Chris Bosh

Bosh is a bit overrated IMHO.

Allstar player for sure...But far short of superstar. I wouldnt even put him in the top tier of players in the league (although he's definately one of the first guys in the next group down).
 
Bass, Darko and Wilcox get Limited minutes. Bosh gets 40 minutes...and he does dominate sometimes. As for signing lesser talent and saving money...like poker...you are going to have to gamble sooner or later. to even attempt to aquire Bosh would be a gamble, and the odds don't look to good. He eats up cap, and has nothing prime about his game other then his size. Bass would be picked 88th, Darko 89th, and Wilcox 90th. Bosh goes at 11-15.Maybe 10th
Lebron
Kobe
KG
Pierce
Ming
Durant
Amare
Gasol
Melo
Wade
Nash
Dirk
Shaq
BOSH

BOSH BEHIND SHAQ???? err is it just me or is this 2008? And did you just say that a guy who just finished his rookie season is better and worth more than Dwyane Wade?

Kingzrool I couldn't agree more, FakeInjury never ceases to amaze me
 
Bass, Darko and Wilcox get Limited minutes. Bosh gets 40 minutes...and he does dominate sometimes. As for signing lesser talent and saving money...like poker...you are going to have to gamble sooner or later. to even attempt to aquire Bosh would be a gamble, and the odds don't look to good. He eats up cap, and has nothing prime about his game other then his size. Bass would be picked 88th, Darko 89th, and Wilcox 90th. Bosh goes at 11-15.Maybe 10th
Lebron
Kobe
KG
Pierce
Ming
Durant
Amare
Gasol
Melo
Wade
Nash
Dirk
Shaq
BOSH

I think that Bosh will be a little futher up that list. Shaq might not even play past 2010. Nash, as much as I love him will be two years older, and only God knows how he will be playing by then. There's no way I would put Durant ahead of Bosh at this point in time. Durant hasn't proved anything yet. Bosh is 23 years old and will be 25 in the summer of 2010. So he has youth on his side.

I think its a little early to be deciding who we should prusue that summer. Thompson may be averaging 15 and 9 by then. He's also young and probably more skilled than Bosh was coming into the league. Doesn't mean he'll be as good as Bosh, but it doesn't mean he won't either. My one reservation on Bosh is that he hasn't made a dramatic improvement in the last three years. I'm not saying that he's as good as he's going to be, but that maybe the ceiling isn't that far away. Could be is all he needs is a change of scenery.

As far as leaving Toronto. I think he will bolt for another destination. Most players dont' like the tax situation in Canada. Especially because, I think they get taxed twice. I'm not sure of this, but maybe Bricky can help me out on that one. All I know is that historicaly, players have left when they have had the chance.

One final note. Even if Thompson is averaging 20 and 10, and Hawes is averaging 15 and 9 (wishful thinking) and you can get Bosh to come here, I say you go and get him. What a three man rotation that would be. I have to stop. I'm getting giddy.:p
 
One final note. Even if Thompson is averaging 20 and 10, and Hawes is averaging 15 and 9 (wishful thinking) and you can get Bosh to come here, I say you go and get him. What a three man rotation that would be. I have to stop. I'm getting giddy.:p

That's going to be one pricey three-man rotation. If our guys are putting up those numbers, they're going to get deals similar to Amare and Bogut, and throw in a max deal to lure away Bosh and we'll have to fill the rest of the roster with D-Leaguers. ;)
 
Hawes doesn't need to do much, and he will get 40 million/6yrs offer sometime in the future. If he performs well enough to put Sacramento in the playoff race, the sky is the limit. Hawes probably knows that this year will make or break his future on this team. With SAR looking at limited minutes, and Miller's game slowly translating away from the ideal, and two rookie fowards; to me, it looks like Hawes will need to step up or be shipped out. If Thompson has just an inkling of talent and muscles Hawes out of the starting lineup, then things don't look so good. Hawes has alot of upside, and if he shows off his moves against premiere centers and wins the matchup, its going to get interesting. But for now, hes still in his very early 20's, and it is going to be unfair to expect more from him, than from Thompson(24). But, that is the way things are, not fair. And Hawes has had his year off as a rookie. Now its time for him to show Sac. that he is the starting star center for this team. If he doesn't, Mikki/Miller, im sure will fair fine. But Hawes/Thomson just seems like an experiment worth trying.
 
Hawes doesn't need to do much, and he will get 40 million/6yrs offer sometime in the future. If he performs well enough to put Sacramento in the playoff race, the sky is the limit. Hawes probably knows that this year will make or break his future on this team. With SAR looking at limited minutes, and Miller's game slowly translating away from the ideal, and two rookie fowards; to me, it looks like Hawes will need to step up or be shipped out. If Thompson has just an inkling of talent and muscles Hawes out of the starting lineup, then things don't look so good. Hawes has alot of upside, and if he shows off his moves against premiere centers and wins the matchup, its going to get interesting. But for now, hes still in his very early 20's, and it is going to be unfair to expect more from him, than from Thompson(24). But, that is the way things are, not fair. And Hawes has had his year off as a rookie. Now its time for him to show Sac. that he is the starting star center for this team. If he doesn't, Mikki/Miller, im sure will fair fine. But Hawes/Thomson just seems like an experiment worth trying.

