Potential Free agent/trade/sign tracker

Tetsujin

The Game Thread Dude
Stein reporting the Kings have no interest in including Carter in a Cam deal is encouraging. The only option in moving youth/picks should be a mega deal of all of it, Keegan/picks included. And there really isn't anyone worth anything close to that right now though available or otherwise.
Right, the only guy really worthy of a mega deal I could see coming available in the next few months is KD but that’s a topic for another thread
 
Stein reporting the Kings have no interest in including Carter in a Cam deal is encouraging. The only option in moving youth/picks should be a mega deal of all of it, Keegan/picks included. And there really isn't anyone worth anything close to that right now though available or otherwise.
Trading Carter after waiting for him to get healthy was fantasy anyways the player that would’ve been traded was Keon but that ship has sailed with his recent play
 
If this team keeps playing this well, I’d probably opt for a minor move involving Hierter + a second for a backup center to even the roster out a bit. Richards, Valanciunas, and Collins, as previously discussed, would all be interesting options with different pros and cons. My preference would be Valanciunas.

Fox/Carter/McLaughlin
Monk/Ellis/Colby
DeRozan/Crowder
Murray/Lyles/Isaac/McDermott
Sabonis/Valanciunas/Len

Main rotation is starters + Keon, Devin, Lyles and Valanciunas.

You’re still short a wing, but having Keegan/Ellis/Carter and their versatility on defense could mask that deficiency enough short term to compete for a Playoff spot.
 
If that rumor of Cam Johnson is true and they are willing to give up Toppin and Nesmith plus a first ( I wouldn’t do it if I were Indiana) then why don’t we swoop in and increase our length and athleticism? Nesmith plays with force and can shoot and Obi gives us even more athleticism. We can play him at the back up 5 and then use Len when we need more size.

Fox Devin
Monk Ellis
Deebo Nesmith
Keegan Toppin
Sabonis Len

IMG_1023.jpeg
 
IMO that team could make some serious noise. We get longer and more athletic, the Nets only have to take on one contract and they get the 2 first rounders they want and the Pacers consolidate their forwards and secure playing time for their top ten pick from 2 years ago.
 
IMO that team could make some serious noise. We get longer and more athletic, the Nets only have to take on one contract and they get the 2 first rounders they want and the Pacers consolidate their forwards and secure playing time for their top ten pick from 2 years ago.
Thats an interesting enough proposal.
One thing I know is not really interested in making Keon or Devin available in trade scenarios. And as productive as Trey has been recently we have to give up something.
 
If this team keeps playing this well, I’d probably opt for a minor move involving Hierter + a second for a backup center to even the roster out a bit. Richards, Valanciunas, and Collins, as previously discussed, would all be interesting options with different pros and cons. My preference would be Valanciunas.

Fox/Carter/McLaughlin
Monk/Ellis/Colby
DeRozan/Crowder
Murray/Lyles/Isaac/McDermott
Sabonis/Valanciunas/Len

Main rotation is starters + Keon, Devin, Lyles and Valanciunas.

You’re still short a wing, but having Keegan/Ellis/Carter and their versatility on defense could mask that deficiency enough short term to compete for a Playoff spot.


Ya we need size and pen hasn’t been good
Two centers coke to mind would be Timelord and Jonas both I think can be had for seconds. Do you take the chance on Williams with his all nba defense potential or go for a sure thing in Jonas who would be great offensively. Either way our bench would be solid with the two guards and added size from a backup center
 


Ya we need size and pen hasn’t been good
Two centers coke to mind would be Timelord and Jonas both I think can be had for seconds. Do you take the chance on Williams with his all nba defense potential or go for a sure thing in Jonas who would be great offensively. Either way our bench would be solid with the two guards and added size from a backup center
The Len thing isn't totally fair because he had impact the game before. Against small ball teams he's obviously going to struggle. I still really don't get the idea of investing value and money in backup C. The minutes just aren't there. For almost any team. Yeah, the only big out there that I think could work because there is a history of court time together is Valanciunas. The Kings might be able to continue to squeeze more than the 7-8 minutes the backup C position is getting currently on the Kings.
 
The Len thing isn't totally fair because he had impact the game before. Against small ball teams he's obviously going to struggle. I still really don't get the idea of investing value and money in backup C. The minutes just aren't there. For almost any team. Yeah, the only big out there that I think could work because there is a history of court time together is Valanciunas. The Kings might be able to continue to squeeze more than the 7-8 minutes the backup C position is getting currently on the Kings.
Len’s -11 in the Warriors game is actually not telling at all. I love how people just use #’s without any regard to what happened on the court. Warriors / Curry went crazy from 3’ in Len’s run and he wasn’t even involved in the action being run. Would have happened regardless of what the backup center was out there.

