Livinthedream
All-Star
It takes real effort, commitment and determination to stay mad for 2 years about losing something that you never actually had.
It takes real effort, commitment and determination to stay mad for 2 years about losing something that you never actually had.
No it doesn't.Sounds like Turf Toe.
Have any conspiracy theorists thrown out the idea that the Bagley camp is hyping up the injury to get him out of this franchise yet? Bagley Sr. does seem like that much of a jerk.
May explain why there's not been a concrete diagnosis on the foot thing. Although I'm leaning towards the non-transparency that's become this FO's MO.
...Or are we not allowed to bandy conspiracy theories on this forum anymore? Because I'm making this post with a big giant shaker full of big giant grains of salt. I just miss the days of whacky whimsy around here, it really helped pass the time between one draft lotto to the next.
Blaming the fans is absolutely ridiculous. We can’t have nice things because we consistently have poor ownership that makes poor hiring decisions and rewards ineptitude.I for one will hold the fans accountable if this happens. People love to toss the word "embarrassment" around in here. Well, I'm embarrassed by the vitriolic sentiment expressed by some Kings fans towards Marvin Bagley. You want to know why we can't have nice things? Well, look at some of the vile comments made about Bagley.
Kings fans never used to be like that.
Blaming the fans is absolutely ridiculous. We can’t have nice things because we consistently have poor ownership that makes poor hiring decisions and rewards ineptitude.
The fans aren’t involved with the kings poor draft history. The fans haven’t hired the coaches, or managed the salary cap, the fans don’t run a coaching carousel. The fans certainly didn’t reward Vlades poor decision making with a contract extension.
The fans are rightfully upset. Attendance continues to drop. The kings shouldn’t be rewarded for how poorly this franchise is run, and fans certainly shouldn’t be labeled as toxic for calling a spade a spade.
Some fans have taking things too far, but we’re talking about a very small minority here that aren’t representative of the general populace of fans. It’s completely unfair and absolves the actual responsible parties of guilt.
Come on, now, that’s not fair. Per Amick, Vivek is fixing to fire Vlade before the season even ends for the express purpose of Vlade drafting Bagley. Bagley getting traded in the summer would have nothing to do with the fans. Listen to Amick, Vivek is a laughingstock at any NBA gathering. His peers think he’s a joke. That’s what he’s embarrassed about.I for one will hold the fans accountable if this happens. People love to toss the word "embarrassment" around in here. Well, I'm embarrassed by the vitriolic sentiment expressed by some Kings fans towards Marvin Bagley. You want to know why we can't have nice things? Well, look at some of the vile comments made about Bagley.
Kings fans never used to be like that.
Do you think Sacramento is the only place that does this? This happens everywhere and quite frankly it’s not even that bad what he’s receiving, hell Luke has gotten more hate than him. If what’s happens with Bagley happened in a bigger market than this he’d be in some trouble. If he’s looking at our comments and he’s affected by it than I’ll gladly drive him to the airport myself if he’s traded.
Also if Bagley was producing anything or looked like a future star he wouldn’t be criticized as much. At this point it’s not even about Luka going after him
I for one will hold the fans accountable if this happens. People love to toss the word "embarrassment" around in here. Well, I'm embarrassed by the vitriolic sentiment expressed by some Kings fans towards Marvin Bagley. You want to know why we can't have nice things? Well, look at some of the vile comments made about Bagley.
Kings fans never used to be like that.
Yet it never attempts to stop any blaming/toxicity towards NBA refs which is in every single game thread as to why the Kings supposedly can't win a game this year.This place always blames the fans for being too toxic or whatever so you can try to curb the hate pointed at certain other people.
You didn't need to make a post explaining that you were going to do that; it went without saying.
lmaoWelp, shut down the internet, guys. Joshoua has spoken.
I for one will hold the fans accountable if this happens. People love to toss the word "embarrassment" around in here. Well, I'm embarrassed by the vitriolic sentiment expressed by some Kings fans towards Marvin Bagley. You want to know why we can't have nice things? Well, look at some of the vile comments made about Bagley.
Kings fans never used to be like that.
Do you think Sacramento is the only place that does this? This happens everywhere and quite frankly it’s not even that bad what he’s receiving, hell Luke has gotten more hate than him. If what’s happens with Bagley happened in a bigger market than this he’d be in some trouble. If he’s looking at our comments and he’s affected by it than I’ll gladly drive him to the airport myself if he’s traded.
