Bill Walton Again?? Not our favorite. Neither for Tom Tolbert back when.....

CruzDude

Senior Member sharing a brew with bajaden
Walton drives us nuts and gets the mute button every time. Way back when, Tom Tolbert was a color guy/ABC Analyst with Walton on NBA games. Skip Bayless worked for the Mercury News back then and wrote the following article for ABC News on June 4, 2003. It's one of our favorites.
*****************************************************
Tolbert ice to Walton's fire
By Skip Bayless
Mercury News

ABC News

Tom Tolbert

The tension might crackle like static on your TV screen. The obvious resentment one ABC analyst has for his new partner might make you a little uncomfortable. Bill Walton's attitude probably will be: Who is this strange person sitting next to me, and why is he getting in my way during the NBA finals?

That person will be Tom Tolbert, whose sudden rise to network stardom makes ``American Idol'' look like a karaoke contest in Des Moines.

``I got lucky,'' Tolbert said.

He got a break even more bizarre than the polka-dot shorts he sometimes wears. NBC had to replace Jayson Williams on the fly after he shot his chauffeur. One man's tragedy became another's opportunity.

But as KNBR listeners know, Tolbert's on-air talent measures up to his luck. He's quick, glib and hip. He has a high basketball and real IQ. That's why he's such an out-of-nowhere threat to Walton, who has re-invented himself as The Most Overstated Analyst in the History of Mankind.

One viewer's opinion: The 6-foot-11 Walton, who won two NCAA championships at UCLA and two NBA titles, with Portland and Boston, looks down literally and figuratively at the 6-8 Tolbert, who won no championships at Arizona or with four NBA teams.

``There could be something to that,'' said Tolbert, more amused than offended. Tolbert doesn't let much bother him, which probably heightens Walton's disdain -- or discomfort.

But allow me to qualify or disqualify myself. I know Tolbert from occasional work I do for KNBR, so perhaps I'm not objective about his talent, or Walton's refusal to acknowledge it and plug into it. It's also possible Tolbert and Walton are one-of-a-kind characters who defy chemistry. Each might be better served by having a conventional former coach for a partner, such as Jeff Van Gundy or Doug Collins.

But 15 years ago, the odds against Walton becoming a network's No. 1 NBA analyst were even longer than Tolbert becoming his partner. Then, I vaguely viewed Walton as a recluse, a former stutterer who had mostly avoided reporters during his playing days. After falling two feet short of becoming the greatest all-around center ever -- two healthy feet -- he was spending the rest of his life in a backyard teepee in San Diego, listening to the Grateful Dead.

Or so I thought. I was shocked when Walton agreed to do weekly March Madness commentary on a radio show I hosted in 1991. I was further surprised by how prepared and outspoken he was.

In the late '90s, I bought the DirecTV package just to hear Walton's not-on-this-planet rants and raves during Los Angeles Clippers broadcasts. Then, I howled when Walton said: ``That was the worst pass any human being has ever thrown.'' Or: ``What was he thinking? That was horrrrible.''

But lately Walton has cried wolf so often that the howls have turned to yawns. Everything is so over-the-top great or bad that Walton's credibility has slipped over the edge.

``I like Bill; I really do,'' Tolbert said. ``But some of the stuff he says is absolutely ludicrous. Everyone knows that.''

Tolbert challenges some of Walton's moon shots, but Tolbert has to pick his spots so his whistle-blowing doesn't interfere with the play-by-play. The theory here is that Tolbert brings out the worst in Walton, whose overstatements camouflage insecurity. While Tolbert wasn't nearly the player Walton was, Walton knows he'll never have Tolbert's gift of gab.

Tolbert is so hang-loose confident that he can come off as cocky. He doesn't pay on-air homage to Walton, who is 13 years older at 50. Oddly enough, growing up a tall basketball player in Southern California, Tolbert didn't idolize Walton.

The one label that gets under Tolbert's skin is that he was an NBA scrub. ``I was better than people think. My first year at Golden State I averaged about five rebounds and nine points in just 19 minutes a game. I started 120 NBA games, the equivalent of a season and half. Relatively, if you can play in the NBA, you're a damn good player.''

Still, Walton sniffs at Tolbert -- during and after telecasts.

``We don't hang out,'' Tolbert said. ``We don't do beers. We don't do wheat-germ shakes. I call it Bill's stealth mode. He materializes when the telecast starts and disappears when it ends.''

Tolbert got his start in broadcasting by calling Jim Rome's radio show while he was with the Clippers in 1993-94. That led to weekly appearances, which led to his daily KNBR show with Ralph Barbieri, which led to some analyst work on Stanford and Cal games, which led to some color commentary on a couple of NBC's NBA games last year.

``Then the Jayson Williams thing happened, and they called and said, `Wanna do the studio show?' There I was with Mike Fratello and Pat Croce, and pretty soon it was just me and Ahmad Rashad, talking hoops.''

And not a single championship ring could Tolbert flash for the camera. So what's the appeal of a bald guy with a goatee who can be more of a kid than his three kids and who owns only two suits, ``one for home, one away''?

Tolbert said: ``I guess they think I appeal to a younger demographic -- maybe 40 and under, because I use lots of pop-culture references from when I was growing up.''

