Why no Artest trade yet? Here's why: Pacers CEO Donnie Walsh has some good bosses.
Ownership's willingness to empower Walsh to keep Artest on the inactive list for the rest of the season if necessary -- with pay -- alleviates some in-house pressure on Walsh to rush into a so-so deal.
The only other reason to make a deal quickly would be if the wait for a better offer became a distraction detrimental to the team, and it's conceivable that Indy will reach that point eventually. Yet with the Pacers accustomed to bigger distractions than this after last season, and with
Danny Granger already showing flashes of his Poor Man's Artest potential, Walsh figures his team can keep winning pretty regularly in the short-term while he keeps looking.
Among the possibilities Indy has apparently dismissed is the, uh, interesting idea of Minnesota signing-and-trading
Latrell Sprewell to the Pacers (along with
Michael Olowokandi) for Artest.
The Wolves haven't renounced their rights to Sprewell, who would likely make more money in a sign-and-trade than he could waiting for someone to sign him outright -- even if the minimum three-year contract he would be obligated by league rules to sign in such a scenario came with only one year guaranteed. Yet the Pacers, for some reason, aren't prepared to give Artest's locker to Spree.
The Lakers, meanwhile, are not optimistic about their chances of acquiring
Ron Artest, no matter how much Phil Jackson likes Ron-Ron and no matter how loudly certain media gnats plea for this to happen. L.A. simply lacks the pieces to deal directly with the Pacers and has been unable to concoct a three-team deal that interests Indy.
The Pacers, according to NBA front-office sources, would rather deal with the Lakers' co-tenants anyway. The Clippers, though, have resisted -- even though the prospect of importing Artest doesn't scare coach Mike Dunleavy one bit.
It's also believed that owner Donald Sterling would embrace the idea of adding Artest and all zaniness that comes with the big-name buzz, but Clips management remains unwilling to part with
Corey Maggette.
Chris Wilcox is the best player they're willing to include a deal for now.
You can argue that this isn't the time, given Clipperland's first tangible stability in forever, to be gambling on Artest. It's an argument I would echo. Yet it's also undeniably tantalizing to imagine Artest -- assuming you could actually count on him -- forming a beastly frontcourt partnership with
Elton Brand. Or Artest playing power forward, shifting Brand to center and running
Shaun Livingston as a point forward alongside
Sam Cassell and
Cuttino Mobley.