sactowndog
All-Star
It's sad too, because this team has the talent and experience where they should easily be few games over .500
If they had the talent they wouldn’t be as many games under .500. You are what your record says you are.
It's sad too, because this team has the talent and experience where they should easily be few games over .500
Well he'll probably get 2-3 billion dollar expansion fee if not more x2 when they add Seattle and Vegas especially if they get some other chump city to up the bidding.Wasn’t the dude in favor of the Seattle move?
also gotta admire that generational length going purely to nearly decapitating two guys in a single swoop.
I know but I've seen enough all season plus the Wemby play to know something is rotten. I don't even care about refs in a game like Portland we played like butt and deserved to get killed but this is not right. I am going to quit watching.the reffing wasn’t great but we should have been up 20 plus at half time but we allowed shooting practice from 3. Their confidence went up and they started splashing contested 3s too
So, you want us to believe that this team is less talented than last year's team, when the only significant personnel move is replacing Harrison Barnes with DeMar DeRozan? You're saying that change results in the Kings being less talented?If they had the talent they wouldn’t be as many games under .500.
to me the rebuild if there is one will be trading Fox for a young player or two and a couple picks. Say Tari Eason, Cam whitmore and a pick or two. Kings would still be super competitive without totally tearing things down to the studs. I’m not ready for that though, the thought makes me sick. Can’t be bad for 16 years and then tear it down to the studs after 2 seasons. Ugh
Another close loss. I missed most of the game spending time with family and had to follow the play-by-play. There were some definite positives going forward:
1) Malik Monk had his first start for the Kings and shot 50% from three and 50% from the field with seven rebounds and six assists. The starting unit looked strong overall until Sabonis got in late foul trouble.
2) Isaac Jones had a breakout game.
3) Five Kings scored in double figures.
4) DeMar DeRozan came back and scored a team-high 28 points on 50% shooting.
5) The Kings had only 10 turnovers against 31 assists.
Nah this is entirely a scheme thing/defensive communication thing.
Last year, we had Jordi calling out switches and coverages on defense. This year, Luke was supposed to pick up that role and he just hasn’t had the same juice. The good news is that you literally have one of the best defenders of this century/great communicator guy coaching on the bench right next to him but I dunno if Mike wants to upset the apple cart (Luke is De’Aaron’s guy through and through) at this point.
It stinks but Fox’s contract is going to force the issue if this team doesn’t start competing soon.
also gotta admire that generational length going purely to nearly decapitating two guys in a single swoop.
We have the Grizzlies, Rockets and Spurs up next. If we go 0-3 someone is getting fired or demoted.
I’m being super Debbie downer right now but this team is a 3 game winning streak from completely flipping the season but how do we get there?
This call should have been challenged. Don't know what the Kings assistants were doing.
also gotta admire that generational length going purely to nearly decapitating two guys in a single swoop.
As a coach, you change the defensive scheme like 8 games ago. Then you make a commitment to it, by sitting guys down for a bit, if they sag off and leave their man open at the 3 pt line.
So, you want us to believe that this team is less talented than last year's team, when the only significant personnel move is replacing Harrison Barnes with DeMar DeRozan? You're saying that change results in the Kings being less talented?
The problem with saying, "I'm not going to harp on what the Kings are doing wrong, if they're winning" is that that take only ages well if the Kings actually win.It was an absolutely awesome game played by the Kings in every way except one. Unfortunately that one negative is the only thing people want to talk about. And yes, I know, that 3pt defense from the Kings is a problem. I've never said it wasn't a problem just that I'm not going to harp on about it when the Kings are actually winning. But the Kings lost this game by 2pts so I guess the flood gates are open.
As a coach, you change the defensive scheme like 8 games ago. Then you make a commitment to it, by sitting guys down for a bit, if they sag off and leave their man open at the 3 pt line.
it seems worth trying. Some of their threes we were the 30 foot variety, 5 of them wet by the dumb 7’4 alien that you can’t really guard and some were contested. The problem is that’s the first thing on the scouting report “ kings give up the 3”. Guys shoot with confidence, a few go down and then it’s a problem all game. 3 point shooting is provably 80 percent mental. We need to change that comfort level or they will continue to make them, even the ones we play good defense on
The freaky gumby guy didn't win this game. It was leaving other shooters open, time and again. Reduce that and you can survive big games from top individuals
We were a 10th place team last year who is playing worse and others got better. The changes we made did nothing to address our issues.
So, he threw the players under the bus?