Artest

Entity

Hall of Famer
#31
i am guessing you don't want Miller gone for the same reasons as Artest. He is not a me first type of guy at all.

I don't understand the Miller thing from you. He is giving us what we want. rebounding, shotblocking, defense, scoring and essentially he runs our offense. Without Miller this season we would for certain be getting a high pick this year.
 

Mr. S£im Citrus

Doryphore of KingsFans.com
Staff member
#32
i am guessing you don't want Miller gone for the same reasons as Artest. He is not a me first type of guy at all.
No, not the same reasons as Artest... Miller's actually a good character guy, and I'll be the first to admit that my dislike of him is not a rational one... I just don't like him.

I'm a bruiser when I play basketball, and I like physical play. I'm actually more like a mini-Ben Wallace myself, so perhaps that will give you some insight into my tastes in basketball. There's something about a center that shoots three-pointers that makes me gnash my teeth in anger.
 

Entity

Hall of Famer
#33
No, not the same reasons as Artest... Miller's actually a good character guy, and I'll be the first to admit that my dislike of him is not a rational one... I just don't like him.

I'm a bruiser when I play basketball, and I like physical play. I'm actually more like a mini-Ben Wallace myself, so perhaps that will give you some insight into my tastes in basketball. There's something about a center that shoots three-pointers that makes me gnash my teeth in anger.
Understandable. but did you see Miller school Ben the other night? Out jumping out hustling out rebounding and we were on a back to back. In fact Miller had more rebounds and points than Wallace and Noah combined. And for the first time in years you can't say its a fluke. Miller has changed and is a man possed. If he keeps this up for the remainder of his contract it is well worth it.
 

Mr. S£im Citrus

Doryphore of KingsFans.com
Staff member
#34
I saw it; he's played great here recently, and I give him credit... but he still shoots threes, and I still don't like him...

I remember during the first Bulls three-peat, when Phil Jackson used to fine Cartright and Grant $1000 if they shot a three-pointer; that's what I'm talkin' about... :D
 

Entity

Hall of Famer
#35
He only averages 1 a game and is hitting them at a 30% clip and secures the fact that the center has to come out to guard him. Look at how many backcuts we have with no opposing center in the paint. If we had a Grant and Cartwright Martin would have to be Jordan to get as close to the rim as he does. Don't compare Miller to guys that had Jordan and Pippen.
 

Mr. S£im Citrus

Doryphore of KingsFans.com
Staff member
#36
I wasn't comparing him to anybody; I was explaining my tastes in centers, and I used the anecdote about the 91-93 Bulls to illustrate what I, for example, would do, if I was the head coach of a basketball team and saw my center shoot a three pointer.

As far as pulling the center out for back cuts, Divac wasn't a threat to shoot threes, and we seemed to do alright.
 

Glenn

Hall of Famer
#37
I do not think that it is unique that Artest has been involved in off-the-court trouble. What I do think is unique is that many Kings Fans, in my opinion, want to defend Artest beyond what I consider to be in good reason, because of his talent. It's not uncommon for players to **** up; what is uncommon is for fans to keep giving guys like that an unlimited number of chances. I'll bet you don't hear anybody talking about how Jamaal Tinsley isn't really that bad. I expect owners and GM's to keep giving players like that unlimited chances, because they're looking at dollar signs, or whatever, but I guess I hold myself to a higher standard.

He has with me.

My opinion is that Artest is a me-first player that impedes the Kings' team concept. I think that he kills the offense and that, in some ways, the team wins almost in spite of him. I think that he's a detriment, and I want him gone. Although, to be fair, I want Bibby, Thomas and Abdur-Rahim gone, too. As a matter of fact, his recent resurgence notwithstanding, I'll go on record as saying I still want Miller gone, too.
With you, it appears that when someone gets on your **** list, he cannot get off no matter if he is a model citizen and an All Pro. That's an observation built over many years and not just with Artest.

After reading all your answers, I have concluded that I can ignore your opinions because they are almost never positive. It is as if the "positive prop" bone is missing form your anatomy or more likely, from your soul. Therefore your opinions are useless (harsh judgment on my part as privately I have sought your advice) because there is a certain incredible one sidedness to them.

Any basketball player can be criticized because no one is perfect. In like fashion for me all basketball players also have a positive aspect to their game. You seem incapable of seeing the positives.

Therefore your opinions are of no use to me because they are not balanced. You go out of your way to find the negatives and ignore obvious positives. Last game he had 28 points on 50% shooting with 3 out of 5 three pointers. I assume he played good defense.

As to people defending Ron, if you are putting me in that basket, I can only say that I think he is our best player. I have welcomed some compulsive person with time on their hands to review Bricklayers's grades this year and last year and I will bet the player with the highest grade average is Ron. This is rating him at the job he is paid to do.

