So we get the rough end of the pineappple again?!
Smills how many trades are you planing on coming up with this off season. you are up to like 30 and the playoffs aren't even over with. Anyway. Artest in Denver with Anthony and Iverson??? Denver needs role players thats it.
Bynum, #19 and cap relief isn't too bad IMO.
im just giving you a little ribbing smills. actually, this kings board is a little slow compared to the other forums i frequent, so its nice to see a new topic when i come look at it.
like i said, i do hope you hit that profound trade, because it might be something no one has thought of before. and if it is that good, im sure those damn sacbee kids can "peruse" (ie steal information) and compile an article of possible trades, which is bound to come to petrie.
the nuggets aren't moving camby.
If the Kings could send out KT's contract with this trade, then it would be perfect.
Maybe add KT going to the Lakers. This will free up salary for Kings, and give the Lakers more depth that they lose through this trade. Maybe if KT's contract is too much, the Lakers could drop the 1st round pick or take some 2nd round picks? (The salaries worked in the realgm trader checker with KT added going to the Lakers, but im not sure if thats actually the case.)
Lakers would definitely do this. Bynum will be a great player, but it's gonna be awhile. Camby's a good player now who is definitely an upgrade over all the bigs they have now. Plus, Bibby's a huge upgrade over their current PGs. If the Lakers had Bibby in moments like that game 1 loss to the Suns, where Kobe shut down at the end, they'd be much better.I don't know what will push the Lakers' button, but the Lakers most likely aren't trading Bynum for anything less than a superstar-type player. Camby and Bibby are super role players at their peak, and Bynum and then some for a combination of those two?....And I'm not even sure if the Lakers are going to deal Mo Evans, he's seemingly been a nice fit there.
As for Denver, I'm not so sure if Artest is the mold of player they want. They already have many tough players on the inside (Evans, Nene, Anthony, Najera) and adding Artest to that mix, while dangerous, may seem somewhat redundant. The Nuggets have some shooting now in Steve Blake and JR Smith, but what they really need is perhaps an upgrade at the PG spot. Cook may fit, but not Artest.
The trade seems lopsided in our favor, despite giving away two of our key components from last year....
Haha!!The first (mega) post in this thread by the poster Sky might be of some interest to you, Original Poster.
http://www.clublakers.com/forums/laker-summer-faq-read-1st-post-on-pg-1-then-ask-qs-thx-t73655.html
It most probably wouldn't cost you modem but I think we would ask for Bynum.Jackson’s latest comments about Dennis Rodman point straight to wanting Artest. Fits the needs, triangle experience, and most importantly would not cost Odom or Bynum. First move is up to the Maloofs.
Haha!!
I personally find this bit funny
Haha!!
I personally find this bit funny
It most probably wouldn't cost you modem but I think we would ask for Bynum.
Your trade bait is not exactly great. Brown's expiring, Bynum, Farmer, Odom and pick 19 are your only trade currency. How delusional is it to think that we would trade Artest to the Lakers of all team and not ask for a Bynum or Odom.
Yeah that also was a beautyReally? I was even more amused by the Kwame, #19, Sasha for Ron AND Salmons suggestion. That's a realgm homer special right there.
Seriously, the way I see it, LA is in a really bad position. They don't have any cap space, they have some players they really don't want to trade and those that they are prepeared to trade just aren't good enough to get anything decent.
sadly, you can change "LA" with "Sacramento" and that would still be accurate...![]()
I think talent wise, apart from their Kobe and Odom combo, we have pieces that would have some trading currency.sadly, you can change "LA" with "Sacramento" and that would still be accurate...![]()