[Game] Kings @ Sixers 10/01/12

I am neutral on Jimmer - absolutely NO preconceived opinion about him.

I can say, with serious objectivity, that there's something wrong with him.
He drove to the basket, brought THREE defenders to him, had TWO (not one - TWO!) Kings hovering on the 3-pt line, waiting for the clear pass, and Jimmer shot the ball. Well, tried to shoot - he got blocked by TWO defenders.

If somebody would have told me a professional would do that, in garbage time, it would be hard to believe.
I mean - Outlaw was right across the court from Jimmer - he HAD to have seen him standing there waiting for the pass.
Maybe he's getting payback for all the times he got ignored when he was open.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
Donte actually finished a ****ing break with a dunk, and hit a wide-open 3.

That's all I had to see - start him over this in-a-funk Salmons. He's hurting the team WAY too much right now to overlook Donte THAT much.

At the VERY least, give Donte more minutes and give him a chance to show if he can do that when it matters.
Ridiculous as it may seem, I actually agree with this. We really aren't asking much form our SFs, and they can't even give that to us.

Problem is from a management standpoint after intentionally getting Salmons are they going to tolerate us having $28 million of SFs sitting on the bench behind Donte, who they kind of gave up on?
 
I wouldnt call cousins an "excellent post player"... yet. Hes got nice moves but hes just not that great at finishing yet.
Sure, that part of his game could use some work. I think he is a much better finisher than the number suggest though. He has a huge number of tips that kill his FG%, but you are right .. he needs to finish better.

Relatively speaking though .. He is one of the better post players in the league... A league that doesn't have many of them.
 
Reke and Cousins would start for just about every team. Playoff teams for the most part have good coaches, and coaches who'd not only run a better offense than we're seeing, but use both more effectively.
Start yes. But there's a big difference between starting on a good team and being the first or second option on a good team. Can anyone really say that Evans or Cousins would be an option over Kobe/Gasol, Westbrook/Durant, Stoudamire/Anthony, Wade/LeBron, Dirk/Kidd, Randolph/Gasol, etc.? Heck, they wouldn't even be the third option on most of those teams. That's just the cold hard truth. Maybe in two years, three years, etc. that will change but as it stands now, no.
 
Last edited:
The time is now for a major starting lineup overhaul..
I propose the following:

C: Jason Thompson
PF: Demarcus Cousins
SF: Tyreke Evans
SG: Marcus Thornton
PG: Isaiah Thomas

I might be crazy for the SF and PG choice...but I doubt we'd get beat by 20-30 every night...at least Thomas is a pure point guard(even as young as hevis, probably a better choice)and Tyreke is big enough to play SF in my opinion.
 
See, I got accused of being a troll for saying that (to me) obvious observation.

Even having a discussion about the Kings and asking who would start on a good team was so heinous the thread was locked.

Well, this right here is what you get - a team that has no business competing on the court if even one or two players are out or having bad games.
Telling it like it is is often mistaken for trolling. Some folks just don't want to face reality. It's easier to dismiss the "troll" than it is to reassess their own evaluations of this team.
 
I've been screaming for Donte to get more minutes since he got in the league, and as strange as it is I think THIS team is the best kind of team for him.

He doesn't really have to do anything he can't do. For once. His shooting has been just as good/bad as the rest of our junk 3's .. and his defense is better than Salmons in my opinion.

The idea was to bring in a SF who could give us defense and offense .. not one or the other. Well, on this team that starts FIVE offensive players right now, Donte Greene the role player could help. I repeat, could.

He would help with weak side defense / blocked shots. He's always been a good finisher on the break because he runs the floor every time giving us easy lob options or trailing dunks. And as long as he gets minutes he doesn't play selfishly. Would I give him a shot? yea, no doubt. But no coach he has ever had believed in him .. so I wouldn't get my hopes up.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
Start yes. But there's a big difference between starting a good team and being the first or second option on a good team. Can anyone really say that Evans or Cousins would be an option over Kobe/Gasol, Westbrook/Durant, Stoudamire/Anthony, Wade/LeBron, Dirk/Kidd, Randolph/Gasol, etc.? Heck, they wouldn't even be the third option on most of those teams. That's just the cold hard truth. Maybe in two years, three years, etc. that will change but as it stands now, no.
And the same thing could be said about most of those guys early in their careers. Reke and Cousins are well on their way to being that similar level of player. Just takes time once you have the talent. They aren't losing us these games now. Talk to the other guys.
 
