SacTownKid
Hall of Famer
Don't worry. Another random warriors assistant coach will turn this thing around.
Oh and pace!
This alone gives me every reason to root for Alvin Gentry. Mike Brown? Give me a ****ing break.
Don't worry. Another random warriors assistant coach will turn this thing around.
Oh and pace!
Well, Memphis hit on a #2 and a #4 pick so I'm not sure they qualify. The others are good examples I think the Jazz didn't really retool so much as never get all that bad while hitting on Gobert and Mitchell. Denver hitting on Jokic was the key for them.
Well, Memphis hit on a #2 and a #4 pick so I'm not sure they qualify. The others are good examples I think the Jazz didn't really retool so much as never get all that bad while hitting on Gobert and Mitchell. Denver hitting on Jokic was the key for them.
But even Memphis. Recognizing Desmond Bane as late 1st. They aren't playing Brandon Clarke for whatever reason, but he's a absolutely a good NBA player. Dillion Brooks been a a multi-year starter as a 2nd round pick. Grabbing Melton off the scrap heap from Houston and he's developed into a starting-caliber player. Investing in quality young players like Kyle Anderson (signed his deal at 25) and Tyus Jones (signed at 23).
So while they drafted and hit on their 2 and 4 pick, they've clearly recognized they have to win in the draft in order to compete with the bigger markets. Something Sac could clearly learn from.
Yeah those picks are what do it. A while back I went thru the playoff teams from last year and was surprised by how uniformly they were led by guys who went 1-3. Even Celtics I would think of like that but Brown and Taytum both went at 3. Luka technically was even 3. You get situations like Bron and Davis both being #1s competing on new teams, but the league is run overwhelmingly by guys who went in the first 3.
Should be noted that our last two “playoff push” teams were led by guys who went 5.
But even Memphis. Recognizing Desmond Bane as late 1st. They aren't playing Brandon Clarke for whatever reason, but he's a absolutely a good NBA player. Dillion Brooks been a a multi-year starter as a 2nd round pick. Grabbing Melton off the scrap heap from Houston and he's developed into a starting-caliber player. Investing in quality young players like Kyle Anderson (signed his deal at 25) and Tyus Jones (signed at 23).
So while they drafted and hit on their 2 and 4 pick, they've clearly recognized they have to win in the draft in order to compete with the bigger markets. Something Sac could clearly learn from.
The Sixers were a #1 seed last year. The Kings are about to set a record for futility in terms of consecutive seasons missing the playoffs.
But let's flip the conversation around. Can you name a mediocre, end of the lottery small market team that rebuilt on the fly and became a perennial playoff contender? I'm asking legitimately. Because the only one that comes to mind for me is the 1999 Sacramento Kings.
But unless Monte makes a Richmond for Webber level deal for Fox, signs a Vlade level talent in free agency and drafts two mid and late lottery rookies the level of JWill and Peja (who was actually drafted in 96 of course) I don't know that he can replicate that type of turnaround.
I can name a LOT of franchises that were turned around by one or more top 3 or top 5 draft picks. I can literally only think of that Kings team as one that became a legit contender by retooling a mediocre roster. I suppose you could name the Suns with CP3 but Ayton (though not the main driver) was a #1 overall pick. Can you think of a team that went from where this Kings team is now to a perennial playoff team or even a champion?
Not sure but the Hawks had quite the turnaround last year with a simple coach firing. Not saying that's the case here but that was interesting to see
I’m dying. Well done sir.I'll just fill out the rest of the responses for you guys so we don't have to waste our time rehashing the same old arguments....
Kings need to tank to get the #1 pick.
Having the worst record doesn't guarantee you the #1 pick.
I know but it gives you the best odds.
They'll just pick a bust with it anyway.
They've got to get lucky at some point and pick an all star.
Having an all star doesn't guarantee you a playoff berth.
I know but it's better than not having an all star.
TANKING IS DISRESPECTFUL TO THE FANS AND THE GAME!!!
Would you rather finish as the 11th seed and pick 10th in the draft again?
CJ McCollum was picked 10th.
There are other ways to go about it than losing on purpose.
I don't mean losing on purpose, I mean tanking by developing the younger players and trading the vets.
What do you guys think about this trade proposal?
No way, our players are awesome.
Everything would have been better if they would have just picked Luka.
*mod closes thread*
As long as Vivek picks the coach, it’s always gonna be like this. I’ve finally found my peace with this franchise.This alone gives me every reason to root for Alvin Gentry. Mike Brown? Give me a ****ing break.
I'd trade Mitchell too, and leaning towards keeping Hali but am wondering about his value to a rebuild.
Both of those guys were picks that were meant to help the pre-existing core. Hali was meant to be a complimentary piece to Fox and Mitchell was to help with this group's woeful defensive performance the year before.
But Mitchell is a 23 year old rookie whose offense sucks all kind of butt and I don't really think he's going to end up that good of a player. Hali will probably be the same vein as Lonzo or Mikal Bridges and we need like two better prospects than him to make it worth keeping around the next cycle.
I guess just load up on as many picks and prospects as you possibly can. There are teams in contention or trying to win now that have recent lottery picks buried on their bench.
Guys like Moody, Kuminga, Bouknight, etc,
I don't know what the next move would be other than a major roster change. If we don't make the playoffs this year, then what? Big roster change after that? Seems like delaying the inevitable. Do we think this is a playoff team? If so, is it a playoff team that will progress into a mainstay playoff team? I don't think there is any way that the FO sees that at this point.