What's with the urgency? Hawes doesn't have to do anything besides show decent progress next year.
 
Hawes probably knows that this year will make or break his future on this team. With SAR looking at limited minutes, and Miller's game slowly translating away from the ideal, and two rookie fowards; to me, it looks like Hawes will need to step up or be shipped out. If Thompson has just an inkling of talent and muscles Hawes out of the starting lineup, then things don't look so good.
If there is one thing I have learned watching the NBA the past 30 yrs or so, it's that you don't rush the development of a center. I have seen way too many players given up on after 2 - 3 years, only to see them become star players at the center position. Hawes is entering his 2nd season, after playing his first season with a bad knee for the first half. Obviously, I want him to have a break out year. However, a solid season with marked improvement is what I expect.

Thompson is a PF, not a center. Yes, he can play the position at times, but that is not his strength. My biggest goal for him this season is for him to knock Mikki Moore out of the starting lineup before the season is over.
 
That's going to be one pricey three-man rotation. If our guys are putting up those numbers, they're going to get deals similar to Amare and Bogut, and throw in a max deal to lure away Bosh and we'll have to fill the rest of the roster with D-Leaguers. ;)

Go ahead and pop my balloon. :rolleyes:
 
Seriously, never.

I am usually the one with ambiguous posts. I am just going to assume that you don't agree that centers and power fowards are one and the same. I think they are, because small ball is being played by 1/3 of the NBA. For every Kaman, Dalambert, and Shaq there is KG, Ben Wallace, and....CHRIS BOSH. All 6 aformentioned players play......CENTER. Albeit, not all the time. But, in the NBA, it is a special player who plays multiple positions. And those players are going to be the target of NBA teams in the future. Lebron could play all 5 postions, and I honestly beleive he should. So. along that line of though, the center position is being marginalized by players like Lebron who can make the game look easy from any position. I agree, that history indicates winning a championship requires a real presence down low(SHAQ, DUNCAN, KG, RASHEED). But all it takes is one team to win a champioship without a traditional center, and all bets are off, small ball to wall.
 
But all it takes is one team to win a champioship without a traditional center, and all bets are off, small ball to wall.

So hopes Nellie, anyway. And please let me know when we'll see LeBron play the 5. I'll be watching.

Since the goal is to win an NBA championship, it seems absurd to put players in a position that will lead the team to, ultimately, failure.
 
Hawes doesn't need to do much, and he will get 40 million/6yrs offer sometime in the future. If he performs well enough to put Sacramento in the playoff race, the sky is the limit. Hawes probably knows that this year will make or break his future on this team. With SAR looking at limited minutes, and Miller's game slowly translating away from the ideal, and two rookie fowards; to me, it looks like Hawes will need to step up or be shipped out. If Thompson has just an inkling of talent and muscles Hawes out of the starting lineup, then things don't look so good. Hawes has alot of upside, and if he shows off his moves against premiere centers and wins the matchup, its going to get interesting. But for now, hes still in his very early 20's, and it is going to be unfair to expect more from him, than from Thompson(24). But, that is the way things are, not fair. And Hawes has had his year off as a rookie. Now its time for him to show Sac. that he is the starting star center for this team. If he doesn't, Mikki/Miller, im sure will fair fine. But Hawes/Thomson just seems like an experiment worth trying.

This is the statement that I disagree with. Your argument of merging positions is not good enough to change my mind. And sorry for the ambiguity, it was an extension of my earlier reply in this thread, "You never cease to amaze me". You have Thompson edging out Hawes for a position that he does not really play, and back it with a sweeping and questionable generalization.
 
Just because Hawes says he's a center, doesn't mean he is one. And just because you think Hunter S. Thompson is a PF doesn't mean he is one either. As a matter of opinion, I think Hunters thompson is a C/PF and Hawes is a PF/C.
 
Just because Hawes says he's a center, doesn't mean he is one. And just because you think Hunter S. Thompson is a PF doesn't mean he is one either. As a matter of opinion, I think Hunters thompson is a C/PF and Hawes is a PF/C.

What part of Thompson's skill set leads you to believe he is a C/PF, and Hawes is PF/C? I'm curious.
 
Hawes is 6-11. I hope we can agree on that. His skill set is as follows; decent dribbler, and crafty bigman. Im not sure about his passing, so ill reserve my judgement on that skill for later. Either way, he reminds me of Chris Webber(PF). Jason is just a great rebounder, and rebounding is a fundamental skill needed to play C. I hope that explains my reasoning.
 
Hawes is 6-11. I hope we can agree on that. His skill set is as follows; decent dribbler, and crafty bigman. Im not sure about his passing, so ill reserve my judgement on that skill for later. Either way, he reminds me of Chris Webber(PF). Jason is just a great rebounder, and rebounding is a fundamental skill needed to play C. I hope that explains my reasoning.

