It's early, but anybody have a draft wish list yet?

Who is the last good PF with only .500 from the floor as 3rd or 4th option in college, ok, lets take only his shots inside the arc which jumps to .527 and last year he was .461. Better teammates, better efficiency. He's not a very good finisher, his only real move is straight line drive which are rare. Jones is neither quick, or skilled enough to be a full time SF. In the end he doesn't project to be better than JT.
I think Jones is going to prove you wrong on this one. Obviously he is not going to be a prototypical wing but this kid has a really high upside because of his size/strength and playmaking abilities. It's no secret his outside shooting needs work but overall his game is really nice.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
I can understand why some don't love Henson at 6. I would for reasons previously mentioned, but I can understand those who don't like him as much as I do.

But Jones? I don't think that would be much of a reach at 6.
I agree on Jones. Of course it would depend on who else is available, but I've always liked Jones. He can play two positions, SF & PF. Very good defender who will block his share of shots. He has an NBA body, and plays with intensity. He tends to drift off every once in a while when he's not involved in a play, but he's really improved in that area. By drift off, I mean become a spectator instead of a participant. I think he's definitely top ten talent.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
Yeah, I missed the first couple of games where Miller played with-out PJ3. With that said, I thought Miller played solid basketball the entire year, and was a more consistant player than PJ3.
I think that PJ3 clearly has an advantage in both skill and athleticism, but Miller got better results.
Which is why I don't want PJ3 regardless of how tantalizing he might be. (And he first blew me away last year and it took his entire 2nd season to completely remove the shine and convince me that he isn't a safe pick)

Miller never blew me away, but I thought he did a great job of finding himself tough rebounds in traffic, and he showed a pretty consistent jump-shot, and some post game.
I also know he was coming off an injury (believe it was ACL) and that he was working through the whole recovery thing, so he might show more pronounced athleticism in the combine and next year after he gets mentally/emotionally gets past the injury.

So I don't know where I would place Miller at the moment in terms of SFs. He's probably in the discussion with Ross, Taylor, Harkless who are behind MKG, and perhaps to some slightly behind Barnes.

Considering where we will be picking there are three SFs that I like and would be comfortable picking up.
MKG is clearly #1 and should be a top 5 pick.
I have Barnes and Taylor even and both will probably be available where we pick if MKG is off the board.
I watched Vanderbilt play about 15 times this year, and about as many times last year due to Taylor (who I had never heard of till last year), and this year he improved his game to the point that I'd be comfortable picking him up if MKG is off the board. (Will never happen though)

I watched Washington play a lot, mostly due to Tony Wroten, who I think is a left-handed clone of Tyreke Evans. So I saw a lot of Ross, but he didn't stand out to me as much as Taylor did (especially on the defensive end) as far as SFs behind MKG & Barnes.
Absolutely perfect description of Wroten. I think he's a little better athlete than Tyreke, but his game is almost identical. They're even around the same size. And to make the match even more perfect, Wroten has no outside shot either. I agree, we won't take Taylor as high as were picking, but if we did, I wouldn't be upset. I want no part of Perry Jones.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
I also want to mention that how we draft could end up depending on the positions of the players. Here is how I see the SFs as far as tendencies to cover other positions:
MKG: 3/4 (Elite defense)
Barnes: 3
Taylor: 3/2 (Elite defense)
Miller: 3/4
Ross: 3/2
T. Jones: 4/3

I think that MKG and Miller have the size and length to be full-time SFs while covering for PF on occasions.
I think that Taylor and Ross have the size and quickness to be full-time SFs while covering for the SG on occasions.
I think that Barnes is a single position SF. If I had to lean a direction I'd go with PF over SG, as he has great size for a SF and doesn't have near the lateral quickness of MKG or Taylor.
I think that T. Jones will probably end up playing more PF than SF, but could make SF work on a full-time basis on the right team.

I should also mention that I think that MKG actually has the quickness to guard most SGs, but I don't ever see a coach playing him at that position.
I think your analogy is spot on. Barnes is definitely a one position player, and thats SF. MKG is just a special player. There were times this past season when he guarded the other teams PG, and made it look easy. He doesn't just guard a player, he smothers them.
 
Would anyone here trade IT or Jimmer for another first round pick this draft? And who would you take?

I think there's too much potential between IT and Jimmer to be sharing minutes as back-ups. Yes, IT in my opinion is purely a back-up PG. So I'd rather trade one of them with one of our overpriced bench at draft day.

My interest would be on any team that picks Royce White coz we definitely need another big who will score when Cousin sits and Ezeli coz he's big and love's defense. Thoughts?
 
