aww man someone give Rondae a job!
Also how long will he stay “in shape”?
I honestly don't know what is more hilarious.
Don't forget the part about how it's all running on the backbone of code that was written by the worst people.I cannot express how excited I am for a future utterly polluted by junk information, junk images, and junk video, all constructed under the guise of "technological progress"...
"Made enough money to buy MiamiNearly 110 million in career earnings.
Nearly 110 million in career earnings.
ironic? no Karma yes.Fox moving to Canada? That would be ironic with its high taxes considering one reason wanted out of high state income tax Cali was Texas having no state income tax.
![]()
Spurs could acquire $224 million superstar, cut ties with Wembanyama's new star guard
The San Antonio Spurs had the second overall pick in the 2024 draft fall into their lap; now they might be looking to go all in with this blockbuster hypothetical trade.www.yahoo.com
The billionaire owners of tech companies "write code" in the same sense in that they "play basketball" through owning NBA teams.Don't forget the part about how it's all running on the backbone of code that was written by the worst people.
…future?I cannot express how excited I am for a future utterly polluted by junk information, junk images, and junk video, all constructed under the guise of "technological progress", but with the ultimate intent to sell me junk I don't need. We truly live in the Dumbest Timeline™.
All of the above. You didn't think that the programmers were all value-neutral people, or that their code wasn't informed by their own biases, did you?The billionaire owners of tech companies "write code" in the same sense in that they "play basketball" through owning NBA teams.
Or did you actually mean the software engineers at these companies were the "worst people"?
Ok, thanks for clarifying. Some owners like to portray themselves as if the company depends on their work directing details of implementation, I wasn't sure if this idea was convincing.All of the above. You didn't think that the programmers were all value-neutral people, or that their code wasn't informed by their own biases, did you?
The people signing the checks ultimately have the final say, but the programmers are complicit.
While I don’t want to truly jump into this discussion, I will flag that I think the word ‘code’ in this context is a bit of a misnomer (as is ‘programmer’). It’s the training of the underlying model that is in question; in which case, IMO, ‘value’ is likely inescapable, and honestly, the one thing an owner could explicitly direct implementation details upon.Ok, thanks for clarifying. Some owners like to portray themselves as if the company depends on their work directing details of implementation, I wasn't sure if this idea was convincing.
I think you'd have a hard time finding a value that the programmers at these companies all have in common (maybe ambition.) Coding is not an expression of someone's value system, it's pretty close to a purely functional activity. Is scoring points for the Lakers of a different moral value than scoring points for the Jazz?
Do you think programmers are more complicit than anyone else who works for a billionaire?
They don't have to have it "in common."I think you'd have a hard time finding a value that the programmers at these companies all have in common (maybe ambition.)
The hell it ain't. Unconscious bias is a real thing (e.g. the soap dispensers that wouldn't work on darker-skinned people, because the engineers didn't foresee the problem of the LED not triggering for darker pigmentations because, in turn, it never even occurred to them that it was a problem worthy of consideration, because it wasn't something that they would ever have to deal with).Coding is not an expression of someone's value system, it's pretty close to a purely functional activity.
Do you think programmers are more complicit than anyone else who works for a billionaire?
I think when it comes to the "backbone of code" that runs the training, which is what Slim originally referred to, this terminology is appropriate. The processes that train LLMs are implemented by "programmers" as "code".While I don’t want to truly jump into this discussion, I will flag that I think the word ‘code’ in this context is a bit of a misnomer (as is ‘programmer’). It’s the training of the underlying model that is in question; in which case, IMO, ‘value’ is likely inescapable, and honestly, the one thing an owner could explicitly direct implementation details upon.
Why label a group of people collectively as the worst if they don't have any values in common?They don't have to have it "in common."
I accept that unconscious bias is a real thing. I'm skeptical that the soap dispenser is an example of engineers expressing their unconscious bias. Where's the root cause analysis? Who's the engineer? It's hard to even find the company that made the dispenser.The hell it ain't. Unconscious bias is a real thing (e.g. the soap dispensers that wouldn't work on darker-skinned people, because the engineers didn't foresee the problem of the LED not triggering for darker pigmentations because, in turn, it never even occurred to them that it was a problem worthy of consideration, because it wasn't something that they would ever have to deal with).
LLMs (and AI/Machine Learning systems in general) are inherently biased, they pick words randomly from a distribution that is arbitrary. To Sluggah's point above, the impact that the programmers coding the training infrastructure have over how that is biased, is about nil. Probably couldn't affect it even if they wanted to.I think that the people who code the algorithms which influence/determine how information is aggregated and disseminated to end users are orders of magnitude more complicit than the guy who files the payroll reports, yeah.