Wow there is a lot of negative "group think" going on about Chris Wallace for some reason. I don't get it. Guess we'll all see. I just can't believe Vivek isn't getting more benefit of the doubt here. Wallace isn't getting credit for moves that DID work out (Marc Gasol) nor is he getting any slack based on meddling owners/underminers in the Grizzlies org. I mean seriously, there is this group groaning about "missteps" is just weird to me. Michael Malone & Chris Wallace have zero f*** ups so far as the Kings leaders. Lets give 'em a shot. To call this a "misstep" at this stage of the game just is a really really really pessimistic approach.
I'm really not understanding this position. Obviously anyone that isn't currently a part of the Kings organization is unknown and will continue to be until they perform in some way. Are we really claiming that past performance, philosophy, mentorship, etc can't influence our opinions of these moves before they are made. If that's the case, why have a message board at all. Unless its simply to pat each other on the back regardless of any move is made unless it doesn't work out, at which point we can all set our collective hair on fire.
To be clear, I'm in favor of the Malone move because of his reputation with players and other coaches, who he has worked with, and his philosophy. I am against the Wallace move due to the opposite. He's had major roles in two franchises, with different ownership groups, financial restraint, etc. Boston was a complete disaster. Memphis was far more successful. In terms of the moves in Memphis that led to their current success (guys that played meaningful minutes):
1. Drafting Mike Conley: He had nothing to do with this move. He was hired four days prior to the draft and this was the coaches pick.
2. Acquiring Marc Gasol: This was called one of the worst trades of all time and Chris Wallace himself has stated he didn't think Marc Gasol would come over to the states. That basically means he traded Pau Gasol for Kwame Brown, Javaris Crittendon and 2 late 1st rounders. I think its funny that people try to excuse this trade as being owner meddling while at the same time arguing that the Gasol acquisition somehow is a positive for Wallace.
3. Acquiring Zach Randolph: A very risky move at the time as Randolph's value was at an all time low but I think this was a really good move.
4. Tayshawn Prince: A nice glue piece but only there because Wallace swapped Gay for Kevin Love and then significantly overpaid for Rudy which impacted his value. They will still be paying a quickly diminishing Prince for the next 2 years.
5. Tony Allen: I love Tony Allen and like that Wallace has seen the value in him at a couple different spots.
6. Jerryd Bayless: A bleh player that he signed.
7. Quincey Pondexter: An ok rotation guy until you mention that he traded Greives Vasquez for him who is significantly better.
That's the team and basically only a couple of the key pieces were signs of positive GM skill from Wallace. I won't even bother to mention all of the crappy moves he's made over his career.
Listen, I'd love to be wrong and write off all of the bad moves or give him credit for things he didn't mean to do. But this team has a remarkably short window to get things right. Bring in the wrong GM and he makes a few Wallace type moves and the fanbase's honeymoon period will end quickly.