Bucks GM on Ramon Sessions and Joe Alexander

sidney

Starter
http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/43301302.html

Interesting in regards to a couple guys that have been talked about here in trades / FA signings:

Bucks general manager John Hammond fielded a few questions from the media at a season-ending gathering Monday at the Bradley Center.
He had a number of interesting things to say, indicating that no one in the organization could be happy with team's recently completed 34-48 season.
And Hammond did not downplay the importance of the June draft. The Bucks have the No. 10 slot in the draft lottery and an 87% chance of staying in that position for the June 25 draft. They also have their own second-round pick, the 41st overall selection.
Hammond said he and his staff - including assistant general manager Jeff Weltman, director of player personnel Dave Babcock and scouting director Billy McKinney - will have a better feel for the team's needs now that they have worked together in Milwaukee for a year.
"We'll get someone good there," Hammond said of the 10th spot. "I think we'll do a better job in this draft. Having Scott Skiles as our coach now for a year, I think he knows more about us; we know more about him even.
"We want him to be a part of this process. It's a player we want him to like, along with us. It's a player that needs to be on the floor and helping us to win games next year."
Hammond spoke about his first draft with the Bucks last June, which brought forward Joe Alexander with the eighth overall pick and forward Luc Richard Mbah a Moute at No. 37. Mbah a Moute made a major contribution to the team, while Alexander struggled to get playing time.
"We appreciate what Luc Mbah a Moute did; he had a great year for us," Hammond said. "Joe Alexander has to get better. It was a little difficult for us with the Joe situation. We drafted Joe, and we knew he was very raw as a player.
"We knew we were going to have patience in dealing with him. When injuries occurred, we needed him to step up and play a little bit better, earlier than we thought. We became a little bit impatient with him.
"A guy like Joe has a little bit of a obsessive-compulsive personality, and he works so hard. There's more self-inflicted pressure on him; he wants it so bad. We have to get more out of our first-round pick this year than we did out of Joe this season."
Hammond said the Bucks would explore all avenues to improve the team, but he stressed that the team's payroll position would limit flexibility in the near term and that he did not want to hurt the franchise's position for the long term.
"It will be very important to have discipline as we move forward," Hammond said. "In a couple years we could have some very significant (financial) relief, and we want to be in position where we can be that kind of team.
"We like our team, but we do not like the fact that we have very little flexibility. We’re restricted in what we can do this summer in adding players to our roster and how we can add them. When we get the reins off of us in that regard, we want to keep them off."
He repeated that he hoped to be able to re-sign restricted free agents Charlie Villanueva and Ramon Sessions but said it would be difficult. And Hammond expressed confidence that injured regulars Andrew Bogut and Michael Redd would be able to return at full strength for next season.
"With Redd, Bogut and (Richard) Jefferson, with that three-pronged attack, those guys can win games," Hammond said.
 
It's a shame that Joe Alexander hasn't found success yet...he almost appears to be a bust. I was really, really high on this guy near the draft last year...but more and more he's looking like a "workout wonder." Still think there's a good shot for him to be successful, though - but it appears as of now that the Bucks reached with this pick.
 
It's a shame that Joe Alexander hasn't found success yet...he almost appears to be a bust. I was really, really high on this guy near the draft last year...but more and more he's looking like a "workout wonder." Still think there's a good shot for him to be successful, though - but it appears as of now that the Bucks reached with this pick.

Thank God he didn't get anywhere close to us... i remember how alot of us wanted him to drop to us, even me at times. I'm sorry to Jason for being totally bummed out when we picked him because I thought we wasted a pick, and I'm glad I couldn't be any more wrong...
 
It's a shame that Joe Alexander hasn't found success yet...he almost appears to be a bust. I was really, really high on this guy near the draft last year...but more and more he's looking like a "workout wonder." Still think there's a good shot for him to be successful, though - but it appears as of now that the Bucks reached with this pick.