Len has proved to be a reliable backup - an odd 3 or 7 minute stretch here or there is statistical variance at this point. Now if someone is actually analyzing tape and saying “hey if there was this xyz center in there, that wouldn’t happen offensively or defensively” then I’d listen but noticing very shallow analysis lately in critiquing players.

In fact I’d say Len is a better player right now than Valancunis. Jonas can’t guard at all, so you really want to trot him out there with Fox, DeRozan, Carter, & Lyles for example? (The unit Len is paired with as an example). How in 2025 people are blinded by counting stats is amazing to me. Jonas is a backup on the worst team in basketball right now.
 
Go over to a TWolves forum and propose that trade and let us know what happens.
Haha I was thinking the same thing.

In reality, Huerter is likely viewed as a negative value asset in a trade, and at best, he has neutral value (which I personally doubt). You’ll be hard pressed to find a team that wants to add a non-expiring, bench shooter that makes $17-18 mil who’s currently shooting 31.5% from three (4.4% lower than the league average). Especially under this new CBA and with how the aprons work.
 
I saw this trade proposal online and thought it was interesting...


LAL Gets: DeMar DeRozan
LAL Gives: Jarred Vanderbilt, Gabe Vincent, 2025 LAL 2nd, 2025 LAC 2nd, & 2026 LAL 1st Pick Swap
Why for LAL? Vanderbilt & Vincent haven't been contributing very much so they swap them with a major talent upgrade in DeRozan to help bolster their playoff chances. DeRozan gives them another creator/playmaker to add to LeBron and Reaves to help keep them afloat when those guys are resting.

MIA Gets: Brandon Ingram, Gabe Vincent, & 2025 LAL 2nd
MIA Gives: Jimmy Butler
Why for MIA? Adebayo is 27 and Herro is 24. Ingram at 27 gives them another core piece that can fit that timeline while getting rid of their Butler headache. They also get Vincent who once succeeded under Spoelstra and a mid-2nd rounder.

NOP Gets: Kevin Huerter, Jarred Vanderbilt, Future SAC 1st (2 yrs after Hawks pick coveys - Top 6 protected for 2 years, then one Future SAC 2nd), 2025 LAC 2nd, & 2026 LAL 1st Pick Swap
NOP Gives: Brandon Ingram
Why for NOP? The Pelicans get some value for Ingram without having to worry about resigning him. They take on some negative value contracts in Huerter and Vando, but they receive a protected first, a pick swap, and a 2nd round pick to add to their asset pool in an attempt to retool/rebuild.

SAC Gets: Jimmy Butler
SAC Gives: DeMar DeRozan, Kevin Huerter, & Future SAC 1st (2 yrs after Hawks pick coveys - Top 6 protected for 2 years, then one Future SAC 2nd)
Why for SAC? With Devin Carter back healthy, Huerter is the odd man out and becomes disposable. Butler gives them a big upgrade over DeRozan since he's a better shooter, better defender, and a more efficient scorer. Butler also has that tough guy mentality which might be what we need considering the Kings have a bunch of "nice" guys on the roster.




If we want to even consider bringing Butler to SAC, we need to have insight into if he would be excited/happy about coming to SAC. Even then, Butler has seemed to wear out his welcome for each team he has played for and it would be a shame to disrupt the locker room right now. However, he is 35 so maybe he'll end up retiring before wearing out his welcome in SAC ;).

In all seriousness though, I could see him enjoying playing for Doug Christie and I'm sure Christie would love having his toughness to lean on and help establish that “Christie” mentality for the team. Butler said in that interview that he has lost his joy and we have Christie on the record saying that we're about playing with joy and taking joy from the other team. That between Christie and Butler at least seems to align.

If Butler proves to workout personality wise with the team/locker room, he gives us a boost defensively and a much better 1-2 go-to scoring duo of Fox and Butler. Those two could do some damage in the playoffs when the game slows down and defenses tighten up.
 
Last edited:
Does ANYONE on this board want Jimmy Butler? I can't think of many worse moves/decisions personally.
I'd be open to it, but as a GM, I would need to have insight into how he would feel about coming to SAC before making a trade for him.

If he's excited about coming here, excited to play with Fox, Sabonis, etc., likes what he sees from Christie thus far, etc., then perhaps it makes sense. If he's wishy-washy about coming to SAC, then absolutely not.
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
I saw this trade proposal online and thought it was interesting...


