Zach LaVine most years is top notch in iso. The last two seasons he's been around the 37th percentile. Last year he was obviously hurt most of the year but him being that this year is rather odd. It's very unusual for him.
I am wiling to give Zach some time, but DDR will probably need to go, nothing wrong with him, just not a good fit.
It gets really old watching Sabonis do nothing on defense. Pacers targeted him all game.
Lost count of how many times Domas stood in the paint, guarding no one, while pointing to every other player making someone guard 2 on the perimeter and they get an open 3.
I know he gets his box score stats (woohoo) but that isn’t winning basketball. Great for individual accolades but when you’re giving up points like that at the other end it negates the offensive numbers.
Also, horrible coaching by DC to close with Monk instead of Ellis… Will these coaches ever learn?
I think he must have it in his mind that Derozan, Lavine, and Monk are his closers. When Christie let Monk know that he wouldn't be starting, he probably told him that he would still close.
It's still not working and anybody who is watching close in a neutral objective way, is not expecting it to work in any consistent way against good/decent teams
I don't think the players do either. I'm in mental tank mode.I feel nothing
I got there two days ago. Come on in, that water's fine.You win this and you could go on a 3 game winning streak at the very least and maybe give yourself a chance. It’s over over. I’ll be rooting for the Suns to make the play in. We have now lost ten of thirteen.
This is partly the nature of the NBA. The players get paid way more than the head coach in almost every case and they also tend to have more job security too. Which means if you have DeRozan, LaVine, and Monk on your team as a head coach you have to play them their 30 mpg. The starting/closing thing is almost inconsequential -- they're going to get their minutes and if they're not winning those minutes than you're better off getting them off the roster. That or you build your entire organization around a head coach and a system and you make sure your players know that they are secondary to that. Which only works if you're winning... so here we are back in Catch-22 land again.
This is partly the nature of the NBA. The players get paid way more than the head coach in almost every case and they also tend to have more job security too. Which means if you have DeRozan, LaVine, and Monk on your team as a head coach you have to play them their 30 mpg. The starting/closing thing is almost inconsequential -- they're going to get their minutes and if they're not winning those minutes than you're better off getting them off the roster. That or you build your entire organization around a head coach and a system and you make sure your players know that they are secondary to that. Which only works if you're winning... so here we are back in Catch-22 land again.
Sabonis' defense has been really bad lately. There's just no way you can pair him with Lavine, Derozan, and Monk and think you're going anywhere
That non call on a wild swipe by Nembhard on Sabonis just killed the Kings that was beyond ridiculous it could have stopped the game and momentum just crazy stuff.
What’s embarrassing is anyone with rudimentary knowledge of the game knew that before any of the trades happen hell everyone knew DD with fox and Sabonis wasn’t gonna work
It's like we slashed the analytics department in 2023 and Monte and Vivek decided winning basketball actually looked like the 2007 Washington Wizards