NBA Draft: What Will The Kings Do?

Who Will The Kings End Up With From The Lottery?


  • Total voters
    85
  • Poll closed .
#91
He’s definitely a better fit than the general consensus seems to be. His best position right now is two guard. For him to become a superstar he will need to become an elite playmaker on top of being an elite scorer at point guard. The most likely outcome is he becomes an all star level shooting guard.

You can absolutely have two on ball scorers though. LeBron and Kyrie were obviously quite successful playing together pounding the air out of the rock.
How many score first, non defending backcourt duos have had success in the league?

I’ve said my piece on Ivey and will be thrilled if I am wrong and he becomes the next star in Sac, just seems like there are plenty of historical road blocks
 
#92
How many score first, non defending backcourt duos have had success in the league?

I’ve said my piece on Ivey and will be thrilled if I am wrong and he becomes the next star in Sac, just seems like there are plenty of historical road blocks
So, at 20 you're prepared to write off Ivey as an eternally bad defender? Lets see what it looks like with Fox/Ivey and a coach that actually doesn't rely on drop coverage. However most recently? Brunson/Luka. WCF.
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
#93
If we draft Ivey and keep him that means Brown thinks he can teach him to play D and work well with Fox (or that Monte has offers for Fox, but I think Fox and Sabonis may have already taken a shine to each other). There's pressure to make the playoffs which is my one reservation with Ivey, I think it will be a 2-3 year project to get everyone to fit vs. some type of move that produced 2 players that can contribute right away. I hope Brown's resume and recent success with the Warriors is enough to produce buy-in. That's really the key no matter what we do after three years of zero-responsibility between Luke and an interim coach.
 
#94
So, at 20 you're prepared to write off Ivey as an eternally bad defender? Lets see what it looks like with Fox/Ivey and a coach that actually doesn't rely on drop coverage. However most recently? Brunson/Luka. WCF.
I won’t write him off entirely but there just aren’t very many examples of bad college defenders becoming good at the pro level. The Brunson/ Luka example is solid but I’d put an asterisk next to it since Luka will probably be an all time great.

anyway, I’ve said alI I want to say on Ivey. If the kings draft him I’ll look forward to next season just as much as I always do.
 
#95
If we draft Ivey and keep him that means Brown thinks he can teach him to play D and work well with Fox (or that Monte has offers for Fox, but I think Fox and Sabonis may have already taken a shine to each other). There's pressure to make the playoffs which is my one reservation with Ivey, I think it will be a 2-3 year project to get everyone to fit vs. some type of move that produced 2 players that can contribute right away. I hope Brown's resume and recent success with the Warriors is enough to produce buy-in. That's really the key no matter what we do after three years of zero-responsibility between Luke and an interim coach.
This better be a 2-3 season project that isn't based on some hit the ground running from the top idea, and as I've said before, if Vivek is true to his word, he's literally talking play in next season. That's all. No huge deal. They've been just outside that window as is without Sabonis and a janky team of PG's and PF/C's instead, lol. Monte has set up the team for a perfect 2-3 season ascension to contender status if he plays it right. If they can pick off that potential 3rd star in the draft or even draft a potential star that can be a trade centerpiece that's MAJOR because if they work and end up staying that means you have a far more talented player on a steal of a rookie deal that allows you to go out and afford to spend next summer. On the flipside if you need an upgrade teams will listen. Draft a solid "fit", or a likely role guy then you just killed that probability from day 1. Unless this was all just throwing **** at the wall from Monte, which I doubt, he made more his own luck than anything I'd bet, but this is how you go about creating a serious window of about 3-4 seasons to make noise before you have to start trimming your cap back down or pay big sums to keep it together. And yeah, luck is a factor since moving up to 4 changed a ton, although even at 7-8 this would be a solid draft with his trades at the deadline, but now he's got serious value in his hand and GM's are already salivating. Pluck off your 3rd star, or get a godfather deal, then put the cherries on top next summer. Either way, they'll know where this team stands fairly early into next season.
 
#96
A big part of Bey for me is that it's a realistic deal, we have reason to believe Monte coveted him in past trade talks around Bagley, and it sticks to our timeline + cost containment & flexibility needs. Compared to the uncertainty of a future first, getting a 2 year player who seems to be of value to our GM and his build scenario, that would be great.

The fact that many Detroit people don't like it but many Kings people say its not enough also leads me to believe it isn't too far off being fair once you strip away biases and expectations. If Ivey becomes a bonafide superstar and we draft a really nice 3rd option and Bey a foundation of our rotation, and we become a regular playoff team most will say we blew it but they'll also be too busy enjoying the playoffs. Especially if in this scenario Fox is playing at a high level consistently.
Monte offered Bagley for Bey straight up. Did he really covet Bey that much?

