I like this position. I see a lot of hand-wringing about IF this is worse case scenario and the injuries are severe but at this stage who knows. If it is, you throw the book at him and the team has to deal with it. And like-wise, if it turns out to be a over-exaggerated brouhaha over nothing, you deal with the appropriate level of response. I'll let the facts come out before getting the pitchforks out.I am extremely disappointed by this. I am hoping it was an aberration, a one off (perhaps a night of celebration on Memorial week end that got a bit out of control, with blame on both sides) Regardless of the NBA, or the Kings stance on this, I can not, and will not, condone violence against women or children. I hope this plays out as an over exaggerated brouhaha over nothing
I shall wait until all the facts have come out. Sometimes these things are overblown, and sometimes not. I hope it's something that just got out of control by both parties. It should be interesting to see if she presses charges now that there's been a cooling off period. I hope for the Kings and Collisons sake that it's not as serious as it appears.
I in general agree and I would would caution anyone not to rush to judgment.I will add however that the real world does not and should not demand the level of proof that a court of law does. Just as an example there came a point in the Ray Rice case that I and most people were very comfortable with calling his behaviors unacceptable and that they should not be tolerated by the league. His guilt or innocence in court was at that point academic to the leagues responsibility to do the right thing.
To clarify I was not arguing that the Kings org nor the NBA should act without a conviction or admission of guilt, I only meant that as fans and members of the public we do not need that strict level of certainty. BUT I was also speaking in the context of DEFENDING the idea that judgment on all sides should be with held until more is known. I truly hope that DC would never hit any defenseless person. I have every intention of taking a wait and see attitude before even discussing this situation much further than I already have. But in the end, as a relatively competent adult I reserve the right to make up my own mind about what likely has occurred regardless of what court verdicts may or may not say.Well ... it depends ... yes, in certain, obvious situations, NBA and the Kings should not wait a year to suspend him. HOWEVER, for every Ray Rice, we have Simeon Varlamov. The dude was arrested, booed and verbally insulted in every arena for months. People demanded to deport him. He stayed cool though, refused to pay "the victim" and when things cleared in the court we all realized what the BS this case was from the very beginning, even though he was obviously guilty for the real world all that time. I am not saying that DC is innocent but we should not crucify him just yet.
Can we not jump to conclusions for once. I need details.
Can we not jump to conclusions for once. I need details.
Confirmed to be Collisons wife: as per yahoo sports report -
Police received a call from a woman — Collison's wife, per CBS13 — who said she was being assaulted, and when they arrived on scene around 1 a.m. on Wednesday morning, they witnessed visible injuries on the woman, Placer County Sheriff's Office told KCRA-TV.
Not sounding good at all!Confirmed to be Collisons wife: as per yahoo sports report -
Police received a call from a woman — Collison's wife, per CBS13 — who said she was being assaulted, and when they arrived on scene around 1 a.m. on Wednesday morning, they witnessed visible injuries on the woman, Placer County Sheriff's Office told KCRA-TV.
Not sounding good at all!
There are two sections that can be used in domestic violence crimes: The felony section - 273.5(a) or the misdemeanor section - 243(e)(1). If a injury is visible, no matter how slight (from slight redness to full-on lacerations/bruises/etc), the felony section is applied. If an accusation is made and there are no visible injuries, the misdemeanor section is used. One thing to note, is that in domestic violence accusations, the 836PC section states the officer SHALL make an arrest in these circumstances. It's one of the only sections that mandates an officer make an arrest when it is warranted.
It's nothing more than a confirmation of who the woman is. The stuff about the "visible injuries" has been known since he was first arrested.
Again, I caution people not to jump to conclusions. There are just too few things we know and way too many we don't.
this is true.
what concerns me is Placer County Sheriff's Office being the source of the visible injuries quote.
She could just have scratches. Like seriously people, let's not act like he murdered someone. People argue. Couples argue.
She could just have scratches. Like seriously people, let's not act like he murdered someone. People argue. Couples argue.
Wow. Really?
AgreedShe could just have scratches. Like seriously people, let's not act like he murdered someone. People argue. Couples argue.
Yes...? I don't know what you're needing confirmation for. It was typed, that is what was said. Yes, really.Wow. Really?
Yes...? I don't know what you're needing confirmation for. It was typed, that is what was said. Yes, really.