Would anyone here trade IT or Jimmer for another first round pick this draft? And who would you take?

I think there's too much potential between IT and Jimmer to be sharing minutes as back-ups. Yes, IT in my opinion is purely a back-up PG. So I'd rather trade one of them with one of our overpriced bench at draft day.

My interest would be on any team that picks Royce White coz we definitely need another big who will score when Cousin sits and Ezeli coz he's big and love's defense. Thoughts?
A speedy pg is a essential part of a competitive team starting or otherwise so I won't make that trade. Jimmer can be part of a trade to net us another 1st rounder even if it's 10-14 because kendall marshall could be there and then we have two pg's to run an offense.
 
Jeremy Lamb to me is also a guy people are absolutely nuts if he's not atleast in the top 10, and personally i'd have him closer to top 5.

He got elite measurements at the SG position - he's a great shooter and shown the ability to do so with or without the ball - mainly without the ball which is a skill he does extremely well and is one of the surefire things to translate in the next level.

He has very good handle and improved much on that(another very positive note for a young man, actually addresses what he needs to work on in the summer and goes on to do it) - can create his own shot in many ways and creates elite separation from his defender using every inch of his length and athletic ability to get clean shots with his crossovers, step backs etc.

The knock on him is just that he doesn't really attack the rim, and that he shy away from the game - Well, I saw this kid in the U-19 world championship, and let me tell you this - this kid is a cold blooded killer. he took every big shot, demanded the ball, was THE MAN, did everything to get his team to win and carried them on his back.

About the attacking the rim thing - he will need to bulk up a little more - but again he's an elite prospect from size/length/athletic ability prospective - and he also had to play with some of the worst PGs a scorer can ever play with in collage, something that hurt him alot more then it did Drummond imo.

To me, he's an elite talent. people who picks him 14th like he's projected in many places are absolutely positively nuts and out of their minds.
 

Kingster

Hall of Famer
I meant two guard as in two guard positions. Point Guard AND Shooting Guard. That is where I want Tyreke to play almost exclusively. He joins Thornton/Salmons/Garcia/Thomas/Jimmer .. that's 6 players for two spots in the lineup (although Garcia and Salmons can play the 3 some, which is why I didn't include them originally). And then if we retain Terrence Williams ... I just think we have guard (both PG and SG) covered for next season. No need to tinker with it unless we are TRADING one of them... I certainly don't want to add one.

If we did some massive clearing out, then sure, go after a guard in the draft .. I just don't think it will happen and I'm not sure if I want it to happen. We aren't THAT far away. I do think that one of Thomas-Evans-Thornton will be traded, or Thornton will go to the bench next season .. good luck talking him into that one though. The reason I don't want to trade Evans for a 3 is because that means you are conceding PG and SG to Thornton and Thomas, which is not something I want to see. They just don't have the size. It wouldn't work.

And there is some danger trading away proven players to make room for rookies. I hated the Beno move that was made to basically make playing time for Jimmer (that Thomas eventually stole).

So the short answer is no (sort of) .. I wouldn't trade Evans just to make room for a shooting guard that is available in THIS draft. I don't think any of them are worth a Tyreke move right now, but that's hard to say for sure without seeing the deal.
You wouldn't give up Tyreke for a guard in this draft. You'd trade him for a two-way player of value at the 3 or the 4. Then replace him at the 2 with a guard in this draft, one that could shoot outside and defend. Then you have a synergistic team, not a mismash of incoherent parts. But, like you say, it all depends on who that player is who we would get in return for Tyreke.
 
Jeremy Lamb to me is also a guy people are absolutely nuts if he's not atleast in the top 10, and personally i'd have him closer to top 5.

He got elite measurements at the SG position - he's a great shooter and shown the ability to do so with or without the ball - mainly without the ball which is a skill he does extremely well and is one of the surefire things to translate in the next level.

He has very good handle and improved much on that(another very positive note for a young man, actually addresses what he needs to work on in the summer and goes on to do it) - can create his own shot in many ways and creates elite separation from his defender using every inch of his length and athletic ability to get clean shots with his crossovers, step backs etc.

The knock on him is just that he doesn't really attack the rim, and that he shy away from the game - Well, I saw this kid in the U-19 world championship, and let me tell you this - this kid is a cold blooded killer. he took every big shot, demanded the ball, was THE MAN, did everything to get his team to win and carried them on his back.

