R
Rome
Guest
well, good bye playoffs and hello fishing
hoops4kings said:Napear just said the suspension was one of the worst calls by the NBA in his 18 years of covering the sport.
Rowdyone said:Didn't have too with BSPN, who has a vested interest in seeing the Spurs win with an eventual SA/Detroit series, all over it.
Both were called fouls.DocHolliday said:Ginobli's was actually called as a foul, Artest's wasn't.
Fillmoe said:to the shoulder huh?
![]()
uolj said:Both were called fouls.
DocHolliday said:What does a picture of Miami and the lakers have to do with Sac and San Antonio?
No, Ginobili's elbow was not called a foul. Ginobili was called for an offensive foul on Brad Miller on that drive to the basket. You can check ESPN's play-by-play and that's what they sid during the game too.uolj said:Both were called fouls.
VF21 said:...And my excitement about the 2006 playoffs shrivels up and dies...
I may just start watching hockey.
It wasn't called a flagrant (at first the ESPN announcers thought the call was against Miller). I personally thought Artest's forearm was more intentional than Ginobli's elbow, but I haven't seen replays of the elbow since it happened.DocHolliday said:Mike and Grant said it wasn't called a foul. As I said iin a earlier post I was napping when this happened, but I have seen the replay. Was it called a flagrant foul in the game??
Either way it doesn't change the fact that Artests elbow was no more intentional than Ginobli's elbow to Artest.
At first, the announcers assumed that the offensive foul call against Ginobli was from when he went near Miller because it was such a late call, but then they seemed to change their minds because there wasn't really any contact with Miller and my assumption was that the official made it clear that it was the elbow. I didn't look closely enough myself to see for sure, but because there was really no foul after the elbow my guess is that is what was called and everybody assumed it was something else because the whistle was so late.kennadog said:No, Ginobili's elbow was not called a foul. Ginobili was called for an offensive foul on Brad Miller on that drive to the basket. You can check ESPN's play-by-play and that's what they said during the game too.
Grant and Jerry thought it was for the elbow to Artest at first, but then said it wasn't. It was being called a Ginobili foul on Brad Miller. And that is what ESPN's play-by-play reflects.uolj said:It wasn't called a flagrant (at first the ESPN announcers thought the call was against Miller). I personally thought Artest's forearm was more intentional than Ginobli's elbow, but I haven't seen replays of the elbow since it happened.At first, the announcers assumed that the offensive foul call against Ginobli was from when he went near Miller because it was such a late call, but then they seemed to change their minds because there wasn't really any contact with Miller and my assumption was that the official made it clear that it was the elbow. I didn't look closely enough myself to see for sure, but because there was really no foul after the elbow my guess is that is what was called and everybody assumed it was something else because the whistle was so late.
Spurs announcer talking on KHTK just said Ron was suspended because he's Ron. He said anybody else did that, they wouldn't get suspended. Not that it's gonna help us.VF21 said:I should never post when I'm upset or something like this first comes out...
I'm still pretty disgusted about the whole situation. I think the league was unfair, I thnk Manu intentionally fouled Ron right at the beginning to try and get into his head, and I think Ron's foul was, at worst, a flagrant 1.
Having said all that, I do still love this team. And I will watch tomorrow - because to do anything less would be unfathomable. I am a Kings fan. Through the good, the bad and the ugly ...
VF21 said:I should never post when I'm upset or something like this first comes out...
I'm still pretty disgusted about the whole situation. I think the league was unfair, I thnk Manu intentionally fouled Ron right at the beginning to try and get into his head, and I think Ron's foul was, at worst, a flagrant 1.
Having said all that, I do still love this team. And I will watch tomorrow - because to do anything less would be unfathomable. I am a Kings fan. Through the good, the bad and the ugly ...
I totally agree. The more replays of that first play I saw during the game, the more I thought it was definitely intentional. He glanced back at Ron and then swung that elbow right into his face as he turned. It looked obviously intentional to me, that Ginobili had decided to send a message on the first play.VF21 said:I thnk Manu intentionally fouled Ron right at the beginning to try and get into his head, and I think Ron's foul was, at worst, a flagrant 1.
kennadog said:Spurs announcer talking on KHTK just said Ron was suspended because he's Ron. He said anybody else did that, they wouldn't get suspended. Not that it's gonna help us.