I think Vivek did try to get schlenk at the time but he pass on itThe Hawks did a pretty good job of assembling a cohesive team. They had 4 top 10 picks from 2018 to 2020 (Young, Hunter, Reddish, & Okongwu who were taken #5, #4, #10, and #6 respectively) but Trae is the only one that you could say is a star.
But Schlenk did a good job making all the puzzle pieces fit. He also had the cap space to sign Bogdanovic, absorb Gallinari's deal and re-sign John Collins along with smaller deals for Solomon Hill and Kris Dunn. Long term they can't afford everyone but they made a great run last year and can keep enough core pieces to probably be a playoff team for years.
Schlenk was a guy that I thought the Kings might consider before they hired D'Alesandro and was definitely on my short list after PDA was fired.
Schlenk might not have been ready for the big job back in 2012 (I believe he'd only been assistant GM for the Warriors for 1 season at that point) but he's showing he would have likely been far better than Vlade.
Oh well.
Simmons only because that Philly situation ain't improving anytime soon. There would be motivation on both sides though the Kings will likely have to pay.
If it's not Simmons, I'd rather the Kings go after Sabonis.
I agree with the rest of your statement. I'm all for finding pre-break out gems. Monte has been frustrating, but he does have a good eye for talent.
You forgot to add trade for Russell as well. Why not? Would love to see that three headed monster of a teamI think we should keep Fox and trade for KAT and test out the empty stats hypothesis.
Of course. Even if you draft a star in the top 3 you'll end up having them demand a trade in a few years if you don't put pieces around them. 2nd rounders, free agents, GLeague standouts, even late 1sts once your team is too good to pick high.
The Warriors 1st championship team was a bit of an anomaly in that their best two players were drafted #7 & #11 but part of that was hitting on a possible HOF talent in the 2nd in Draymond. But they also went on to add complimentary pieces via trades, free agency, and the draft in Iguodala, Livingston, Barnes etc.
McNair has actually shown a decent ability to acquire complimentary players so far. The issue is the Kings don't have their foundational players. I hoped Fox would take a leap and be one of them but even if he had, they'd need one more star, likely one that makes Fox a solid #2 player at least.
I think that's why a rebuild appeals more now, other than the team being terrible for the 16th season in a row. Because I think we have a competent GM for the first time since Petrie who could actually make it work.
being a competent GM requires more than being a good drafter.
Monte has shown to be a good Drafter so far but you can’t call him great when he has failed to obtain a quality wing.
he has done poorly in pretty much all his trades to date and the roster fit has also been poor. Both of those are important parts of being a competent GM.
Yah this is just his second season. Plus trading for a wing is impossible now cause it’s the most important positionMcNair hasn’t even been here for two years, has he? These posts are so confusing, you’d think he’s been here a significant amount of time.
In my opinion, if you like the player, he's a good player and you feel he still has upside, it doesn't matter in the least that Mitchell is 23 years old. You have older rookies on a cheap rookie contract going into some of their prime years. You draft teenagers for the upside potential, but often need to make a difficult call on their second (BIG) contract while they are still so young and still developing. Of course, if you don't like Mitchell then that's a different story, but I don't think he's scratched the surface of what he will become (and no, I don't believe he'll ever be a superstar or all star).I'd trade Mitchell too, and leaning towards keeping Hali but am wondering about his value to a rebuild.
Both of those guys were picks that were meant to help the pre-existing core. Hali was meant to be a complimentary piece to Fox and Mitchell was to help with this group's woeful defensive performance the year before.
But Mitchell is a 23 year old rookie whose offense sucks all kind of butt and I don't really think he's going to end up that good of a player. Hali will probably be the same vein as Lonzo or Mikal Bridges and we need like two better prospects than him to make it worth keeping around the next cycle.
I guess just load up on as many picks and prospects as you possibly can. There are teams in contention or trying to win now that have recent lottery picks buried on their bench.
Guys like Moody, Kuminga, Bouknight, etc,
McNair actually set this franchise back a decade by retroactively being responsible for Geoff Petrie trading C-Webb for Kenny Thomas and Brian Skinner.McNair hasn’t even been here for two years, has he? These posts are so confusing, you’d think he’s been here a significant amount of time.
Even if he wasn't encouraged by Vivek to try to make it work with Luke or told that a few key assets (Fox) are untouchable I think he's been here 14 or 15 months? He was a late September hire if I remember correctly.It's like some of you just absolutely refuse to acknowledge what a crap-show Vlade left him: $100 mil losing core (if we kept Bogi), and basically a team that was already in their prime. No future 1st rounders, no real intriguing developmental prospects that could maybe spike and help boost the team up.
Vlade left this team in basketball purgatory. It was either blow the whole thing up (which likely ownership would never had allowed his 1st year on the job), or try to win on the fringes with no money, no good draft picks/assets. The hope here is Vivek actually lets McNair rebuild this the way he wants with his coach. If not, and we continue to try to win, my guess is McNair gets 1 year with his coach and if things still stuck in year 3, he's fire in year 4. We're left yet again in a situation where we fire the GM and a coach in year 2 of coaching deal from a previous regime. It's just a damn never ending cycle.
McNair hasn’t even been here for two years, has he? These posts are so confusing, you’d think he’s been here a significant amount of time.
In my opinion, if you like the player, he's a good player and you feel he still has upside, it doesn't matter in the least that Mitchell is 23 years old. You have older rookies on a cheap rookie contract going into some of their prime years. You draft teenagers for the upside potential, but often need to make a difficult call on their second (BIG) contract while they are still so young and still developing. Of course, if you don't like Mitchell then that's a different story, but I don't think he's scratched the surface of what he will become (and no, I don't believe he'll ever be a superstar or all star).