Another one bites the dust

This thread is now about Muffins

muffins.jpg

AWESOME! Dibs on the one in the bottom left corner!
 
I am trying to understand your logic, we should move Evans over to SG for the simple reason that dominant SG's (like that cocky guy on LA) will get you further then dominant PG's?

Please feel free to elaborate on that, instead of claiming people who actually know what they are talking about don't have valid arguments (those are the only type of rebuddles I have ever seen from Brick)

Your wasting your time. There is no logic, and there's no answer that you can give him/her/it, that will ever satisfy. A troll is a troll. Every thread this person or thing has started has been exactly the same. Its just about getting people to argue with one another. The best thing you can do is just ignore the creature. Otherwise you'll be going through an exercise in frustration.
 
Your wasting your time. There is no logic, and there's no answer that you can give him/her/it, that will ever satisfy. A troll is a troll. Every thread this person or thing has started has been exactly the same. Its just about getting people to argue with one another. The best thing you can do is just ignore the creature. Otherwise you'll be going through an exercise in frustration.
I like you too.
wanna-muffin.jpg
 
Yes, it's that time of the year.
And another team with dominant PG fails to go the distance in the NBA.
Do you really want Kings to follow that pattern?
Or is it better to play Evans at SG?

The celtics got
to the NBA finals...And they barely lost in game 7. So this means having a good pg is not a good idea?
 
What kind of question is this really? The Celts were a great team that just ran out of gas in the end. The refs giving the lakers 21 FTs in the 4th also didn't help (but who in here is surprised about that really?)

Anyway, as long as we become a successful team and actually have a chance to win a title, I don't care what position Tyreke plays.
 
Back
Top