It is long since beyond embarrassing.
Yeah, I don’t see anybody really disagreeing that 75% of the current roster is gone in 47 months.
So, there is no way to objectively measure how this move fits this over the relatively short term of two seasons from now.
There is no way Carl Landry’s 4 year deal on it's own generates this type of heat. It can’t be the fit … because you are saying he doesn’t fit with players that are mostly going to walk or be flopped for 8-12 men the GM hopes might fit better. Strange.
A lot of the zealots on the board had dreams of a 1999 turnaround and/or hopes and dreams that involved Evans, Patterson, IT ect, who they are very attached to. I’d be shocked if those players were around next year. You don’t have to like these moves … but Landry at this price shouldn’t cause a monkey poop fight at the zoo.
Oh, speaking of 1999, a good 1/3 of the town killed the Valde signing at the time. The team should have signed Ike Austin. He was bigger, stronger, and could block shots. This is not my opinion. That’s a fact.
It’s a compelling read, so don’t let us slow you down … but this is so bizarre.