About the attacking the rim thing - he will need to bulk up a little more - but again he's an elite prospect from size/length/athletic ability prospective - and he also had to play with some of the worst PGs a scorer can ever play with in collage, something that hurt him alot more then it did Drummond imo.

To me, he's an elite talent. people who picks him 14th like he's projected in many places are absolutely positively nuts and out of their minds.
The kid has talent but I would be suprised to see him go that early some mock's have him in the mid-late end of the 1st round but you never know.
 
Lamb's main problem is lack of strength. That's why you rarely see him in paint. His shooting abilities are severely underrated though. LAmb shot 60% on 2-point attempts. It's not that rare feat by itself until you realise he doesn't get many at the rim. He's excellent at creating separation and shooting over defenders with his length (he has 7'4" wingspan). Basically Lamb is Durant of SGs. He will score a lot. But he needs to get a lot stronger to be a much better rebounder and defender. Lamb is probably training at some pre-draft academy so he's getting professional physical training and by June we should have a general idea how much stronger will he eventually be.
 
A speedy pg is a essential part of a competitive team starting or otherwise so I won't make that trade. Jimmer can be part of a trade to net us another 1st rounder even if it's 10-14 because kendall marshall could be there and then we have two pg's to run an offense.
I would gladly swap Jimmer for Doron Lamb.
 
On the subject of Terrance Jones, I think he probably has to play SF in the NBA. Gerald Wallace is the last 6'8" or under perimeter-oriented wing player that I can remember thriving at the PF spot and that was on some pretty terrible Bobcats teams that didn't win very much. They didn't start winning until they brought in enough frontcourt players to push Wallace to SF.

Jones had an up-and-down season, but I think he's a little more skilled than you give him credit for. Maybe not the protoypical NBA wing player who can create their own shots, but I can see him settling in somewhere in sortof an early Tayshaun Prince role where he gets almost all of his points either spotting up or finishing at the basket and makes his mark more on the defensive end. It took years for the in-between game to fill in for Tayshaun but that crazy length he has made him pretty formidible as a wing defender and also sneakily effective driving to the basket and lobbing it up over defenders, and I think that's where Terrance Jones is headed. I'd be very happy to get him if I were a late lottery team maybe on the verge of making the playoffs and who knows, maybe that's who we actually are if we ever get this mess of a rotation sorted out.
Josh Smith is only 6'7 w/o shoes.
 
L

LWP777

Guest
Lamb's main problem is lack of strength. That's why you rarely see him in paint. His shooting abilities are severely underrated though. LAmb shot 60% on 2-point attempts. It's not that rare feat by itself until you realise he doesn't get many at the rim. He's excellent at creating separation and shooting over defenders with his length (he has 7'4" wingspan). Basically Lamb is Durant of SGs. He will score a lot. But he needs to get a lot stronger to be a much better rebounder and defender. Lamb is probably training at some pre-draft academy so he's getting professional physical training and by June we should have a general idea how much stronger will he eventually be.

Wow. 60% from 2 point range is impressive considering, like you said, he doesn't get to the hole much. Durant was considered very weak when he first came in the league too. This kid sounds interesting....
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
Wow. 60% from 2 point range is impressive considering, like you said, he doesn't get to the hole much. Durant was considered very weak when he first came in the league too. This kid sounds interesting....
I agree with Gilles on this one. Lamb, the Doron lamb, and not the Jeremy Lamb, although they both play the same position, is highly underrated. He's a very good spot up shooter, and downright deadly from midrange. And as stated, he doesn't go to the rack much. He handles the ball well, and usually filled in for Teague at the PG spot when Teague went to the bench. I'am not, by any means implying that Doron can play PG in the NBA, but I'am saying he's a pretty good ballhandler and passer, who can bring the ball up the court on occasion and take some of the pressure off the PG. He's a team guy that, at least in college, just let the game come to him and seldom demanded the ball. In many games he was sort of a quiet assassin.

Some team at the bottom of the first round, like the Lakers, or the Spurs will end up with him, and in a few years we'll be wondering why he wasn't taken higher.
 
Think he ment Jeremy Lamb on the last post - but anyways I agree on both accounts as I stated in the last few pages.

Doron and Jeremy Lamb are highly underrated in their respected projections imo - Doron is one of the safest bets in this draft and for sure a bubble lottary to late teens pick - and Jeremy imo is a top 5 talent and should not go any lower then top 10.

Doron Lamb like I said I think is a Jason Terry ceiling kind of player but with a very high floor - and Jeremy Lamb in my honest opinion - is one of the few people in this draft who I can say has superstar potential.