Start yes. But there's a big difference between starting a good team and being the first or second option on a good team. Can anyone really say that Evans or Cousins would be an option over Kobe/Gasol, Westbrook/Durant, Stoudamire/Anthony, Wade/LeBron, Dirk/Kidd, Randolph/Gasol, etc.? Heck, they wouldn't even be the third option on most of those teams. That's just the cold hard truth. Maybe in two years, three years, etc. that will change but as it stands now, no.
Obviously they aren't as seasoned/experienced as the top 5-7 duo's in the league.

I simply said they'd start for just about every team, and many playoff teams. I didn't say, and don't remember others saying, right now they're more productive than the duo's you listed. As a young team, most of us figure development/talent into the equation. That's why I think they'll get there.

But you're saying it;s the cold hard truth that right now Kobe/Gasol or Wade/Lebron are better? Who suggested otherwise?
 
The time is now for a major starting lineup overhaul..
I propose the following:

C: Jason Thompson
PF: Demarcus Cousins
SF: Tyreke Evans
SG: Marcus Thornton
PG: Isaiah Thomas

I might be crazy for the SF and PG choice...but I doubt we'd get beat by 20-30 every night...at least Thomas is a pure point guard(even as young as hevis, probably a better choice)and Tyreke is big enough to play SF in my opinion.
Id' go with

C - Cousins
PF - Thompson
SF - Greene
SG - Thornton
PG - Evans

Salmons backs-up the SG
Outlaw backs-up the SF, followed by Garcia
Fredette and Thomas should just play PG and never together or never put Fredette as SG.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
Telling it like it is is often mistaken for trolling. Some folks just don't want to face reality. It's easier to dismiss the "troll" than it is to reassess their own evaluations of this team.
Trying to claim none of the Kings players would start on a good team is trolling. There's not a team in the league that at least one of guys wouldn't start on. And we're not going down that stupid route again or I will lock the next thread too. People need to learn to hold their water.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
Id' go with

C - Cousins
PF - Thompson
SF - Greene
SG - Thornton
PG - Evans

Salmons backs-up the SG
Outlaw backs-up the SF, followed by Garcia
Fredette and Thomas should just play PG and never together or never put Fredette as SG.
Be my lineup too. Maybe start Ciso or Salmons at Sg until Thronton gets back. Get back our size and roleplayers.
 
Id' go with

C - Cousins
PF - Thompson
SF - Greene
SG - Thornton
PG - Evans

Salmons backs-up the SG
Outlaw backs-up the SF, followed by Garcia
Fredette and Thomas should just play PG and never together or never put Fredette as SG.
I'm cool with Donte at SF...I don't want Salmons backing up anyone at this point...he is now Kenny Thomas, IMO. I just REALLY think the Tyreke experiement at PG is over.
 
I just think the Tyreke PG experiment has run its course...its not working.
Funny you say that, and don't mention how the guys he's constantly setting up and miss their shots, aren't working.

Reke shot 6/13 tonight, and set up his teammates numerous times, only to see them miss one after another. Yet he's a larger problem then his teammates?
 
But you're saying it;s the cold hard truth that right now Kobe/Gasol or Wade/Lebron are better? Who suggested otherwise?
Who suggested no one on the Kings would start on a good team? I was just pointing out that no one on the Kings would be a first or second option on a good team. I was just making a point, I never claimed that anyone said otherwise. You then responded by saying they would start which had nothing to do with anything i said.
 