The issue for Detroit is they don't have a lot of true talent and no replacement for Bey should he be traded. That is why there is so much pushback when he's discussed. Detroit does have a mix of big men that can fill in for Grant though. Bagley actually fits better with that group then Grant does.
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
#97
Monte offered Bagley for Bey straight up. Did he really covet Bey that much?

The issue for Detroit is they don't have a lot of true talent and no replacement for Bey should he be traded. That is why there is so much pushback when he's discussed. Detroit does have a mix of big men that can fill in for Grant though. Bagley actually fits better with that group then Grant does.
Yes but a) Detroit would still have their 2023 pick, b) still have Grant to trade c) this is all hinging on the truth to Detroit really wants to move up to 4 chatter. Do they or don't they? If they do, it is going to cost something.

Anyhow, I don't know how much Monte does or doesn't covet Bey, we just seem to know he is a player he has targeted. The only other players he has verifiably targeted are now Kings, save for the failed Lakers deal.
 
#98
How many score first, non defending backcourt duos have had success in the league?

I’ve said my piece on Ivey and will be thrilled if I am wrong and he becomes the next star in Sac, just seems like there are plenty of historical road blocks
The Cavs won a championship starting JR Smith next to Kyrie Irving.
 
Technically that is an example of two score first guards but smith averaged like 8 points a game that year.
The back court started an extremely weak defender in Kyrie and a net neutral defensive guard at best prone to many defensive lapses in jr smith. Their starting lineup featured two ball dominant players. Why does it matter if the other guard wasn’t also a big time scorer?
 
Technically that is an example of two score first guards but smith averaged like 8 points a game that year.
The obvious answer is always Dame/CJ in this argument and I think they are a good example of how much a defensive strategy matters. They won 50+ games both hovering around a pretty bad 112-113 DRTG and they also had years of being much higher, and lower depending on the team. I'm not a huge advanced stats person, I think people look at them as a cause rather than a result which is all they are but according to the ratings last year, Fox is a better defender than Davion according to DRTG. If Dame/CJ can get it together enough to get up in to that 105 range anyone can.
 
Why do people want Bey? his shooting percentages suck.
If they're trading Ivey I hope its for a superstar or something way more then Bey and Keegan Murray..
if they end up with a pick lower then 4 I hope they take Mathurin. Murrays soft. This team needs more thugs.
Exactly. Who the heck is Bey? It will be stupid of the Kings to trade #4 for someone that doesn't stand out. No Bey, no Kuz, no Randle, all these washed up slightly average players...c'mon man. No wonder the Kings suck from year to year because EVEN the fans don't know talents. They don't know what's good in front of them. Ivey is the real deal! Pick him and build him. Who's to say he can't play with FOX? You're going to regret not picking him down the road just like regretting picking Doncic (BECAUSE HE DOESN'T FIT WITH FOX). Give me a break!
 
Exactly. Who the heck is Bey? It will be stupid of the Kings to trade #4 for someone that doesn't stand out. No Bey, no Kuz, no Randle, all these washed up slightly average players...c'mon man. No wonder the Kings suck from year to year because EVEN the fans don't know talents. They don't know what's good in front of them. Ivey is the real deal! Pick him and build him. Who's to say he can't play with FOX? You're going to regret not picking him down the road just like regretting picking Doncic (BECAUSE HE DOESN'T FIT WITH FOX). Give me a break!
Pretty poor take.

You’re arguing against a point that wasn’t even made. Nobody suggested trading #4 for Bey. The proposed deal was #4 for Bey/#5.

If you’re going to trash on the fanbase, you better have your facts straight.
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
My biggest fear is a T-Rob situation happening where Ivey is off the board and we take the person that fell and he is a total washout.

I don't think that is 100% likely to happen, but at this stage I'm super cool with an Ivey experiment if that's what is decided, or we draft and trade him for a ridiculous package.

If we somehow do 5+Grant for 4, I hope we immediately repackage Grant for 7 or maybe some deal to Charlotte for their 2 picks. I'm not sure how I feel about maxing out Grant if it works. On one hand, you sort of have to. On the other you've completely locked in at that point so if you haven't guaranteed a first round HCA I don't think you ever will.
 
Why does it matter if the other guard wasn’t also a big time scorer?
we aren’t building around prime Lebron like the Cavs were.

a backcourt duo that features the two best players on the team, are both score first and questionable at best on the defensive end does not have a long track record of success. That’s really all I’m saying.
 

Spike

Subsidiary Intermediary
Staff member
Pretty poor take.

You’re arguing against a point that wasn’t even made. Nobody suggested trading #4 for Bey. The proposed deal was #4 for Bey/#5.

If you’re going to trash on the fanbase, you better have your facts straight.
Furthermore, passing on Ivey is NOWHERE near passing on Doncic. Ivey isn't the talent Doncic is - he's not even the talent Fox is. He's just a kid with potential, and this time of year, people go crazy for potential, because that's the nature of the draft.