Though he's funnier off the cuff, he has dropped a few planned one-liners on Walton -- without response. ``It's like he didn't even hear me. He just plunges right into his dissertation on how `Dallas' defense is horrrrible.' My goal during the finals is to, just once, make Bill laugh.''

The odds against that are the longest in the history of the world
 
I don't mind Walton every once in a while. Grant and Jerry kind of sugar coat everything so it's nice to have Walton come on every few weeks and just tell it like it is. If we suck, then I'd rather listen to Walton talk about how bad we are than Grant and Jerry talk about how amazing Isaiah Thomas is.
 
I liked Tolbert as an announcer in his early days. Don't know what happened to him. Certainly we are constantly inundated with far bigger idiots.
 
In a perfect world would permanently replace Reynolds. He's humorous, provocative and has made me enjoy Kings games more when he has called them. Due to his notoriety he also commands a national audience on league pass when Kings play
 
In a perfect world would permanently replace Reynolds. He's humorous, provocative and has made me enjoy Kings games more when he has called them. Due to his notoriety he also commands a national audience on league pass when Kings play

Egads. Truly could we complete our transformation into the joke the Clippers were a decade ago. He's a distraction and an idiot.
 
Egads. Truly could we complete our transformation into the joke the Clippers were a decade ago. He's a distraction and an idiot.

Agreed. The guy needs to go have speaking CDs with William Shatner or something. Not announce Kings games.
 
Walton's shtick gets stale really quick. Like about 15 years ago stale. And you can tell he doesn't really follow the team from his comments when he shows up a few times a year. Given a choice of the two, I would take Reynolds. But even he is not nearly as informative or objective as he should. They try to get too much entertainment out of their broadcast. Perhaps given the quality of play on the court in recent years, they think they need to have that.
 
I really have no idea why some people prefer Grant to Reynolds. It defies belief. Grant hasn't a clue what he's talking about, and his arrogance is both misplaced and overwhelming. At least Reynolds is pleasant and a nice guy, even if his commentary isn't the best.

As for Walton, occasionally he can be funny (usually unintentionally) but he's generally annoying and trying too hard.
 
I really have no idea why some people prefer Grant to Reynolds. It defies belief. Grant hasn't a clue what he's talking about, and his arrogance is both misplaced and overwhelming. At least Reynolds is pleasant and a nice guy, even if his commentary isn't the best.

As for Walton, occasionally he can be funny (usually unintentionally) but he's generally annoying and trying too hard.

Really? I feel like he doesn't even try at all. It's almost as if he just shows up at these special events and makes things up as he goes along.
 
Really? I feel like he doesn't even try at all. It's almost as if he just shows up at these special events and makes things up as he goes along.

Exactly. Walton can make me laugh on occasion, but more often I wince at his overly dramatic style and wish I could mute his part of the broadcast. I think Walton appeals more to the occasional fan who doesn't realize how uninformed and self-contradicting he is.
As for Grant and Jerry, they work well together. Yes, Grant can be abrasive, and Jerry can be like a bad trip to the barber shop, but they combine fairly well - like oil and vinegar.
 
In a perfect world would permanently replace Reynolds. He's humorous, provocative and has made me enjoy Kings games more when he has called them. Due to his notoriety he also commands a national audience on league pass when Kings play


No way, Jerry rules. Walton is a good contrast as a special guest.
 
Jerry is the perfect Frack to Napears' Frick. Underneath "the hick from french lick" is one of the most NBA knowledgeable people any of us will know. He doesn't need to show us, just the front office. But we love Jerry and our collection of Jerryisms is growing every year. But Walton is the most automatic mute button action of any human on the boob tube. Craig Sager is a close 2nd.
 
Jerry is the perfect Frack to Napears' Frick. Underneath "the hick from french lick" is one of the most NBA knowledgeable people any of us will know. He doesn't need to show us, just the front office. But we love Jerry and our collection of Jerryisms is growing every year. But Walton is the most automatic mute button action of any human on the boob tube. Craig Sager is a close 2nd.

Jerry seems like a nice guy but I don't know that I'd praise him like this. The stuff that comes out of his mouth can be a little embarrassing in terms of flat out bizarre opinions on the game, ridiculous company-man homerism and weird jerryisms that some people like but I find amateurish. Not a fan of Walton but I'm personally ready for frick and frack to get the frack off the air.
 
Jerry seems like a nice guy but I don't know that I'd praise him like this. The stuff that comes out of his mouth can be a little embarrassing in terms of flat out bizarre opinions on the game, ridiculous company-man homerism and weird jerryisms that some people like but I find amateurish. Not a fan of Walton but I'm personally ready for frick and frack to get the frack off the air.

Have you watched many of the other teams' broadcast around the league? I would be careful what you wish for, because most of them are beyond painful to watch.
 
Have you watched many of the other teams' broadcast around the league? I would be careful what you wish for, because most of them are beyond painful to watch.

I do. I'm not a sac resident so I have to get league pass to watch the kings. As a result, I watch a lot of other teams. There are some very bad ones out there but I'd put our broadcast team at best in the middle of the league.
 
Great article. I miss Tom, and wow, remember how horrible Jayson Williams was? Every comment made a reference to the New Jersey Nets.

I'd take Bill Walton any day over Rick Kamla.
 
Back
Top