Actually, no. Hawes is a legit 7 footer, who is still growing. His skill set says nothing about traditional PF skills. He has great hands around the basket.

Thompson was a good rebounder in college. Being a good rebounder alone does not make you a center. If so, Barkley would have gone down as one of the greatest centers of all time.

If you do a little homework on Thompson, you'll notice that his offense skill puts him in a position to be in more of the Webber role you're thinking of. Decent outside, great on the break. Certainly not a guy you'd want to put in a "traditional" center role.
 
There comes a point in every man's life when he realises that arguing with certain people is just pointless and at times serves only to degrade your intelligence...
 
There comes a point in every man's life when he realises that arguing with certain people is just pointless and at times serves only to degrade your intelligence...

I have been known to use the quote "Never argue with an idiot, they will just drag you down to their level and beat you from experience".
 
I have been known to use the quote "Never argue with an idiot, they will just drag you down to their level and beat you from experience".

Sweet catch phrazes. Pozers for psych mayors, shrinking me, like i need it. and i do. To comment on Hawes some more, i do not agree he is 7ft. I'll admitt he might say he is, but we all know that NBA players over state their height 60% of the time. And we all know its not how big you actually are, but how big you play....WHO do you think plays bigger, Thompson vs. hawes
 
Sweet catch phrazes. Pozers for psych mayors, shrinking me, like i need it. and i do. To comment on Hawes some more, i do not agree he is 7ft. I'll admitt he might say he is, but we all know that NBA players over state their height 60% of the time. And we all know its not how big you actually are, but how big you play....WHO do you think plays bigger, Thompson vs. hawes
dean_venture.jpg


I DARE you to make less sense.
 
Just because Hawes says he's a center, doesn't mean he is one. And just because you think Hunter S. Thompson is a PF doesn't mean he is one either. As a matter of opinion, I think Hunters thompson is a C/PF and Hawes is a PF/C.

After watching the Las Vegas Summer League, I'm filled with fear and loathing of Hunter S. Thompson whatever position he plays.
 
Wishful thinking.

It would really be nice to have Bosh in our team. It will give us a solid PF while we wait for Jason Thompson to develop and mature.

I think a solid PF is the only player that is missing in this rebuilding team.

We are pretty much set at #1 with decent PG's on Udrih, Bjax, and BBrown. To me these players are more than enough to compensate for the loss of Bibby.

We are solid on #2 on Martin, especially with a decent back-up in the name of Garcia and Salmons.

I also believe we are pretty much set on #3. At 6' 10" , Greene is a very promising SF - especially that he is very mobile/atheletic and can shoot the treys. He reminds me of Peja and Hedo.

We are also pretty much set at #5 with Miller ( a potential double-double every night with some bonus on assists ) and the youthful Hawes who have shown a lot of promise last season.

Now, if we could just have a reliable PF franchise player who can bring in a double-double ( game-after-game ), and who can give the Kings the needed confidence and identity, I think we could talk about play-offs next season, and Championship in 2-3 years.


I respectfully disagree...

First off we are not set on any position besides the 2. Beno would be a nice BACKUP but imo he is just filling in until a player can fill that role, thats why the kings drafted Sean Singletary and brought in Bobby Brown and B-Jax.

I do however see promise in the 3 spot with Salmons and greene however I cant call it being set by any means at this point.

Furtheremore the jury is still out on Hawes but he does show an upside thats undeniable considering the guy is only 20 but bottom line is to be truly effective at the 5 i feel he should needs to add strength.

Adding Chris Bosh to the team might just be the right move to pull off because it would add so much versatility to the team with Thompson backing both Bosh and Spencer (or spencer backing Jason). Then adding a point would be the last peice of the puzzle.
 
I am usually the one with ambiguous posts. I am just going to assume that you don't agree that centers and power fowards are one and the same. I think they are, because small ball is being played by 1/3 of the NBA. For every Kaman, Dalambert, and Shaq there is KG, Ben Wallace, and....CHRIS BOSH. All 6 aformentioned players play......CENTER. Albeit, not all the time. But, in the NBA, it is a special player who plays multiple positions. And those players are going to be the target of NBA teams in the future. Lebron could play all 5 postions, and I honestly beleive he should. So. along that line of though, the center position is being marginalized by players like Lebron who can make the game look easy from any position. I agree, that history indicates winning a championship requires a real presence down low(SHAQ, DUNCAN, KG, RASHEED). But all it takes is one team to win a champioship without a traditional center, and all bets are off, small ball to wall.

Post #1000! And all I have to say is.....LeBron at C? Wow.
 
Had to jump in here. FakeInjury, your premise makes no sense whatsoever, and now I'm wondering if you have ever really seen these guys play at all. Hawes = 7ft. I met the guy, this isn't really debatable. He is a center who hopefully can develop into a sort of Chris Kaman type. (Ultimately I'm hoping Kevin McHale.) Thompson is a 6' 11" PF with a skillset to match. I hope this explains your (un)reasoning.
 
Back
Top