The Clippers can keep Livingston, as far as I'm concerned. He's great against the Kings, as every point guard is, but he's just not that good. But all the same, seriously smills91, if the Clippers aren't going to trade Livingston for Allen freaking Iverson why would they trade him for Ron Artest?? They're not even getting a point guard back from the Kings in your proposals (and no, Jason Hart does not count)
The absolute best case scenario is Maggette and two first rounders, and that's still a reach, in my opinion. Maggette and a first is probably the most realistic positive scenario for the Kings, and given Ron's injuries and mercurial attitude this season I don't think the Kings' bargaining position is great, even if the Clippers are coming to the Kings and not the other way around.
The absolute best case scenario is Maggette and two first rounders, and that's still a reach, in my opinion. Maggette and a first is probably the most realistic positive scenario for the Kings, and given Ron's injuries and mercurial attitude this season I don't think the Kings' bargaining position is great, even if the Clippers are coming to the Kings and not the other way around.
Becasue Artest fills their true need, he's only 26 years old, he hasn't demanded a trade and makes only 8 million a year instead of 17 million a year.
Iverson has JUST as much if not more baggage than Artest which nullifies that argument.
If it's Maggette and 2 first rounders I might consider, but I would just assume KEEP Artest at that price. The key here is the Clippers are trying to PRY artest loose. The Kings aren't shopping him. If we're moving him to a divisional rival to beat us down over the next 7 years, then we better get fair value for him or I say keep him and IF, IF he implodes then we get maggette at a later date.