I hate this unnamed sources crap. It's just like Reynold's said: Who is the source? What is the agenda? What is the accuracy?
Even if it's true, it absolutely should not be aired in the public arena. Basically, it's an attack on the organization as far as I am concerned. An attack that is aimed at the cohesiveness of this team and the authority of the coaching staff.
I'd love to have Bagley play more, but Joerger has got to be the one to make the decision on the matter. Is there anything wrong with Divac talking to Joerger and suggesting some things if Divac wants Bagley to play more? Not at all. They all have to discuss players and their progress or not on an ongoing basis. But this kind of thing just makes Joerger look bad if he does play Bagley, in which case he's the weak tool of management, or if he does not play Bagley, in which case people, especially players, wonder how long coach is going to be around.
Whatever source put this out there should be ashamed of himself.