The time is now for a major starting lineup overhaul..
I propose the following:

C: Jason Thompson
PF: Demarcus Cousins
SF: Tyreke Evans
SG: Marcus Thornton
PG: Isaiah Thomas

I might be crazy for the SF and PG choice...but I doubt we'd get beat by 20-30 every night...at least Thomas is a pure point guard(even as young as hevis, probably a better choice)and Tyreke is big enough to play SF in my opinion.
I am with you on Jason Thompson. I wanted him starting day 1 after the Hayes contract got voided, and I wanted him starting once Hayes got hurt because he is more of a role player than Hickson. I wouldn't start Thomas though. I'd rather go big and start Greene at SF.

Evans/Thomas
Thornton/Jimmer
Greene/Salmons
Thompson/Hickson
Cousins/Hickson

Thats what I would do. And until Jimmer plays better, I'd give Thomas Jimmer's minutes and Jimmer the 4th guard minutes. I never want to see Outlaw again. Cisco may get some burn here and there. Possibly over Jimmer is he continues to struggle.

This teams second unit just couldn't score tonight. With Hickson/Salmons/Thomas running the show they should at least be able to put some points on the board.
 
Id' go with

C - Cousins
PF - Thompson
SF - Greene
SG - Thornton
PG - Evans

Salmons backs-up the SG
Outlaw backs-up the SF, followed by Garcia
Fredette and Thomas should just play PG and never together or never put Fredette as SG.
I'd do that if we had Fesenko!

But seriously, the problem with that is JJ is the worst of the three at defense, and if Cousins/JT get into foul trouble, we don't have anyone who can fill in at center.
 
And the same thing could be said about most of those guys early in their careers. Reke and Cousins are well on their way to being that similar level of player. Just takes time once you have the talent. They aren't losing us these games now. Talk to the other guys.
How long do we keep saying well on their way? Durant/Westbrook didn't take this long. I see this a really important year for the Kings in terns of Tyrekle and DeMarcus. If we're still saying "they're well on their way" going into next year then we're in trouble.
 
I am with you on Jason Thompson. I wanted him starting day 1 after the Hayes contract got voided, and I wanted him starting once Hayes got hurt because he is more of a role player than Hickson. I wouldn't start Thomas though. I'd rather go big and start Greene at SF.

Evans/Thomas
Thornton/Jimmer
Greene/Salmons
Thompson/Hickson
Cousins/Hickson

Thats what I would do. And until Jimmer plays better, I'd give Thomas Jimmer's minutes and Jimmer the 4th guard minutes. I never want to see Outlaw again. Cisco may get some burn here and there. Possibly over Jimmer is he continues to struggle.

This teams second unit just couldn't score tonight. With Hickson/Salmons/Thomas running the show they should at least be able to put some points on the board.
I'm cool with that lineup...and couldn't agree more about Outlaw...he needs to be right next to Salmons non-producing butt right on the end of the bench.
 
WHOA!

Keith Smart just threw the strength-and-conditioning coach (Shapiro) under the bus!!

He answered that "the reason we don't get back on transitional defense is because they aren't in shape - and that they're going to get in shape."

Uh - I don't know of anyone else involved in the Kings' players conditioning and stamina, other than Shapiro.

Can anyone else imagine who else is to blame for the Kings players being admitted by the coach to across-the-board not be in shape?
The players for not doing the exercise needed?
Management, for tying Shapiro's hands and not allowing him to FORCE the guys to do cardio?
What else?

Maybe I'm projecting here, because I've wanted Shapiro gone for a long time and I can't stand that after YEARS of Kings teams that are in worse shape and have more injuries than other teams, yet he still gets a complete pass.
But I don't see who else is to blame for this situation - that Coach Smart can't rely on his players to get back on defense during the game because "they aren't in good shape."
 
Trying to claim none of the Kings players would start on a good team is trolling. There's not a team in the league that at least one of guys wouldn't start on. And we're not going down that stupid route again or I will lock the next thread too. People need to learn to hold their water.
No it isn't. A legitimate argument can be made than no one on this team would start on a team like the Bulls. You can "lock threads" all you like but it really just looks kind of silly, like you can't handle dissenting opinions.
 