On the other hand, my solution to solving the log jam at the 2/3 position is to trade Ron, not because he brings back the best player but because he is the riskiest to keep. I don't want to trade him because he "looks crazy" or "looks unbalanced" or that some mythical clock is ticking. Although that clock was ticking for awhile, it has stopped although the positive change is not worthy of mention. Artest only brings out negative comments from fans.

I also think Ron is intelligent and there is something likable about a guy who sets goals higher than those that are achievable and then gives 100% to achieve those goals. His willingness to teach the young players after practice is laudable.

As to his play recently, it's been good. I didn't see the last game where his appearance seemed to cause one person to say he "looks crazy" or something like that. As a psychiatrist, I have never heard of such observations of a player being part of any set of symptoms to judge a players mental state. If Ron farts while walking past the Maloofs it will be seen as an attack on the Maloofs or at the least, a high sign of disrespect and perhaps worth a few inches of writing in the Bee.

Where will we stand if he plays out his full contract with us; another year and a half? What if he does nothing wrong except occasionally go on a one on one spurt. And what if Theus breaks him of that? Let's give Theus more than 30 games to bring Ron into the fold. I think it will be like catching lightening in a bottle and maybe even the most skittish of fans will have to see that Ron Artest is a major contributor to any success this team has.

Fire away.





ps: I remember getting slammed by a mod for hijacking a thread. Why are we discussing Miller?
 
Last edited:

Entity

Hall of Famer
#38
We had Webber pulling them out. Like now Mikki stays low and Miller pulls them out. Quite frankly i don't know how having 2 post players at the same time would work with our style of play. Salmons, Martin, and Udrich thrive on getting to the basket. With 2 post players you have thier defenders and the 2 big guys defending them in the paint. As of now Mikki boxes out and Brad in on the elbow therefore they just have to contend with their defender.
 
#39
When Mikki Moore charges the stands and starts smacking the paying audience, then maybe he and Ron Artest will be judged on the same anger scale.
Ron let his emotion got the better of thim. It's wrong to scare the audience and stupid when you getting pay big money to do that but it ain't wrong to go after a guy that threw things at you.

If going after a guy that threw things at you is mentally unstable than hell I'm mentally unstable too. However I'm not stupid enough to do that at work.;)

Back to the thread...

I too have enjoy watching Ron played lately. Props to Ron. Props to the Kings...2-0 for Febraury...only 12 more wins to go for my 14-0 February prediction.. :)
 
Last edited:

Mr. S£im Citrus

Doryphore of KingsFans.com
Staff member
#40
With you, it appears that when someone gets on your **** list, he cannot get off no matter if he is a model citizen and an All Pro. That's an observation built over many years and not just with Artest.
What of it? I'll be the first to admit that; I hold grudges, and offer no apologies for it.

After reading all your answers, I have concluded that I can ignore your opinions because they are almost never positive. It is as if the "positive prop" bone is missing form your anatomy or more likely, from your soul. Therefore your opinions are useless (harsh judgment on my part as privately I have sought your advice) because there is a certain incredible one sidedness to them.
So be it. I'm not interested in selling my opinion to you. Take from my words that which you wish. Or don't, makes no never mind to me; your determination that my opinion has no worth to you is not going to stop me from expressing my opinion, as I do not post for your benefit. I will just say this on my behalf, and consider the matter closed: I wasn't born without a "positive prop bone." And I didn't just wake up one morning and discover I didn't have one any more. Take (or do not) whatever you want to from that.
 
Last edited:
#41

I remember during the first Bulls three-peat, when Phil Jackson used to fine Cartright and Grant $1000 if they shot a three-pointer; that's what I'm talkin' about... :D
Are you comparing Phil Jackson to Adelman, Mussleman and Theus? Brad through his first 7 years only took 89 3's. I remember the year Brad took 88 Rick said he wanted him to shoot 1 per game. Then Mussleman and Theus continued the trend.

But you are right about Artest destroying the offense. How many times do you see him on his back out of the next play even on made shots? When he posts up, if he does not get a foul call, it is a fast break the other way.
 

Glenn

Hall of Famer
#43
But you are right about Artest destroying the offense. How many times do you see him on his back out of the next play even on made shots? When he posts up, if he does not get a foul call, it is a fast break the other way.
If this is so, how would the kings have done in the last 4 games without Artest? Maybe we would have hit 130? Saying that he destroys the offense is a pretty strong statement.
 

Kingster

Hall of Famer
#45
Seduction

When he's playing well you want to forget everything about his history, just pretend it doesn't exist and pretend that he's not a little off-kilter. Unfortunately, it's all wishful thinking. You have to pry your current emotional euphoria about his fine play from cold hard logic. He's played well lately, so my hope is that other GM is seduced by him, just like Petrie/Malloofs were seduced by him.
 

Glenn

Hall of Famer
#46
When he's playing well you want to forget everything about his history, just pretend it doesn't exist and pretend that he's not a little off-kilter. Unfortunately, it's all wishful thinking. You have to pry your current emotional euphoria about his fine play from cold hard logic. He's played well lately, so my hope is that other GM is seduced by him, just like Petrie/Malloofs were seduced by him.
So do I.
 
