on the hosts voices, recorded right in their "studio"!
The number of technical glitches on a simple phonecall causing numerous drop-outs in the interview, combined with the hosts' inability to communicate with their guest, shows serious amateurity.
Wait a minute - of all the players in the NBA they like (and go out of their way to defend), it's Draymond Green?!?
Morgan actually said "He's one of the most passionate players out there on the floor - you can call it angry or whatever some way people want to put it, I know you're all a little dramatic and sensitive..."
They continually prove their bias by defending Draymond for the same characteristics that they demonize Demarcus for.