I just think the Tyreke PG experiment has run its course...its not working.

The seems to be not working because we never really utilized the Reke size and quickness advantage as it should be utilized.
We put Thornton next to Evans so he can bully the team's PG if they put their SG on Reke. But in the Orlando game, Thornton never posted up little Jameer.
Now in this Philly game, we put Fredette next to Evans and other teams easily put their PG to guard Jimmer. If Smart moved Salmons to SG and started Greene at SF, we could have gained a lot of size advantage in this game.
 
I'd do that if we had Fesenko!

But seriously, the problem with that is JJ is the worst of the three at defense, and if Cousins/JT get into foul trouble, we don't have anyone who can fill in at center.
I understand the logic here, but the odds we win a game are pretty low. Then add in the odds we win a game when both JT and Cousins are in foul trouble and it gets even lower. I'm not too worried about defense at that point.

But damn, I'd take Fesenko. He'd be a great fourth big. Could cause some 'what is my role on the team?' problems once Hayes gets back though. But thinking long term, I find it very likely one of JT or JJ gets dealt before the deadline this year... So it could all work itself out.
 
Who suggested no one on the Kings would start on a good team? I was just pointing out that no one on the Kings would be a first or second option on a good team. I was just making a point, I never claimed that anyone said otherwise. You then responded by saying they would start which had nothing to do with anything i said.
I responded to another poster who brought up his thread getting locked for suggesting no one on our team would start for a good team. That is who I responded to.

Then you quoted me with this:
Start yes. But there's a big difference between starting a good team and being the first or second option on a good team. Can anyone really say that Evans or Cousins would be an option over Kobe/Gasol, Westbrook/Durant, Stoudamire/Anthony, Wade/LeBron, Dirk/Kidd, Randolph/Gasol, etc.? Heck, they wouldn't even be the third option on most of those teams. That's just the cold hard truth. Maybe in two years, three years, etc. that will change but as it stands now, no.
This implies someone actually said our duo is better than the ones you included. You said it's the cold hard truth. To who? Your statement implies you're educating people who thought that. So who are you educating? Who said that? Most people don't say "cold hard truth" unless they're in a disagreement with someone.
 
I responded to another poster who brought up his thread getting locked for suggesting no one on our team would start for a good team. That is who I responded to.

Then you quoted me with this:


This implies someone actually said our duo is better than the ones you included. You said it's the cold hard truth. To who? Your statement implies you're educating people who thought that. So who are you educating? Who said that? Most people don't say "cold hard truth" unless they're in a disagreement with someone.
I never claimed anyone said it. If you're reading it that way, that's an error on your part.
 
Trying to claim none of the Kings players would start on a good team is trolling.
Good thing that's not what I argued or said in that thread - that's what was manipulated by others, including yourself.

I said (and I can quote if you'd like) that outside of Marcus Thornton, and with the exclusion of Tyreke and DMC because of their youth and other factors, who on the Kings is a reliable NBA-quality starter?

And I was attacked and labelled a troll for it.
That's reality - not retconning, or monday-morning quarterbacking.

KF's were WRONG on that thread, and ignoring that is not going to make the Kings problems go away - they don't have a competitive team on the court, because outside of MT, Tyreke and DMC when they are playing well, they don't have anyone who can step up and significantly compete on a night-to-night basis.

Trading away the ONLY proven King who could (Beno, undeniably with years of proof on the Kings court) was a HUGE mistake we are now blatantly seeing.

Apologies should be in order, to be honest : KF's was WRONG. I was RIGHT, based on proven performances on the court thus far this year.
 

gunks

Hall of Famer
How long do we keep saying well on their way? Durant/Westbrook didn't take this long. I see this a really important year for the Kings in terns of Tyrekle and DeMarcus. If we're still saying "they're well on their way" going into next year then we're in trouble.
Well....For Reke, last season was a bust. He had injuries that pretty much made the whole year a wash, as for Cousins, dude is just in his second year! And he's showing improvement! Also, you cant disregard the fact that we had a HORRIBLE coach retarding the growth of the youngins.