Jeremy stock was hurt cause of the tournament and cause of his PGs - His combination of elite length(7'4 as mentioned, ridiculous on all accounts) - elite athletic ability, and elite shooting ability mainly from an off the ball position but also from off the dribble creating to himself - is just very rare.
 
I agree with Gilles on this one. Lamb, the Doron lamb, and not the Jeremy Lamb, although they both play the same position, is highly underrated. He's a very good spot up shooter, and downright deadly from midrange. And as stated, he doesn't go to the rack much. He handles the ball well, and usually filled in for Teague at the PG spot when Teague went to the bench. I'am not, by any means implying that Doron can play PG in the NBA, but I'am saying he's a pretty good ballhandler and passer, who can bring the ball up the court on occasion and take some of the pressure off the PG. He's a team guy that, at least in college, just let the game come to him and seldom demanded the ball. In many games he was sort of a quiet assassin.

Some team at the bottom of the first round, like the Lakers, or the Spurs will end up with him, and in a few years we'll be wondering why he wasn't taken higher.
Doron Lamb is the sort of guy you play at point if you want Tyreke to be your lead guard. He will struggle strengthwise on defense as SG like Kevin Martin.
 
Alright, make that 2 exceptions but does anyone see Atlanta getting past the second round with Josh Smith at PF and Al Horford at C? It doesn't look likely to me.
Well, we don't have an Al Horford at C, so it's not a problem. I'm willing to bet though that Jones measures taller, longer, and heavier than Smith at the combine.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
Doron Lamb is the sort of guy you play at point if you want Tyreke to be your lead guard. He will struggle strengthwise on defense as SG like Kevin Martin.
Yeah, that would be the perfect kind of fit for him. I do think he's bigger than Kevin when he came to the team. Of course Kevin was taller and longer. But I get your point.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
Well, we don't have an Al Horford at C, so it's not a problem. I'm willing to bet though that Jones measures taller, longer, and heavier than Smith at the combine.
Two years ago at the skills academy, Jones measured out at 6'9" in shoes with a 7'2" wingspan. To the best of my knowledge, those measurements usually stand up, and if they're wrong, its usually because the player has grown a little since being measured. I have little doubt that Jones is at least 6'9" in shoes. I also have little doubt that he can play PF in the NBA. His offense needs tweaking, but defensively he can contribute right away. I think people are going to be surprised by his athletic markers coming out of the combine.
 

Kingster

Hall of Famer
Jeremy Lamb to me is also a guy people are absolutely nuts if he's not atleast in the top 10, and personally i'd have him closer to top 5.

He got elite measurements at the SG position - he's a great shooter and shown the ability to do so with or without the ball - mainly without the ball which is a skill he does extremely well and is one of the surefire things to translate in the next level.

He has very good handle and improved much on that(another very positive note for a young man, actually addresses what he needs to work on in the summer and goes on to do it) - can create his own shot in many ways and creates elite separation from his defender using every inch of his length and athletic ability to get clean shots with his crossovers, step backs etc.

The knock on him is just that he doesn't really attack the rim, and that he shy away from the game - Well, I saw this kid in the U-19 world championship, and let me tell you this - this kid is a cold blooded killer. he took every big shot, demanded the ball, was THE MAN, did everything to get his team to win and carried them on his back.

About the attacking the rim thing - he will need to bulk up a little more - but again he's an elite prospect from size/length/athletic ability prospective - and he also had to play with some of the worst PGs a scorer can ever play with in collage, something that hurt him alot more then it did Drummond imo.

To me, he's an elite talent. people who picks him 14th like he's projected in many places are absolutely positively nuts and out of their minds.
I'm very high on J. Lamb and would be very pleased if he was picked by the Kings. I agree with everything you say, and I think he has a high BB IQ, a good feel for the game. If I compare Barnes to J. Lamb, Lamb wins without a doubt.
 
Last edited:

Kingster

Hall of Famer
Lamb's main problem is lack of strength. That's why you rarely see him in paint. His shooting abilities are severely underrated though. LAmb shot 60% on 2-point attempts. It's not that rare feat by itself until you realise he doesn't get many at the rim. He's excellent at creating separation and shooting over defenders with his length (he has 7'4" wingspan). Basically Lamb is Durant of SGs. He will score a lot. But he needs to get a lot stronger to be a much better rebounder and defender. Lamb is probably training at some pre-draft academy so he's getting professional physical training and by June we should have a general idea how much stronger will he eventually be.
I'll take the Durant of SGs any day!;)
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
I'm very high on J. Lam and would be very pleased if he was picked by the Kings. I agree with everything you say, and I think he has a high BB IQ, a good feel for the game. If I compare Barnes to J. Lam, Lam wins without a doubt.
J. Lamb is one of my favorite players, and the main reason I watched UCONN this year. It started out as the Drummond watch, but that ended quickly. I've been pretty hard on Drummond, and to be fair, I think he can play in the NBA on the defensive side of the ball once he gets up to speed. How long that will take is anyone's guess. Not sure about his BBIQ. The guy is loaded with talent, and on a scale of 1 to 10, if Drummond is a 10, Thabeet is a 1 talent wise. Maybe that puts it in prespective..