LAL Gets: DeMar DeRozan
LAL Gives: Jarred Vanderbilt, Gabe Vincent, 2025 LAL 2nd, 2025 LAC 2nd, & 2026 LAL 1st Pick Swap
Why for LAL? Vanderbilt & Vincent haven't been contributing very much so they swap them with a major talent upgrade in DeRozan to help bolster their playoff chances. DeRozan gives them another creator/playmaker to add to LeBron and Reaves to help keep them afloat when those guys are resting.

MIA Gets: Brandon Ingram, Gabe Vincent, & 2025 LAL 2nd
MIA Gives: Jimmy Butler
Why for MIA? Adebayo is 27 and Herro is 24. Ingram at 27 gives them another core piece that can fit that timeline while getting rid of their Butler headache. They also get Vincent who once succeeded under Spoelstra and a mid-2nd rounder.

NOP Gets: Kevin Huerter, Jarred Vanderbilt, Future SAC 1st (2 yrs after Hawks pick coveys - Top 6 protected for 2 years, then one Future SAC 2nd), 2025 LAC 2nd, & 2026 LAL 1st Pick Swap
NOP Gives: Brandon Ingram
Why for NOP? The Pelicans get some value for Ingram without having to worry about resigning him. They take on some negative value contracts in Huerter and Vando, but they receive a protected first, a pick swap, and a 2nd round pick to add to their asset pool in an attempt to retool/rebuild.

SAC Gets: Jimmy Butler
SAC Gives: DeMar DeRozan, Kevin Huerter, & Future SAC 1st (2 yrs after Hawks pick coveys - Top 6 protected for 2 years, then one Future SAC 2nd)
Why for SAC? With Devin Carter back healthy, Huerter is the odd man out and becomes disposable. Butler gives them a big upgrade over DeRozan since he's a better shooter, better defender, and a more efficient scorer. Butler also has that tough guy mentality which might be what we need considering the Kings have a bunch of "nice" guys on the roster.




If we want to even consider bringing Butler to SAC, we need to have insight into if he would be excited/happy about coming to SAC. Even then, Butler has seemed to wear out his welcome for each team he has played for and it would be a shame to disrupt the locker room right now. However, he is 35 so maybe he'll end up retiring before wearing out his welcome in SAC ;).

In all seriousness though, I could see him enjoying playing for Doug Christie and I'm sure Christie would love having his toughness to lean on and help establish that “Christie” mentality for the team. Butler said in that interview that he has lost his joy and we have Christie on the record saying that we're about playing with joy and taking joy from the other team. That between Christie and Butler at least seems to align.

If Butler proves to workout personality wise with the team/locker room, he gives us a boost defensively and a much better 1-2 go-to scoring duo of Fox and Butler. Those two could do some damage in the playoffs when the game slows down and defenses tighten up.
If we were to take on Butler we'd better be receiving a slew of picks not giving one.
 
I wouldn’t want Jimmy Butler here. Swapping him in for DeRozan doesn’t move the needle that much if at all. We need a proper big man to pair with Sabonis and slide Keegan into a more traditional forward position. We would instantly get bigger/longer and it would really bring some balance to the roster. You can run Fox and Monk together in the starting lineup if you have Keegan, X, and Sabonis out there. Ideally a mobile big man or larger forward that can defend well and shoot some.
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
A slew of picks? I think you’ll be very disappointed then.

I’d be shocked if the Heat dont get at least a 1st or a player worth a 1st for Butler. Let alone just get neutral value back. Let alone have to attach assets/picks to Butler to move him (what you’re suggesting).
Well I also don't want to touch him with a 10 foot pole so the only disappointment I would have is if we actually traded for him.
 
. We need a proper big man to pair with Sabonis and slide Keegan into a more traditional forward position. We would instantly get bigger/longer and it would really bring some balance to the roster. You can run Fox and Monk together in the starting lineup if you have Keegan, X, and Sabonis out there. Ideally a mobile big man or larger forward that can defend well and shoot some.
I personally think we already have that forward in Keegan. He is essentially the same size as Aaron Gordon, about 9 pounds less in listed weight and same height. Keegan is already stronger than half the forwards in the league and imo he will only get bigger. I’ve said this before but I met his dad once and was shocked how big he was. Genetically he has a good chance of filling out a bit more and get even stronger. He’s also a great offensive rebounder and he blocks a shot nearly every game. We do need more size on the team in general so hopefully we can find that