#47
If this is so, how would the kings have done in the last 4 games without Artest? Maybe we would have hit 130? Saying that he destroys the offense is a pretty strong statement.
I see I need to explain a little. There are times like the Chicago game where he had a definite mismatch in Noah. He goes right around him and dunks it. Those are the times we should be looking to post him up. Other times we give him the ball and everyone stands around and watches. It reminds me back when Webber would have the ball and everyone would stand around.

Secondly, when he posts up he winds up on his back half the time. This always results in a 4 on 5 situation. After his 20 shots 11 times the Bulls scored, 5 times they did not and 4 times we got the offensive rebound. This may be my imagination but it seems that other team has an easier time setting up their offense when our best defender is out of position and has to run back into the play.

The whole point of this is I think Ron Ron could be even better if he did not force as many shots. With his strength and shooting touch he should be shooting better than 43.9%.
 
#48
I wouldn't bet on that.

While it certainly hasn't been seen in some time (almost certainly before your time), Artest isn't the first player to have a beer or some other object thrown at him. I'm fairly certain that he's the first player to rush the stands and hit somebody.
I'm pretty certain Artest would not have rushed the stands had he not already been fuming at Ben Wallace and the confrontation. My 2 cents. For the record I am and will always be a fan of Artests game, even if he is a little of his rocker.
 
#49
I have one question and I dont want to start a new thread just to get it answered.

is there anyone, or any trade scenario (that you guys can think of) where you would ship ron artest to phoenix?

I've been reading a lot of message boards lately since the paul gasol trade, and I read in one of the Phoenix boards talk about the possibility of trading for ron artest, due to their lack of size/ strength.

Phoenix has a trade exemption I believe, and the hawks draft pick to dangle. I just want to get a kings fans opinion on this trade posibility.

So do you see a trade that would benefit the kings for Artest?
 
Last edited:
#50
I have one question and I dont want to start a new thread just to get it answered.

is there anyone, or any trade scenario (that you guys can think of) where you would ship ron artest to phoenix?
I'd consider virtually any legal trade offer they had to make which didn't include Diaw. With a couple of minor exceptions, their other players are either not overpaid, or are near the end of their contracts, or both.
 
Last edited:

Warhawk

Give blood and save a life!
Staff member
#51
Sounds like he's not going to be around too much longer....

http://www.sacbee.com/kings/story/687685.html

"He's doing good; he's doing good," Artest said of Theus. "I just think they (the Kings) would be better if I wasn't on the team. I think (Theus) would be doing much better."
Artest was asked why he felt that way, then reiterated his stance.
"I don't know, just personnel; just personnel," he said. "It'd be better if I wasn't on the team."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
#52
This year isn't over yet and anything can still happen.
Seasons change, people change. ;)
Lets enjoy the Kings with him for now, it isn't that bad.
 
#53
What say you, Artest defenders? This is TOTALLY something Mikki Moore or Brad Miller would say, right?? Right?

Or maybe not.
 

Glenn

Hall of Famer
#54
What say you, Artest defenders? This is TOTALLY something Mikki Moore or Brad Miller would say, right?? Right?

Or maybe not.
I don't know why this has turned into a battle between defenders and haters in your mind. The thread was just meant to give credit where credit is due. With a huge majority of posts on this forum saying that he needs to go and in fact saying he is holding up the development of Cisco and Salmons, what is so odd that he would say the same thing? It just shows that he knows what is up.

I admire his skills and want him traded. It's not mutually exclusive.
 
#56
I just hope we get something back in return that is decent. If not a player, than a draft pick... None of this Kleiza crap, because he's a SF, and we don't need a SF.
 
#58
This tells me that Artest knows he's being traded...WOOHOO!!! Go Petrie! It's your birthday!
Typically GM's don't say Hey...we are trading you. He's just repeating what he's heard in the media and probably on forums like these. I honestly think his feelings are hurt and he's trying to take it like a man, and show that if he gets traded it's best for everyone.

This means NOTHING about him in fact getting traded.
 
#59
What say you, Artest defenders? This is TOTALLY something Mikki Moore or Brad Miller would say, right?? Right?

Or maybe not.

I'm not a hater or defender, but I say he's repeating what he's heard/read in the media, and on forums like this. Like I said in my last post I think his feelings are hurt and he's just trying to take it like a man and show that it doesn't bother for him, and that he thinks it would be best for everyone. It means NOTHING. He's not asking for a trade, he's just saying the team might be better without him. Which he may actually think.

If he honestly thinks that then you are getting honesty in a form you don't usually see it from players in sports. Artest doesn't have a fitler between his brain and his mouth, he just says what's on his mind.
 
#60
I just wish he would shut the **** up and let us trade him without damaging what little is left of his value in the trade market.

I will be a very happy man when we trade him. He is a cancer. For all his great talent, he takes more away from the team than he actually gives to the team.