I don't doubt that there's some truth to it. The Kings, when including the FO, have 50 or so agendas. Sh*t isn't always harmonious.
The part that I don't agree with is that Haynes has a direct line to what the FO is thinking. One thing Vlade has done well is keep FO leaks muted--no one saw the Boogie trade coming (even after Ham's infamous Boogie is the future report) and most folks thought the Bags > Doncic thing was a smokescreen--mostly because folks couldn't get a source to confirm or deny until the day of the draft.
The Bjelly over Bags thing, if true, would land at Vlade and Peja's feet more than it would land at Joeger's. They signed him and until recently, Bjelly starting over Bags was justified. So I have a hard time seeing that as reasoning for why the FO would be pissed at Joeger.
The above is basically a long winded way of saying this smells as though its from the players. If true, the likeliest are:
1. Skal. Lack of playing time. My retort and the FO's retort should be--you had two years to show out.
2. Giles. Out of the rotation. My retort and the FO's retort should be--you were in the rotation and played yourself out of it. Work yourself back in.
3. Bags. 20 minutes per game. My retort and the FO's retort should be--you're less than 20% of the way into your Rookie season. Continue putting your work in and let it come to you.
My money is on Skal's camp. He has the most to gain from the leak. Sometimes its that simple.
If it is Giles camp, I really don't know why they're complaining.
If it Bags, I don't doubt Puma has a say in it and Bags comes from a family that has a history of speaking out--his grandpa (Joe Caldwell, former NBA player) was effectively banned from the league. See here:
https://bleacherreport.com/articles...coveted-recruit-with-unique-game-and-pedigree