macadocious
Starter
Ham is Sacramento's version of Chris Haynes.
Chris Haynes is Sacramento's version of Chris Haynes.
Ham is Sacramento's version of Chris Haynes.
What did Mike Brown say that offended him? From what I remember he got asked why the “leaders” weren’t speaking to the media, and all he said was he never knows who speaks after the game and that Fox, Sabonis and the whole team should be held accountable.
The speculation is that he didn't like being criticized by Mike Brown for not talking to the media, after the most recent home blow out loss to New Orleans. That was when they sent Keon Ellis to the post game podium to answer questions, as a two way contract player who hadn't played hardly at all.
May have been something behind the scenes of what we see. I can't imagine having Keon Ellis go to the podium to face the media after that blowout loss, was just ignored by everyone in the organization.....or maybe nobody cared and nothing was said about it, but I doubt it. It wasn't a good look
tbh it was all a bunch of twitter outrage. I don't watch the post games after a blow out, I go find some way to try to salvage any fun left in the evening.May have been something behind the scenes of what we see. I can't imagine having Keon Ellis go to the podium to face the media after that blowout loss, was just ignored by everyone in the organization.....or maybe nobody cared and nothing was said about it, but I doubt it. It wasn't a good look
doesn't help that we have a lot of antagonistic reporters fishing for content. I know Sacramento isn't a "tough" market but when guys like Ham and Anderson won't let stuff lie they probably do more damage than serious reporters like those in the big markets.You know what I think is a bad look? The NBA forcing players who have just lost a game to do media availability. Players should be exempt from media availability after losses (can appear optionally), and the coaching staff should be exempt from media availability after losses of 15+ points. Anything else is insult to injury.
Or just the whole "how does it make you feel that Brown is underutilizing you, must be frustrating to be buried in the corner" that he'd ask all the time. Dude, if you want to know why Monte doesn't feed you content look at your content.Honestly this sorta reminds of when Keegan was playing bad at the start of last season and Ham and the Hamsters all got angry and hounded people for an explanation to the point that they forced Keegan's dad to go public with the fact that his grandma had a stroke AT HIS GAME and we all felt very good about forcing a family to reveal personal tragedy like that.
Saw this posted elsewhere:
Sam Amick said he's not going to share everything publicly, but does go onto say that it's a weird situation because De'Aaron was upset that he took criticism for not being at the podium after the Pelicans blowout. Amick highlights that the Sac Bee recently reported that Fox wasn't asked to talk because he had a bad game, and as a result, they decided to give him a night off. Amick goes onto call it a "bad set of circumstances to where he just went dark."
Not sure how I feel about this...
Our media is soft compared to most. Fox is a superstar who scored 3pts in a 33pt blow-out. In his place, they sent Keon Ellis to the podium. Up until that game, Ellis was completely out of the rotation and was only subbed in because it was a blow-out. Ellis played a grand total of 12minutes and was sent up to face the media. They made Ellis the fall guy. I think it was fair for Ham to ask why the leaders weren't out there instead.
Something is off with the team this year.
Saw this posted elsewhere:
Sam Amick said he's not going to share everything publicly, but does go onto say that it's a weird situation because De'Aaron was upset that he took criticism for not being at the podium after the Pelicans blowout. Amick highlights that the Sac Bee recently reported that Fox wasn't asked to talk because he had a bad game, and as a result, they decided to give him a night off. Amick goes onto call it a "bad set of circumstances to where he just went dark."
Not sure how I feel about this...
Our media is soft compared to most. Fox is a superstar who scored 3pts in a 33pt blow-out. In his place, they sent Keon Ellis to the podium. Up until that game, Ellis was completely out of the rotation and was only subbed in because it was a blow-out. Ellis played a grand total of 12minutes and was sent up to face the media. They made Ellis the fall guy. I think it was fair for Ham to ask why the leaders weren't out there instead.
Something is off with the team this year.
I suspect it’s something else going on (or there’s more to the explanation that has been given thus far).
Soft for getting butthurt over the media asking where the leaders were when he wasn’t specifically called out. Jason’s cryptic tweet makes me think it could be tied into Brown’s response during the press conference.So, let me get this right. If Fox didn’t want to go to the podium or got bent out of shape because of all the dumb crape brought up by our dumb reporters(Ham, J Anderson), he’s soft? LOLOL.
This guy has carried this franchise for awhile now, played his ass off, by all accounts is a good guy who isn’t involved in anything nefarious, brought his personal trainer or shooting coach to his honeymoon because he and his wife knew how important it was, spent a Summer getting Keegan Murray ready and better, on and on…..this guy is soft?
It’s an embarrassing take by some.
I'd also seen reports of him coughing in early January right at the height of flu season in addition to the arm/shoulder. You can go but not be 100% with these things. I'm not a gambler so I'm glad the Kings play it coy reporting minor injuries or waiting until the last minute to announce a player is returning or unexpectedly out.As other posters have pointed out, Fox has clutched his right arm/shoulder in pain during several games this month.
maybe by playing out his current contract and signing with the other klutch players on the lakers?
monte may be forced to trade him (although this time, he'll get value).
wutbelow is my post from last week (cut/paste from page 3)...
NOBODY thinks that this is about the money (and fox's potential future in sac)?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i understand that there were previous "fox" threads, so, maybe this was addressed in the offseason (when it happened)
but, isn't anyone worried that fox is pricing himself out of sacramento?.
i refer to the team's offer in the offseason to add two more years to his deal (getting it matched up with sabonis) at a little over $50 million per year.
fox declined the (what i consider a "fair" number) offer choosing to bet on himself - if he again makes an all-nba team, he becomes eligible for $60 million plus for four years. (super max deal, similar to what bradley beal .has - which led to his trade).
initially, it seemed like a good bet, by fox since ja would not play enough games to qualify.
but looking at his recent play, i think he is going to lose that bet.
and how does he respond?
maybe by playing out his current contract and signing with the other klutch players on the lakers?
monte may be forced to trade him (although this time, he'll get value).
it really depends on whether keegan is a major player on this team (or not).
Reply
R
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reminds me of Happy Gilmore. "Uh oh, Happy learned to put!"