I like Ivey, and I like his mom even more, but he's the best guard in a draft dominated by bigs, so he's standing out even more. I get it, but he's not the be-all end-all. He's a good talent, but not a game-changer right now. He could be 3 years from now. But so could Murray, Mathurin, Holmgren, Smith, Banchero, etc.
 
we aren’t building around prime Lebron like the Cavs were.

a backcourt duo that features the two best players on the team, are both score first and questionable at best on the defensive end does not have a long track record of success. That’s really all I’m saying.
You just aren’t going to get elite defensive production out of your back court typically. You’re hoping for net neutral and then lean on bigs and big wings. The one good point you made here is having two score first guards.

One of them is going to have to become a high end playmaker to take this team far and if fox isn’t that guy you should still keep rolling the dice.
 
The ball goes thru Sabonis in the half-court while Fox and Ivey are cutting.
The full court is all Fox and Ivey running it down teams throats.
We will be exciting. Fast and furious. Do it.
But where’s the shooting? And the defense?

You really think Sabonis Fox and Ivey can all get theirs in the paint when we have nothing close to an elite shooter spacing the offense? In an era where the 3 ball is more important than ever, that team would be comprised of exactly 0 great shooters.

I just don’t think that would work at all, unless the kings can somehow snag the elusive 3 and D wing that they’ve been missing for years, and a stretch 5 who can also defend. Those are pretty big “if’s”

If Ivey is the pick, Fox or Ivey would eventually have to be traded, in my opinion. I just don’t see any way that you can have two non-shooting, non-defending players in your backcourt and expect to win. Not unless Mike Brown is some sort of coaching genius…
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
Just perused a bit. One thing I learned today: I want to slap the S*#% out of about 95% of Detroit Pistons fans. Who knew! I get that we are in the NBA basement but these dudes are rockin with a fresh arrogance like it’s 2005. The delusion is almost admirable.
It's pretty crazy because the reports are "Detroit wants to move up" not "Sacramento is desperate to sell". There's other buyers. Nobody knows who we are locked in on if it isn't Ivey, so if it's Daniels he could go anywhere in the top 7-10. Also if they gave up an unrestricted 2023 FRP instead it could work out a million times worse for them. I'm not convinced Detroit is ready to contend next year but they also aren't squarely in the "tanking for sure" category that Houston and OKC are in. But they haven't hired a new coach either, which leads me to believe there is no urgency in Detroit next year.
 

Tetsujin

The Game Thread Dude
Just perused a bit. One thing I learned today: I want to slap the S*#% out of about 95% of Detroit Pistons fans. Who knew! I get that we are in the NBA basement but these dudes are rockin with a fresh arrogance like it’s 2005. The delusion is almost admirable.
It's absolutely wild. You'd think they were coming off a Finals appearance like the Celtics (except I'm pretty sure there are more Celtics fan who'd totally be willing to move Jayson Tatum for the 4th pick right now than there are Piston fans willing to move Bey for the 4).
 
It's pretty crazy because the reports are "Detroit wants to move up" not "Sacramento is desperate to sell".
This point cannot be emphasized enough. The Kings are driving a seller’s market here, not trying to unload a toxic asset.

Yet despite it being well documented that several teams are vying to move up for Ivey, and the 4th pick has real value, every fanbase is convinced the Kings are desperate to give it up because of Givony’s stupid, unsourced “not preferred destination” trite.

Honestly, there are very few ways the Kings can screw this up.

One of the top 3 big men could fall in their lap. They could choose Ivey straight up and either try to run with it or put together a trade later. Or they could trade down for a better fitting player and some extra assets.

Now let’s all watch in shock and awe as they somehow manage to screw this up.
 

SLAB

Hall of Famer
This point cannot be emphasized enough. The Kings are driving a seller’s market here, not trying to unload a toxic asset.

Yet despite it being well documented that several teams are vying to move up for Ivey, and the 4th pick has real value, every fanbase is convinced the Kings are desperate to give it up because of Givony’s stupid, unsourced “not preferred destination” trite.

Honestly, there are very few ways the Kings can screw this up.

One of the top 3 big men could fall in their lap. They could choose Ivey straight up and either try to run with it or put together a trade later. Or they could trade down for a better fitting player and some extra assets.

Now let’s all watch in shock and awe as they somehow manage to screw this up.
Take and wait. Take and wait. We turned Hali into an all-star. We have to see what this prized asset that everyone else wants is before doing anything. This prized asset that’s just falling into our lap by the lottery gods,

Don’t big brain this again.

Don’t,
 

gunks

Hall of Famer
I feel like the only way we completely screw the pooch is if Vlade or BW shows up with some weird contract provision that entitles them to make the pick this year.
Yeah, lots of options and we have a GM that's shown both an ability to gauge talent in the draft, and the patience to wait out a good deal.

I don't know what the heck is gonna happen weds, but I'm not really worried about it.