I have Lamb ahead of Barnes on my mock. I don't have a problem drafting him, but if we do, someone has to go.
 

Kingster

Hall of Famer
J. Lamb is one of my favorite players, and the main reason I watched UCONN this year. It started out as the Drummond watch, but that ended quickly. I've been pretty hard on Drummond, and to be fair, I think he can play in the NBA on the defensive side of the ball once he gets up to speed. How long that will take is anyone's guess. Not sure about his BBIQ. The guy is loaded with talent, and on a scale of 1 to 10, if Drummond is a 10, Thabeet is a 1 talent wise. Maybe that puts it in prespective..

I have Lamb ahead of Barnes on my mock. I don't have a problem drafting him, but if we do, someone has to go.
I'd prefer it if someone got traded before the draft, or even during the draft, but not after the draft. Having a zillion 2/3s isn't exactly conducive to trading leverage.
 
One thing I'm sure of in this draft is that I want us to get Will Barton, I'm really high on him. I doubt he'll stay in the second round where he's currently projected, but if we can get him with our second or an acquired late first, that would be awesome.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
One thing I'm sure of in this draft is that I want us to get Will Barton, I'm really high on him. I doubt he'll stay in the second round where he's currently projected, but if we can get him with our second or an acquired late first, that would be awesome.
Vlade, I really like Barton. So this has nothing to do with my liking or disliking him. It has to do with having enough players that are 6'6" SG's on the team. I can stomach taking a Beal or a Lamb with our first pick if that player is the BPA. But I just can see us taking another SG in the second round. This team needs size and athleticism. I would love someone like Festus Ezeli in the second round. Unfortunately once he gets to team workouts, I think he'll slide into the bottom of the first round. But someone like Withey should be there when we pick, and I'd love to have him. And as I said, none of this has to do with how I feel about Barton.

My dream was to get either Davis or MGK. The chances are severely diminished now, but still possible. Tell you what, if we get lucky and still get one of those guys, I'll choose anyone you want in the second round.
 
Before college season started everybody talked how great this draft would be. Greatness talks cooled off as season went along but it's clear that this will be a very deep draft with players who stayed for another year because of lockout or will be screwed by new NCAA regulations. So saying guys who have concerns will move up is premature. Ezeli is constantly injured and Barton is not skilled enough for SG/not big or strong enough for SF. So Kings will probably get someone decent even in early second round. I feel #30s this year are worth #20s in recent years. Just have to find your diamond in rough and more importantly with this team find playing time to develop him.
 
Vlade, I really like Barton. So this has nothing to do with my liking or disliking him. It has to do with having enough players that are 6'6" SG's on the team. I can stomach taking a Beal or a Lamb with our first pick if that player is the BPA. But I just can see us taking another SG in the second round. This team needs size and athleticism. I would love someone like Festus Ezeli in the second round. Unfortunately once he gets to team workouts, I think he'll slide into the bottom of the first round. But someone like Withey should be there when we pick, and I'd love to have him. And as I said, none of this has to do with how I feel about Barton.

My dream was to get either Davis or MGK. The chances are severely diminished now, but still possible. Tell you what, if we get lucky and still get one of those guys, I'll choose anyone you want in the second round.
How often to 2nd round picks just get let go and fade away into nothing? BPA is even more important in the second round. It's no time to get picky when you're just trying to get anything of value there.
 
Before college season started everybody talked how great this draft would be. Greatness talks cooled off as season went along but it's clear that this will be a very deep draft with players who stayed for another year because of lockout or will be screwed by new NCAA regulations. So saying guys who have concerns will move up is premature. Ezeli is constantly injured and Barton is not skilled enough for SG/not big or strong enough for SF. So Kings will probably get someone decent even in early second round. I feel #30s this year are worth #20s in recent years. Just have to find your diamond in rough and more importantly with this team find playing time to develop him.
Barton is one of those guys though that do tend to rise though, being a sophomore and someone who will probably impress in the combine. If he doesn't though, great.