Also if Bagley was producing anything or looked like a future star he wouldn’t be criticized as much. At this point it’s not even about Luka going after him
He shouldn't.Why should Bagley get any hate? Explain that to me please.
Yes, it is a source of pride. And yes it is THE selling point, because we do not have other selling points. And that is a problem. As much as it is - and should be - a point of pride, it is likely very low on the list of reasons for players to want to come here and stay here. Being a good run franchise, being a perennial contender., having a reputation for developing players and being able to offer monetary incentives (not just by overpaying but also local advertising income - be a Pizza Guy!) are things which are much more important. Especially in today's game, where loyalty to a team has become loyalty to the NBA as Parker pointed out. He is not wrong and I don't have an issue with that. But it does show that a loyal fanbase means very little on the grander scale of things. And this franchise is more or less only good at overpaying for underperforming players.I hear the argument that this fanbase is easier on players than others and players should and need to be able to handle criticism and hate, even when unwarranted, because everyone does it. The fanbase and how they treat their players has always been a source of pride with this franchise. That is literally the selling point for this team around the league.
We love when players like HG say how great the fans are. Beam with pride. So it really is disappointing when fans turn on a player who has not said a bad word about the fans and is suffering through some injuries. To say the player deserves it due to lack of improvement, when he hasn't played this season is not a good look, no matter how you slice it. Neither is "everyone does it" because I'm not sure it's true to that extent. But more importantly, it is incongruous to love when players and their families speak about how great the Kings fans are, like with HG and Holmes, and to also say players should be unaffected by negative fan talk.
He shouldn't.
But in today's world, and especially the social media world, it happens unfortunately and it is not something that will go away soon, I fear.
That means that it is a fact that Bagley has to deal with, just like every other famous sportspersons and other celebrities. If he can't, that is likely a problem for him and every franchise he will be part of.
Just imagine if the internet had been a thing when Michael Jordan broke his foot a couple of games into his second season and then proceeded to miss pretty much the entire year after that.I don’t understand why any real fan blames a player because of injury. It’s not fair to the player, team or rest of the fan base.
Yes, it is a source of pride. And yes it is THE selling point, because we do not have other selling points. And that is a problem. As much as it is - and should be - a point of pride, it is likely very low on the list of reasons for players to want to come here and stay here. Being a good run franchise, being a perennial contender., having a reputation for developing players and being able to offer monetary incentives (not just by overpaying but also local advertising income - be a Pizza Guy!) are things which are much more important. Especially in today's game, where loyalty to a team has become loyalty to the NBA as Parker pointed out. He is not wrong and I don't have an issue with that. But it does show that a loyal fanbase means very little on the grander scale of things. And this franchise is more or less only good at overpaying for underperforming players.
So for me, this is shifting the discussion from what is really the problem (horrible FO) to a non sequitur (the fans are chasing players away) It is is disingenuous and reeks of Stockholm Syndrome, pardon me saying.
Who around here (or anywhere else) says that he deserves it? Serious question.
I think there is a very small and focal group on social media that say this awful stuff to Bagley (and maybe others) and I don't even know if they are real fans or just people venting their frustration of life.
You see hate here? I don't see it.At least we agree he should not get any hate.
As far as the follow up justification and saying he better get used to it, sure I get it. Its a tough world out there. You got to be able to eat nails and pee tacks.
But this is Kings Fans Forum and there is no place for the hate here IMO.
You see hate here? I don't see it.
I see mostly reasonable and at least understandable takes. Some snarky comments but nothing really nasty.
But the word 'hate' has broader meaning nowadays than it did back in the day, so maybe I am misinterpreting.
Just imagine if the internet had been a thing when Michael Jordan broke his foot a couple of games into his second season and then proceeded to miss pretty much the entire year after that.
NOTE FOR THE STUPID: I am NOT comparing Marvin to the greatest player of all time.
You see hate here? I don't see it.
I see mostly reasonable and at least understandable takes. Some snarky comments but nothing really nasty.
But the word 'hate' has broader meaning nowadays than it did back in the day, so maybe I am misinterpreting.
Why should Bagley get any hate? Explain that to me please.
You see hate here? I don't see it.
I see mostly reasonable and at least understandable takes. Some snarky comments but nothing really nasty.
But the word 'hate' has broader meaning nowadays than it did back in the day, so maybe I am misinterpreting.
He’s getting criticism not hate no he doesn’t deserve hate