I don't think he's been totally terrible--he picked it up somewhat towards the end of the season--but his game features way too much one-on-one, because he's not particularly adept at the catch and shoot and he likes to feature his athleticism. But the problem is he doesn't have the ballhandling ability to lead to successful ventures on his forays to the rim all the time. He's starting to play off the ball better, but he needs to improve either his shooting ability or his ballhandling ability, or both really, to become a consistent offensive player. He's not realy a good passer or rebounder either to make up for that deficiency, he's extremely turnover prone, and he plays nondescript defense, but between all that, it's hard to see great skill potential for the future, and explains why he's currently a net negative. Hard worker yes, but it needs to show on the court.

But the reason he was drafted that way in the first place was the sheer athleticism--not really a tangible skill, just a physical trait that many have in the league so it isn't really enough as a staying power for many players.

Suffice to say he's not really the type of player we need.
 
I don't think he's been totally terrible--he picked it up somewhat towards the end of the season--but his game features way too much one-on-one, because he's not particularly adept at the catch and shoot and he likes to feature his athleticism. But the problem is he doesn't have the ballhandling ability to lead to successful ventures on his forays to the rim all the time. He's starting to play off the ball better, but he needs to improve either his shooting ability or his ballhandling ability, or both really, to become a consistent offensive player. He's not realy a good passer or rebounder either to make up for that deficiency, he's extremely turnover prone, and he plays nondescript defense, but between all that, it's hard to see great skill potential for the future, and explains why he's currently a net negative. Hard worker yes, but it needs to show on the court.

But the reason he was drafted that way in the first place was the sheer athleticism--not really a tangible skill, just a physical trait that many have in the league so it isn't really enough as a staying power for many players.

Suffice to say he's not really the type of player we need.

However, Ramon Sessions is...
 
Yes on Sessions. I know the Bucks' hands are tied in that situation, but I didn't expect them to blatantly say that it would be difficult to resign either Villanueva or Sessions. But putting on my GM hat, the choice should be easy for them--resign Sessions. I have a funny feeling that Villanueva's season is a fluke season offensively, given his often lackadaisical attitude--but even if it's not, he's only proven for the most part to be a good scorer, but little else. And besides, you still have Jefferson, another bonafide scorer. I actually thought that Sessions elevated their paltry win total--he's the orchestrator behind that offense, racking up most of the assists, and if they lose him, they only have Luke Ridnour (who should be a career backup) to show for it. So despite what the GM says, I expect them to really fight to have Sessions back on the team. But if not, I wouldn't mind taking him on this team--he's the playmaker we need, is young enough to command that position for the next 5-6 years, and he has a certain toughness to him that I like.
 
Expect the Bucks to draft one of the many guards available in this draft and explore Sessions value on a S&T...
Or let him walk. The POINT of letting go of Sessions is to avoid the salary he'd command on the open market. They're already at the lux tax threshold.
 
Expect the Bucks to draft one of the many guards available in this draft and explore Sessions value on a S&T...

A S&T would be pointless for the Bucks. If they're going to take on salary, they'd just sign Sessions outright.

The talk of it being "difficult" to sign Sessions (and Villanueva) is just talk. They're just playing thrifty for negotiating purposes.

If you listen to what they're saying about Alexander, and getting more out of this years draft pick, that means they want someone who can contribute right away. Who better to contribute than your own pg.
 
unless they can include one of their long term contracts in there as well for an expiring contract.... is that even possible?
 
The Bucks will have serious cap issues if they sign either Charlie V. or Sessions unless some under the cap team like the Kings will offer to accept some trades which to give them maybe 6M space. The will most likely keep Charlie as they don't have any legit big other than Bogut. PG-wise they have Ridnour(expiring and will most likely be traded) and Bell.

With this, I'll openly agree if they can send Dan Gadzuric to us. I think he will be a good backup C to Hawes. Then we can give them back 1 PG from this PG loaded draft through either our Houston or 31st pick.

Maybe even a Nocioni/Udrih/Diogu(S&T)/31st pick for Jefferson/Gadzuric may get the Bucks excited.
 
Back
Top